Text 1150, 91 rader
Skriven 2004-10-23 12:17:00 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
     Kommentar till en text av Roy Witt (1:10/22)
Ärende: FidoNews 21:38 [09/09]: Fidonews Information
====================================================
 >  MvdV> How many times does it have to be explained to you
 >  MvdV> that rules that go against the law of another country
 >  MvdV> are null and void in that country.

 > It is against USA law for you to participate in the HAM
 > echo without my permission.

I am not in th USA. Its laws do not apply to me.

 > I give that permission in the rules of the echo. My
 > requirement for participation is for the user to read and
 > agree to abide by those rules, or don't participate in my echo.

Since I never agreed to that, I am not bound to honour your wishes.

 > You have violated American law

Of no consequance as I am not under American jurisdiction. (In any definition
of "Amercia")

 > and you've violated my rules.

As your wish is not my command, that is of no consequence either.

 > How many times does that have to be bounced off your thick
 > skull before it finally gets through?

It will never get though, your phantasies never will.

 >  >> But I can cut your feed and that will be binding on you.

 >  MvdV> You already cut my feed two years ago.

 > No I didn't. I merely told you to stay out of the HAM echo.

No, you tried to get my feed cut. Here is part of a copy of the message:

(22)    Wed 9 Oct 02  8:14      Rcvd: Fri 11 Oct  5:56
By: Roy Witt
To: Michiel van der Vlist
Re: Rules
St: Pvt  Rcvd
-----------------------------------------------------------------
@INTL 2:280/5555 1:10/22
@MSGID: 1:10/22 3da3e99f
@REPLY: 2:280/5555 da321050
@PID: GEDW32 3.0.1
@CHRS: IBMPC 2
 --==>O/T-RSN: BOUNCE (boring)

*** Answering a msg posted in area HAM (HAM).


CC: Michiel van der Vlist  2:280/5555.0
CC: Kees van.Eeten  2:280/5003.0
CC: Dale Ross  1:379/1.0

Please cut the feed to the HAM echo for Michiel van der Vlist.

== cut ===

Need any more to refresh your memory?

 > Your presence was not then, nor is it now, welcome. You and your NC
 > refused to reply to or acknowledge my netmail.

Of course he refused. Echomail is not the NC's bailifwick. I suggest you
consult EP1 to find out who's turf it is.

 >  >>  MvdV> Show me the message where I say "I agree".

 >  >> Show me the message (echomail or netmail) where you asked
 >  >> for a copy of the rules.

 >  MvdV> Why should I aks for a copy of the rules? It is *you*
 >  MvdV> that seems to want my agreement.

 > Actually, I don't want you to come anywhere near the HAM
 > echo. I don't need you there, nor does anyone else who uses
 > the echo.

Your wish is noted. As however your wish is not my command, I shall ignore it.

 > You offer nothing to anyone else of value.

That is not for you to judge.

Cheers, Michiel

--- InterMail 229kx
 * Origin: PA0MMV, Driebergen, NL (2:280/5555)