Text 25979, 89 rader
Skriven 2009-01-12 06:57:42 av Joe Bruchis (1:3828/12.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Pump prices down
========================
Michiel van der Vlist wrote in a message to Joe Bruchis:

 MvdV> Hello Joe,

 MvdV> On Sunday January 11 2009 10:07, you wrote to me:

 MvdV> It is called "fossil fuel" because it has been sitting there for
 MvdV> geological times, not because it comes from dinosaurs. I the
 MvdV> beginning, before there was life, the atmosphere mainly consisted
 MvdV> of CO2. The first life was plant life and CO2 was converted into
 MvdV> organic compounds by fotosyntesis.  Freeing oxygen in the
 MvdV> process. Most of the coal, gas and oil comes from that era. *Way*
 MvdV> befpre the dynosaurs. Animal life only became possible *after* a
 MvdV> substantial amount of the CO2 had been taken out of the
 MvdV> atmosphere and replaced by oxygen. 

I'm not attemptint to insult, only making an observation. I believe you are
holding tight to a viable theory of 30 years ago, but because of age and/or
disinterest, you haven't kept up with your old trade. This happens a lot with
older people. They become set in their thoughts and close thir minds.

You aren't telling me why fossilized bones are found within fossil fuels,
supposedly the same age as the "oil". Also, you haven't explained how wells
that have been drilled dry have suddenly regained pressure. You only stick to
the same theories of 30 years ag.


 JB> In any event, there are vast untapped oil fields in Russia and 
 JB> Alaska
 JB> as well as many other places on Earth, other than the middle east.
 JB> That's without considering the oceans to drill, where there are also
 JB> vast untapped areas.

 MvdV> You are an optimist. Totally ignoring that burning oil, coal and
 MvdV> gas will up the CO2 levels.

Which again, is a good gas, and helps, not hurts the planet?

 MvdV>> So to avoid paying taxes you stick your head in the sand and
 MvdV>> say global warming becuase of CO2 emission is a haox....

  JB> No, it's not to avoid paying taxes. If the CO2 global warming theory
  JB> is a hoax,

 MvdV> It isn't .

Prove it to me.

 MvdV>> Al Gore was not the first to come up with the relation bewteen
 MvdV>> CO2 emission and global warming. Already 30 years ago I was a
 MvdV>> member of a group of scientists who concerned themselves with
 MvdV>> these matters.

 JB> I should have known. (-: So what correlation do you see between CO2
 JB> emmisions and global warming? I have already given my facts that there
 JB> is no correlation. Now show me there is a correlation.

 MvdV> It is there for all to see. Just open your eyes.

I'm supposed to see CO2 gas? I know if the temperature is lowered to the
freezing point I will see it as dry ice. I watched Mr. Wizard too.

 MvdV> Indeed, so why am I talking to you?

Because we're penpals. (-:

 MvdV> I also know that the sun is not the only source of heat that
 MvdV> affects the temperature of the earth. There is fossil heat.
 MvdV> Gravitational energy that was freed during the condensation of a
 MvdV> dust cloud into a planet. IOW, the earth is still cooling off.
 MvdV> And then there is heat from radioactive decay in the earth. 

So it is the heat of "hell" that is causing global warming. That's a way cool
theory dood. 

 MvdV> All these factors are quit constant. They can not explain the
 MvdV> rapid *change* in climate that we are experiencing now.

 MvdV> The coorrelation between rising CO2 levels and rising
 MvdV> temperatures over the last 150 years is telling though.

It's telling there is no correlation.


Regards,

 Joe 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: D'Bridge 3.06 -=[Fire on the Bayou]=- (1:3828/12)