Text 10425, 88 rader
Skriven 2005-03-17 14:19:24 av Janis Kracht (1:261/38)
   Kommentar till text 7284 av Björn Felten (2:203/2)
Ärende: Shannon Talley's copyright violations
=============================================
Hello Bjorn,

>>> It's really amazing how you now try to put the only ZC, that has
>>> seriously questioned your motives, into your backstabbing of Ward.
>> Get over it Bjorn, it's a done deal.
> You wish, don't you?

Heh.. I'll repeat it one more time:

It's a done deal.  It's BEEN a done deal :)  At this time all you can do is
bitch and moan about the results, see what I mean?  Your messages are full of
just that, over and over and over and over :)  Feel free to continue though,
doesn't make a bit of difference.

>> It isn't the only time that one of
>> Ward's proposals was discarded by a member of the ZCC (and this one by
>> Renato).
> So now you're trying to tell us that Renato discarded Ward's ruling? Keep

Are you that impaired that you cannot read my message? Slow down boy, you're
letting things get to you :)

> digging, it's still all in the open for anyone interested to see...

I don't think so :)

>> What a waste of time you and your antics are :)  It's a good thing I've
>> got some time today to reply to your nonsense - And that's just what it
>> is, NONSENSE :)

> If it's nonsense, how come you even bother to comment on it? I bet you still
> have quite some skeletons in your closet that you feel the urge to explain.

Don't try to project your own shortcomings on me :)  They don't stick :)

>> He accepted the nomination and I _knew_ he'd be a GOOD IC. Pretty simple
>> to me :)

> So the question asked in the election wasn't really who was the *best* IC,
> but who would be a *good* IC? Thanks for clearing that out.

Now it is REALLY obvious you are getting more desperate :)

> All of us old fidonet farts, that's been in this hobby for many more years
>than you, obviously have seen how Ward, for the entire period of your Z1C time
> has over and over again tried to cover your sorry ass, whenever you, over and
> over again, have failed to produce a proper zone 1 nodelist segment.

Yep, shit happens... and guess what, sometimes it's the RC's segment.  But I'm
not going to name names and such.  That would just feed your bad habits :)
Funny you should say this as well.. Ward says that he's never had a problem
with my Zone 1 segments <smile> Ask him :)

> Not only during the first three or four weeks it took you to initially
> produce a proper Z1 segment, but also after all the times when the crappy

Oh no!  You knew about that??? too much the foolish things you take high ground
on :)


> software, that you've insisted on using, failed. We know that Ward over and
> over again had to call you personally (POTS) to prevent the entire zone 1, or
> major parts of it, from being removed from fidonet.

Now I think you'd better check with him again bud. Btw, the calls were free for
him -  Mine to him cost me $50.00 - big deal all in all.. :)

> And now you claim that Malcolm is a better IC than Ward? How many phone
>calls do you expect to get from him the next time you fail to produce a proper
> Z1 segment?

I _KNOW_ he's a better IC that Ward :)

>>> You really would love that, wouldn't you? I can assure you, fidonet
>>> history is not as easily rewritten as you'd like it to be.
>> Sour Grapes  -  also pretty simple to see :)
> Sour grapes? How do you manage to find any such in what I wrote above?
> Methinks you've never even read any of the writings of Aesopus...

I guess I need to repeat this one as well - eventually you'll figure it out:

Sour Grapes :)

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)