Text 26855, 86 rader
Skriven 2006-04-11 10:35:00 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av STEWART ARNETT
Ärende: Canadian "Skills"
=========================
-=> Quoting Stewart Arnett to Frank Scheidt <=-

 SA>> that claim yet you did when you said "I was there," as a direct
 SA>> reference to the discussion of the war in Europe, just after you
 SA>> accused all Europeans of being cowards.
 
 FS> We were discussing WWII.  And I *was* there ... then some of you
 FS> tried to twist it into my saying I was in the European Theater
 FS> instead of the American Theater.

 SA> No, you are the one trying to twist what you first stated, can you not
 SA> read what all the others are saying (writing) in regards to your
 SA> statement. 
 FS>>  I've asked that question many times but no
 FS>> one has ever given me an answer.  I don't expect one from you
 FS>> either as you aren't exactly honest.
 
 SA>> Seems silly to ask that question, you were the one making the
 SA>> claim, no one else claimed it for you.
 
 FS> I see you *still* will not answer my very pertinent question:
 FS> *Why* would I claim being in the European Theater rather than in
 FS> the American Theater?  WHY???  Of course the European Theater
 FS> *paid* more but that was no valid reason.  So I ask again, why??!

 SA> Of course I am not goin to answer that question ... in this discussion
 SA> it is a moot point, 

Here's a fundamental fact -- and you might want to have someone 
write this down for you:  When one does or says something, 
there's always a *reason*.  Got that?  Let's assume you have.  In 
that event there's *always* an explanation for saying something.  
Say, for example, someone claimed to have been in Paris when the 
Germans occupied it in 1940.  There would have to be a *reason* 
why someone said that.  Think about it and stop being so 
stubborn.

 SA> you were caught out lying and hoped to sqwiggle out
 SA> of it. 

Since I didn't lie there's no need for me to "sqwiggle".  OTOH 
people who misinterpreted what I *did* say have painted 
themselves into a corner and don't know how to get out.  You, for 
example, keep evading the issue.

 SA> Our question is simply why would you claim to have fought in
 SA> Europe, when infact you never even left the USA?  

Have you stopped beating your wife?  *That* question would make 
as much sense.  I have *never* claimed to have been a combat 
soldier -- never.  Yet you keep dragging this red herring around.  
Doesn't it tire you?

 SA> Of course you had no
 SA> valid reason to make such a claim, yet you made it all the same. 

Ah!  *Now* we're getting somewhere.  You *admit* there was no 
reason for me to make such a claim.  Good.  Next you'll admit it 
was a misinterpretation of what I actually said which caused you 
to make the mistake.

 SA> Would
 SA> you in this case then tell us what front line actions you were involved
 SA> in, or would you like someone else to make it public? 

Keep beating that dead horse, Stewart, you might win the race 
*yet* ... heh heh heh ...

 SA> after all you
 SA> regard those in Europe who were on the front line as being cowards. 

Oh, so *now* you're coming up with something *else* I didn't 
claim.  Is there no limit to your perfidy, Stewart?

 SA> Why
 SA> not tell us your experience and prove that you were at least somewhere,
 SA> not wearing out leather and a playground in a cadet camp in the USA. 

I hate to ask this, knowing you'll not give an honest answer, but 
what *is* a "playground in a cadet camp"??????

... Do not have less ruth ...

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)