Text 8966, 87 rader
Skriven 2005-03-29 09:54:00 av Roy Witt (1:10/22)
   Kommentar till text 8834 av Bjarte Boe (2:211/42)
Ärende: NIMBY
=============
Hello Bjarte.

29 Mar 33 04:16, you wrote to me:

 BB> Hello Roy,

 >>>> Actually, you are wrong. Bjorn was using a DYNDNS lookup based in
 >>>> the USA. That service has to comply with US law, even if the user
 >>>> is in Sweden.
 >>> I mean USA should close their internet service business outside
 >>> USA's border, or USA-laws expires outside U.S.
 >> How much trouble is it to comply with a user agreement?

 BB> While we are installing a program or service made of U.S., there
 BB> came a disclamer agreement or any bullshit, we care to be
 BB> acknowledged by our own law and rights.

You should look at the 70 or so conventions and treaties your country
has signed.

 BB> Not alien (USA for example) laws, and we do not waste our brain do
 BB> know about that!

I see. You waste it on other things?

 BB> U.S. law is seroius complicated and a high risk for information
 BB> owerflow, so we Eurpeean won't concern about that until a political
 BB> crisis at higher plan!

Over your head, so to speak.

 >>> USA is making a worldwide empire while U.S. law involves outside
 >>> USA's border, and I am sure that USA will run the shit of their
 >>> business down in future!
 >> Then you won't have anything to worry about in the near future.

 BB> I hope so that, and it handles about the respect of U.S.!

You should be careful of what you wish for.

 BB> I lived in U.S. for one year, and know much about U.S. and got good
 BB> credits about that.

You couldn't possibly have lived in every part of the US and know
anything about this country.

 BB> But 15 yrs later, it changes my sight. Don't ask me why, you all
 BB> know why.

I have no idea...tell me why.

 >>> It's so unfair since Norway, Sweden, Europe, Russia, and so on
 >>> doesn't have the same law property as USA. Would you like that we
 >>> adopt USA's feature?
 >> No need, all of those you mention already have treaty agreements
 >> which include copyright, drug trafficing, etc...

 BB> Drug trafficing are a more easier problem to tackle outside your
 BB> border, but copyright.. There are different laws,

Like I said, take a look at the 70 or so conventions and treaties your
country has signed. Basing your opinion in Norway's civil law isn't
enough.

 BB>  and some of U.S. ISP provide their services that across your
 BB> borders and the different ISP does have own policy, and so on State
 BB> and Federal regulations.

Very true. And those US ISPs must follow US law. Norwegien law doesn't
matter to them, unless it is in compliance with those 70 or so
conventions and treaties Norway has signed.

 BB>  Then we would be sued the ass of us, without being awared!

Probaly not. You might get a warning, unless you're flagrantly
displaying copyright material on a web site. That would depend on the
user agreement you had to sign to get that service.

 BB> At the point of origin, our culture are different, and I dislike
 BB> the lately development of U.S.

And I dislike the way the EU has been going on about things. Who are you
or I to make a difference?


--- Keep in Touch: ICQ 39-180-954 AIM Z28Krazee
 * Origin: Flying \A/ Ranch, San Antonio, TX (1:10/22)