Text 21515, 73 rader
Skriven 2006-01-08 03:19:53 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 21190 av Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1)
Ärende: Editor's censorship
===========================

 Mv>> I think it is wrong and so I will speak against it as long as I can.

 FV> Ok. I'll continue to insert my POV and other things as well.

You are more then welcome to do so as long as I can do the same
without being called anti-American.

 FV> Sorry. If one hits you, you hit back. If the terrorists hit you, hit back.
 FV> A good way to escalate a difference into a war, but it seems to be the way
 FV> things happen.... and the only thing the terrorists understand.

Then attack the terrorists that are responsible and don't attack an entire
country that didn't have anything to do with it.
Why is ObL still free and alive while 30,000 Iraquis are dead? It's no sense
in it.
Perhaps you haven't heard me saying this before so I say it again, Bush
invaded Iraq for the wrong reason and that's what make the rest of the world
so frustrated.

 >> but I still would not wish to take a knife to a gun fight. ;)
 Mv>> You got it backwards: it is the terrorists that have the knife.

 Mv>> By fighting the knife with a gun you are only giving the opponent a
 Mv>> reason to want a gun too.

 FV> Yes, and if you turn the other cheek and you get hit again and again, what
 FV> then? The meek may inherit the earth, but I wonder if they would want it?
 FV> After the rest of the people get through terrorizing and raping the earth,
 FV> there might not be much left of interest to anyone that is still here.

The U.S. isn't totlly innocent either so I wonder who really did the first
slapping
and then I don't mean with weapons.

 FV> I really don't have an answer. I just know that this radical group of
 FV> terrorists can't be allowed to win. I have no desire to change languages
 FV> and/or religions... or other such things. By constantly backing up from
 FV> and "understanding" that these poor people were mistreated in the past and
 FV> should be given anything they want in an effort to soothe their shattered
 FV> and violated souls and such, the world encourages their behaviour and will
 FV> eventually lead to a global dominance by them. That is their stated goal
 FV> in their interpretation of their holy book.

No, it isn't.
Like with the Bible it *can* be interpreted in so many ways but for a *true*
muslim it's the religion of peace.
How many Christians live up to the 10 commandments for example? How
many follows the Bible? Does Bush?

 FV> I'll live and let live, but
 FV> when someone slaps me, I tend to get a bit pissed. I may have to take it
 FV> because I'm smaller, but if I'm not smaller, I will demand the ceasing of
 FV> the treatment.

See my answer to what Frank Schiedt wrote. That's what pisses *us* up.
Is he to be called a true Christian?

 FV> NOTE: I'm not talking about all of the people of that religious faith.
 FV> Most are good people and I have no problems with those.

Like I have no problem with you but I do have with the other Frank.
Listening to him is like seeing/listen to a n old bl/w film from Germany from
1935 when the brown-boots started to march here in Europe and we all know
where that took us. Shouldn't we learn something from the history?
Get rid of the fanatics (on both sides) and there will be peace on earth.

 FV> At any rate, you have your stand and beliefs and I have mine. Go in peace.

The same to you.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)