Text 48630, 113 rader
Skriven 2007-03-16 19:04:56 av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
  Kommentar till text 48618 av WAYNE CHIRNSIDE (1:10/345)
Ärende: Your taxes
==================
16 Mar 07 10:49, WAYNE CHIRNSIDE wrote to Roy Witt:

 WC> ->  WC> The administration has announced a new and critical use for
 WC> your ->  WC> tax dollars, another voucher plan.

 WC> ->  WC> This time your tax dollars will fill a critical and necessary
 WC> ->  WC> need, a 40 dollar taxpayer payer subsidized voucher
 WC> ->  WC> for the new high definition T.V. converter boxes

 WC> -> This isn't an administration plan, it's a congressional plan.
 WC> Congress is -> almost over-run with liberals these days, so it's
 WC> their bag.


 WC> The plan was planned and executed and made law by a Republican
 WC> majority congress and is and was a Republicangoal to feather the nest
 WC> ofcorporate America without regards to individuals.

You've heard of Charlie Rangel (sp), right? The subsidies was his idea.

 WC> I oppose cradle to grave government irregardless of party.

Then why do you support the Democrats?

 WC> I oppose a unitary executive branch

That's too bad. You'll have to change the Constitution then.

 WC> I oppose theloss of Constitutional checks and balances.

If they haven't been written out of the Constitution, then they haven't
been lost. The present Constitution reads just like the original, so
nothing has been lost from it.

 WC> I vote the man and not hte party.

I used to be a Democrat. My only regret is that I didn't change
parties sooner.

 WC> Lawton Chiles one time Florida Govenor.

Bring back Jeb...

 WC> Would have voted for Charlie Crist  this last go round had I been
 WC> able.

Bring back Jeb...

 WC> If not the man, I vote the issue.

Wrong two times.

 WC> I've voted Republican, Democrat and Libertarian on the local
 WC> political arena.

I voted for a Democrat once. Then I turned in the ballot for a new one.

 WC> Any who thinks the label Republican or Democrat of even Green
 WC> automatically
 WC> makes that partyu infallible is an idiot and sooner or later willl
 WC> get what is coming to them.

Why? Do they pay them to vote?

 WC> It's coming to yu now but you do not know it.
 WC> Be sure to find someone else to blame for YOUR ignorance.

I admit that I was once ignorant. Then I was born and have been learning
ever since.

 WC> ->  WC> you will need to watch your T.V. in 2009 when
 WC> ->  WC> analog television goes away by federal mandate.

I watch it now, in High Definition. I have a 60" Sony in the den and a 32"
Polaroid (TV, not the camera) in the master-bedroom. I was thinking about
replacing the 28' analog in the guest room, but then I heard that the
Congress is going to give me a 'converter-box' voucher, so I'll probably
keep it a little longer.

 WC> -> Only those on welfare will need the box subsidies.

That would be you.

 WC> I am not on welfare.

OK, SSI. The same thing as welfare. Both are handouts.

 WC> I a on SSDI something I've been elegible for since turning 18 but

I know. The mentally ill are usually on SSI - You do know that SSI is the
same as what you claim to be SSDI?  The 'disability' part of the title
isn't included in official coorespondence. If it's SSI, everyone knows
that you're disabled, or are supposed to be.

 WC> only applied for   after a civil servant negligently run over me on
 WC> my motorcycle crippling me. And then I only applied in order to go to
 WC> school  to return to work. That unfortunately did not come to pass as
 WC> a 16 hit me on my bike returning from school May 12 0f 1995 with
 WC> subsequent failed spinal surgery

You do know that those who're on SSI can work and still receive the
benefits, didn't you? Just because you're mentally retarded doesn't mean
that you're not expected find work.

               R\%/itt



The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but
that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)