Text 925, 68 rader
Skriven 2012-07-19 20:36:42 av Torbjorn Mohn (2:211/37)
    Kommentar till text 920 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: .fidonet
================
>> This report covers 147 unique pathlines recovered from 14470 messages
>> posted in area FIDONEWS as seen from 1:3634/12.
>> Your pathlines does not show any links to 2:222/22 (BCG-Box, Kim
>> Heino).
> right... if there are no message arriving here with that 2d address in the
> path, i cannot map them...
> i note that kim has 5 addresses listed in nodelist.195...
> 2:22/222  BBBS Help - regional independent

That was the one i meant. MY TYPO.. sorry.... 2:22/222 is the one I use from
here, and the one where i collect the BBBS support echoes. Still it's not
there....


> 2:222/0   Southwest Finland Net - net222 host/coordinator
> 2:222/2   BCG-Box - hub (aka?)
> 2:222/222 BCG-Box - public system
> 2:222/42  bbbs.net - private system

> i don't see 2:222/22 :?

Sorry... my fault. Se above...

>> Messages I write here, messages Bjòrn writes from 2:203/2
>> does not appear in the Fidonews echo there.
> on kim's system? which one? there could easily be a typo with all those 2's
> involved...

It's ONE system, with a number og AKA's... 2:22/222 and 2:222/2 and 2:222/222
and 2:222/42 are all the same system. I dunno why he uses different Node
numbers.... When I telnet there and write a message, i telnet bbbs.net which is
2:222/42.

>> Lots of other messages do, but I suspect that somwhere messages
>> passing through 2:203/2 outbound are filtered away?
>that is possible but i don't think that björn would be that stupid... it would
>get found out and pretty quickly, i'd guess... i remember back in the day when
>someone was stuffing the seenbys and how quickly that it was found out who was
> doing it...

No, I did NOT mean that Björn is doing it, what I suspect is that someone else
is sensoring messages that has passed through 2:203/0 on their way?

>> If I write a message in the Fidonews echo at 2:222/22 it does NOT
>> show up here at 2:211/37.
> this could be if there is a typo... if the only system between you and kim is
> 2:203/0, then i would be looking there and especially for a typo in all those
> 2's...

Se above...

>> I don't know what to conclude out of this, but somewhere out there
>> somthing rotten is still going on.
>it could be simple human error and it is taking other eyes to see it... i'd be
> checking that address you are writing for kim's system... it isn't listed in
> the nodelist but it may have been typoed in this message or possibly in the
> nodelist... some systems won't process mail for nodes not in the nodelist...
> and then there's the whole secure/insecure connection thing... a typo could
> easily result in the mail being dumped into the insecure directory and then
> being sent to /dev/nul...

I don't think this is the case here. Messages written in other echoes at
BCG-Box (bbbs.net) is flowing fine....

Torbjørn

--- BBBS/NT v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Circle Of Protection (2:211/37)