Text 38456, 85 rader
Skriven 2006-09-06 09:59:20 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 38451 av Jeff Smith (1:14/0)
Ärende: Lieberman and OBL
=========================
 BF>> He posted his msg. at least 12 hours before me and in my post with the
 BF>> question you must have read his statement and STILL you respond to ME and
 BF>> not him.
 BF>> Somehow I find that a bit strange.

 JS>      Frankly I am not suprized that you find it strange. Regardless, that
 JS> be the reality of the situation. Björn, we have been through this before
 JS> and I have explained things to you before.

So why didn't you learn then to read it all before making judgements? You
overlooked the original post than as you did now. Usually I read every post
in a thread before responding and since I don't see you participate in anything
else except from when America is being "attacked" (hope you remember how
"  " is used) I quite don't understand your agenda.

 JS> Either you weren't listening or
 JS> you just want to rehash the same argument over and over. Course you could
 JS> be joining me in the throws of senility. <g>

In that case this echo is full of senility. Who is the best in here to use the
same
arguments over and over and over..... A hint, the one that doesn't like me to
write 4 dots....

 BF>> You even seems to be more selective in your reading.

 JS>      Considering the BS level around here it would only seem like a
 JS> reasonable course of action. I have neither the time or the interest to
 JS> read all the messages that come in here. And no, I don't read all of
 JS> either you or Roy's messages.

But somehow you managed to read my question to Roy....

 JS>>>      My guess is that he makes those types of statements because
 JS>>> he knows what he needs to say to get you to respond. Guess he is
 JS>>> starting to know you better huh?

 BF>> And you don't think I'm starting to know him too?

 JS>      I would hope so. If so then only play his game if you choose to.

As I've said before, if I should play his game and respond to everything he
says, this echo would would contain over 50 msg./day from me but I let him
do that.

 BF>>  since he know he will get
 BF>> away with everything regarless if he starts a "war" or not, he knows that
 BF>> none of you will ever go against him, not even when he says that dropping
 BF>> bombs on us and shoot us would be fun but if *I* would have said that
 BF>> about Americans all hell would have broken loose from everyone in Z1.
 BF>> Correct me if I'm wrong.

 JS>      Actually I think you have a point there Björn. I think part of the
 JS> reason is because many in Z1 know Roy better and better know when he is
 JS> serious and when he is simply button pushing.

But you haven't learned when I or for example Ward, are serious or pushing
buttons. That is to be a bit of a selective reader.

 JS> I tend to overlook the BS
 JS> and focus on the more serious stuff. What little there still is. You
 JS> probably see that as selective reading on my part. It actually may be but
 JS> not for the reasons that you suggest.

Yes, I do since, see above, you don't partitipate in anything else than when
America is being "attacked".

 JS>      Maybe when I grow old and feeble minded I can read and post more.
 JS> Adding
 JS> more giberish to the existing giberish. Gosh.... We there already? Wow,
 JS> short trip.

What's considered BS or not is up to the reader and if you consider it's BS
to understand for example how it is to ride a bike through Australia like David
has done is up to you. For the rest (some anyway) of us it is to getting to
know
how life can be traveling that way and to see the pics from that trip was very
interesting.
But if you don't have that interest it's just to use the "next" key but don't
call
it BS. Some of us do have an interset of understanding how others have it,
how they live and what they do.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)