Text 36903, 89 rader
Skriven 2006-08-18 08:58:03 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 36884 av BOB KLAHN (1:123/140)
Ärende: Lieberman and OBL            -      was: Lieberman
==========================================================
17 Aug 06 18:20, BOB KLAHN wrote to ROY WITT:


 RW>> 11 Aug 06 15:53, BOB KLAHN wrote to ROY WITT:

 BK>>>  ...

 RW>>>> This reminds me. It seems that the liberals in CT and the
 RW>>>> liberal party have rejected a very good Senator because he
 RW>>>> dared to agree that we needed to be in Iraq and that he's

 BK>>>  Well, that was dumb. Lieberman was rejected for kissing up to
 BK>>>  Bush.

 RW>> Not really. The jerk who won will have to face him in the
 RW>> fall anyway, as an independent. When the Senate comes back
 RW>> from it's holiday recess, there will be one less Democrat
 RW>> and two independent Senators.

 BK>  Of course, Lieberman is the republican candidate.

LOL! And he's more popular with the voters now than when he was a liberal.
You never know, maybe he'll be the 3rd party candidate that kills the
Democrat party's bid for Prez in 08...that would be funnier than hell.

 BK>>>  Whatever else Leiberman did, he helped inflict 4 more years of
 BK>>>  Bush on this country.
 RW>> Which is a good thing, else we'd have the Liberal idiots
 RW>> leading this country into oblivion.
 BK>  Instead of corrupt republicans leading this country into
 BK>  oblivion.

That'd be the day...corruption is the Democrat party's way with higher
taxes and more welfare.

 BK>>> He now claims he opposes Bush down the line, but only agrees with
 BK>>> him on Iraq. On that basis he backed Bush against his own party.
 RW>> And this also flys in the face of the Democrats, as their
 RW>> Presidential hopeful, Billeray Clinton also backed Bush on
 BK>  See... unless you are a democrat, you get no say in who is the
 BK>  democratic candidate.

Frankly, if you're a democrat with a say, no one else cares.

 RW>> the Iraq war. Although she's trying to get as far away as
 RW>> she can from that these days.
 BK>  BTW, when did the Iraq war ever come up for a vote?

Ask John Kerry and Billery. They both voted to support the war, unless you
ask them when they're in denial. That's a completely 'nother story as they
try to evade the question.

 BK>>>  For that alone he deserves to be rejected.
 RW>> But instead, he'll be elected with a lot of Republican
 RW>> votes, because of the idiot who will be representing the
 RW>> liberals.
 BK>  He is the republican candidate.

No, he's an Independant candidate, thanks to the backstabbing Democrats.

 BK>>> The damage Bush has done to this country will last a long time
 BK>>> beyond his term in office.
 RW>> Fortunately, he hasn't allowed the Dems to get to the point
 RW>> where the country would be kissing the ass of Osama Bin
 RW>> Laden, again.
 BK>  You mean like Clinton trying to kill OBL?

No, I mean when he kissed his ass and let him go when he had him in
custody...

 BK> Instead we have Bush letting OBL escape, letting his family assemble
 BK> to leave the country without being questioned, and saying he didn't
 BK> care about OBL?

I see you've never been rabbit hunting or you would know that they run in
circles and will be coming around if you just sit and wait. You can save a
lot of energy that way. Newbie hunters waste all of their energy chasing
the rabbit.

OBL is roaming around 'no where' with nothing to do but look at the camel
balls swinging back and forth as it leads OBL back to his cave. When he
decides to come out of his hole, then he'll come around again. No need to
chase him.

               R\%/itt


--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)