Text 1494, 66 rader
Skriven 2012-07-29 14:11:00 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
   Kommentar till text 1469 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Ward's Z1 node number
=============================
 JK> Give me a break.  If Ward _moves_ to the US, no problem and you know
 JK> it.

 MvdV> No, I do not know it. Ward HAS moved to the US. He walks there,
 MvdV> he eats there, he sleeps there, he shits there. More to the
 MvdV> point, he is the sysop of a system that is  physically located in
 MvdV> the US and that system can send and receive netmail.

1. does he have a work visa in the US?
2. does he pay income taxes in the US?
3. does he pay rent or land taxes in the US?
4. does he get paid to work in the US?

[trim]

 MvdV> Secondly, there is nothing that says one can only have a node
 MvdV> number in one zone at any time. There is plenty of precedence to
 MvdV> the contrary. Pablo Kleinman had a node in Spain and one in the
 MvdV> US. Sometimes he was in Spain, sometimes he was in the US, but he
 MvdV> kept both systems running all the time. Nobody complained. 

good example... except that pablo left the network years and years ago... there
are others, though, and there have been complaints about them...

[trim]

 JK> because Bob Seaborn told me to tell you:

 JK> "mikey- Ward has NOT applied for a z1 aka,

 MvdV> Ward did indeed not apply for a Z1 _AKA_. An AKA is a additional
 MvdV> number for an already listed system. Ward applied for a _new_
 MvdV> number for a _new_ system. A system located in the US.

this argument is total political crap... AKA == address, period...

 JK> he simply inquired on how to go about it.  He was told how, and as of
 JK> right now, no application has been received."

 MvdV> Ah, it got lost in the mail.... yet another excuse...

no one has said that it got lost... are you putting words in wards mouth?

[trim]

 MvdV> We all know that the so called "case histories" are fiction. They
 MvdV> are made up, they are not cases that actually occured. They set
 MvdV> no precedent. 

you have proof of this?

Policy1, section 6.6...
[QUOTE]
6.6     Case Histories

A  few  actual  case  histories of past disputes may be instructive to
show general procedures and methods.  Names  have  been  left  out  to
protect the guilty.
[/QUOTE]

note the exact phrase "actual case histories of past disputes" in the first
sentence...

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)