Text 9833, 96 rader
Skriven 2009-03-02 19:48:42 av JOHN FITZGERALD (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av DAVE DRUM
Ärende: OBAMA ANOTHER OIL MAN?
==============================
-


JF>  Again, Democrats parroted the mantra 'No War for Oil' claiming 
JF>  this is the only reason for invading Iraq.  By not pulling out 
JF>  immediately,  is Obama also in it for the oil?  After all, 
JF>  he plans on keeping 50,000 troops in that country for at 
JF>  least another year and a half.

JF>  So which was/is it?   'War for oil', or securing that country 
JF>  so as not to let Saddam rebuild and regroup?  What would things 
JF>  be like in that area of the Middle East today, 2009, if Saddam 
JF>  was left to himself these past six years?

DD>   So, tell us Fitzgerald, how would you manage getting us out of
DD>   garrisoning Iraq after the Bushies have screwed the pooch there 
DD>   so thoroughly? 

  You haven't been paying attention.  Obama has just thanked our troops
for a job well done.   The new Iraqi gov is dug in good, and are almost
ready to go it alone.  They just completed an election where all 
factions turned out to vote.  They have freedom now and aren't about 
to just let go of it. Any resistance left in the country are hiding 
under a rock with only an occasional car-bomb to show for. Still in all,
if Iraq was and is not a threat, and there are no remaining/unresolved 
issues, like missing WMD, and if it was just a war for oil, then Obama 
is just another puppet for the oil companies.  Right?

  And I notice you haven't got it yet.  I don't think Obama is an oil
man, but if you're gonna run the 'war for oil' sing-along, then you 
have to include Obama who plans on staying there for another year 
and a half.  Was it 'war for oil', and Saddam was just some harmless 
stooge?  Apparently you favor the two dimensional view, the one they 
could more easily sell to all the naive grass-roots loud mouths.



DD>   Yeah, we knew he had WMDs ... Donny Rumpot sold them 
DD>   to him. And he used 'em up against the Kurd and Iranians.
DD>   Pictures and article here - 
DD>   http://tinyurl.com/donny-sadam

  This is old news, and doesn't explain what Clinton's people were 
reporting on for eight+ years, including WMD programs to produce their 
own WMD.  Since we waited a year and a half after 9/11 before going 
into Iraq, Saddam had plenty of time and was given plenty of warnings
to clean up his act.  No WMD?  What else would you expect at that point?
Easy math.


JF>   Don't forget Diane Feinstein's husband Richard Blum who held major
JF> shares in two big defense contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
JF> Perini Corp and URS Corp. She sat on the board (MILCON) that awarded
JF> them big contracts in those countries. And don't forget George Soros
JF> who bought up major shares of Haliburton in 2006.  Soros as I suspect
JF> you know is a big supporter of the DNC, a major contributor to Obama
JF> and is suspected of indirectly funneling money to Obama through many 
JF> of his shadow companies so as to skirt the laws on limits to 
JF> contributions to politicians.  That would well explain the record 
JF> amounts of campaign  contributions Obama received during 
JF> his campaign.

DD>  So, Soros is not and was not annointed President of the 
DD>  United States. Nor hashe been accused by any more credible 
DD>  that the usual conspiracy theorists and sore losers of 
DD>  making illegal campaign contribution to President 
DD>  Obama's campaign. 

    He's been suspected and/or accused by everyone but the Democrats, 
who he helped by spending many many millions trying to defeat Bush. 
And though Obama received contributions from many grass roots orgs, 
they are not known to contribute large amounts, and certainly doesn't 
account for the many many millions of record contributions Obama 
received from still undisclosed sources.

  And I notice you have no words for Feinstein here.  What excuses do
you have for her?   She and her husband Richard Blum profited greatly 
from contracts in both Iraq and Afghanistan.


JF>   Democrats have abandoned their platform to complain about 
JF>   Haliburton a long time ago, because they are no different.

DD>   And, just possibly because HalLiburton 
DD>   has been reined in, maybe.

  Hmmm..  Is that your 'conspiracy theory'?  Soros is a manipulating 
profiteer of the lowest order, and would reek havoc on a country's 
economy if he could profit from it, just as he almost did with Great 
Britain and the Bank of England with his currency exchange scam.



---
 *   *
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)