Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33805
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   23541
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12847
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4193
FN_SYSOP   41525
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13585
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16053
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22012
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   900
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4785
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1117
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   2794
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13064
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2055
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4277
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   28499
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2016
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6000
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
Möte FIDONEWS_OLD1, 49742 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 42527, 177 rader
Skriven 2006-11-12 07:39:00 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av TORBJORN MOHN
Ärende: [1/2] Insults
=====================
 >>> Part 1 of 2...

-=> Quoting Torbjorn Mohn to Ross Cassell <=-

I have quoted almost the entire message for one reason and for 
one reason only:  Where are the indicators of the *authors* of 
the posters involved?  That is which ones are by Mr. Mohn and 
which ones are by Mr. Cassell????

##########################
 
 >>> Reagan and slick willy got by with Congress in the hands of the
 >>> opposition party, do you really see what happened as a magic light
 >>> switch?
 
 >> Many things will be changed in this country, and I expect to see many
 >> investigations of this administration as well.  It's too bad that Bush
 >> fired Rumsfeld.. I would have rather Rumsfeld was investigated for his
 >> actions as well... I wouldn't doubt that is why Rumsfeld was removed.
 
 > List the things that will be changed?
 
 > Do remember that when the Repubs took Congress in a far more dramatic and
 >convincing fashion in 1994, not too many of the changes they promised became
a
 > reality. Kicker is, they had a plan and a message, the democrats of 2006 do
 > not.
 
 >>> The bright spot here is Bush is gonna learn how to veto things..
 
 >> Sure, he has that option... but if the Republican party wants to
 >> survive this Bush won't be so quick to veto every measure.  Then
 >> again, don't forget, supenas like those that crushed the end of
 >> Clinton's term could well be applied to Bush.  Remember that period in
 >> US History, when the Republicans did indeed state that "no one was
 >> above the law".
 
 > As I explained to someone else in another forum...
 
 >A Bush VETO wont be damaging to the GOP under circumstances I predict would
be
 > the case.
 
 > It takes a 2/3's majority vote in both chambers to override a presidential
 > veto. The Democrats possess no such majority in either chamber.
 
 > Lets look at the house, if a bill initially was passed on the strength of
the
 > dem majority, with a spattering of repub votes, lets say 175 repubs voted
 > against it. We can assume similiarly narrow initial passage in the Senate.
 
 > It will take 292 Votes in the House to override a Veto, Dems dont hold that
 > many seats. 435 X .67
 
 >It will take 67 votes in the Senate, DEMS dont hold that many seats. 100 X
.67
 
 >A bill passed on the virtue of the DEM majority with a small splattering of
GO
 > votes, that gets vetoed and sent back to the originating chamber, well to
 > override would mean that those who initially voted against the bill the
first
 >time, would have to change their vote, so if 175 repubs initially rejected
the
 > bill the first time, do you thing 32 or more of them would change their vote
 > contrary to their first vote to sustain a override?
 
 > Not likely..
 
 > This is the gridlock we will see, its more evident when there is a weak
 > majority in the legislative body.
 
 > Your assertion can only hold true if the legislation passes Congress on veto
 >proof grounds, meaning it passed the house by 292 or more and the Senate by
67
 > or more. In this case if a bill lands on Bushes desk that he objects to, but
 >see's its literally bound to be passed anyway be a congressional veto
override
 > because of the initial votes the bill passed on, he would likely not sign
it,
 > and let the bill pass by default by not acting on it for 10 days. Of course
 > there is the pocket veto, if such a bill gets to him, like at the end of a
 >congressional session, he can not act on the bill and it would die naturally
i
 > there is no congress in session to act on the bill. (10 day rule applies)
 
 >>> If legislation passed congress down party lines, the existing
 >>> majority wont be able to override any such veto..
 
 >> Possible.
 
 > Not possible, very likely.
 
 >>> Assuming the VA Senate seat goes left, do you think the Repubs wont
 >>> pull the same obstructionist BS the Dems did, which stalled and
 >>> stymied many things the past 6 years?
 
 >> Perhaps.. but I think representatives in both houses now are VERY
 >> aware of their constituents feelings about the state of this country,
 >> civil rights and more.  I understand Nancy Pelosi, has a 100 hours
 >> plan to bring things back in the swing of things and I also bet she'll
 >> follow through with it.
 
 > I doubt the house in the next 2 years will be making much of a splash, the
 > Senate of the past 6 years has been quite a intestinal blockage and the DEM
 > majority is way weaker, like by only 1.
 
 > We will be seeing lotsa compromises coming through, no ramrodding and
nothing
 > radical.
 
 > There is a reason why the left lost ground in 00,02,04, see if you can
figure
 > that out?
 
 >>> That yours and Rons taxes will likely go up, sure!
 
 >> I guess you'd rather see that deficit continue to grow until it nearly
 >> bankrupts this nation? :)  Our taxes haven't gone down under Bush,
 >> btw. They've gone up..
 
 > The economy would not have rebounded the way it did if we had the left wing
 > inspired tax structure.
 
 >and yes, my taxes did go down, not by much, but no one has the right to tell
m
 > I dont need or need to appreciate the extra monies I see in my net take
home.
 
 > I'd rather have that money for myself, rather than see it go into the
welfare
 > system to fund irresponsible white trailer trash underage females become
baby
 > factories on the public dole.
 
 > Remember the tax cuts were primarily income based cuts, that means people
had
 > more to invest into the economy as in investing into business or by merely
 > being able to purchase more goods and services.. Tax revenue collected from
 > businesses has increased. But you knew that.
 
 > 9-11, the Airline bailout, Katrina werent for free events.
 
 >and nearly all of the taxcuts you bemoan were enacted prior to all above!!!
Bu
 > you knew that.
 
 > The number crunchers in academia said the recession began in March 2001,
 >recessions dont happen overnight much less in 45 days. Bush was only in
office
 >for that long, yet the entire was all his fault to listen to you all. It
wasnt
 >his fault, it was his responsibility to try to fix and he did it. The DJI is
a
 > all time highs, unemployment is way down, even besting Clintonian numbers.
 
 > I will concede that Bush should have vetoed a fair number of congressional
 >spending bills, but with everything that has happened, we still would have
had
 > a deficit, even if he had been more veto concious.
 
 >>>> Democrats, they are _progressive_ Democrats.  Read Chris Bowers
 >>>> comments on mydd.com, or on dailykos.com.
 
 >>> Progressive... C'mon Janis, thats just a word...
 >>> The point is, you can use a million different descriptive words that
 >>> denote if not describe the same thing.
 
 >> No, the point is that those elected are not conservatives.  That is
 >> what's important here.
 

 >>> Continued to next message...

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)