Text 27284, 62 rader
Skriven 2009-02-06 06:49:49 av Joe Bruchis (1:3828/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 27268 av Ward Dossche (2:292/854)
Ärende: Love that sand! (was: Th
================================
Ward Dossche wrote in a message to Lee Lofaso:

LL> Passports are very flammable.  And the airplane, along with all
LL> occupants, were consumed in a very big fireball.
 WD>  
 WD> No it was not.
 WD>  
 WD> An engine was recovered from the debris for example.
 WD>  
 WD> And what is flammable? Paper can burn ... so try to put a lighted
 WD> match to a phonebook and see what happens ... "nothing" ... won't
 WD> burn.  
 WD> From the depth of the oceans suitcases and other objects have been
 WD> recovered from the Titanic wrecksite. In on specific trunk was a
 WD> newspaper from the day the vessel sailed from Southampton ...
 WD> perfectly readable.
 WD>  
 WD> So why would a passport have to burn if e.g. no oxygen could get to
 WD> it?  
 WD> Seems quite plausible to me.

I'm sure the newspaper was wet, though. The Passport was flawlessly clean and
was just laying in a place that could easily be found causing the outcry, "We
have the lead terrorist's passport! We know it was him!".


The beams were actually built in a webbing formation that allows them to
capture an aircraft like a fly. The designers stated outright, there is no way
those planes knocked down those buildings. The temp of burning jet fuel is
about half of what is needed to melt steel. Even if the burning fuel had
weakened a support beam, how did the pool of molten steel collect at the bottom
of the basement of the buildings? The most likely thing, as stated by a number
of demolition experts, is C-4 was previously placed throughout both buildings
and the buildngs were "pulled" creating an in place demolition. C-4 does melt
steel.

These buildings had to come down due to the amount of asbestos in the ceilings.
If one thinks about it, Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC's and the Sears
Tower, had only one chance to recover insurance proceeds on the WTC's. If he
had demolished them himself it would have been a huge expenditure. However, who
knows how many millions in insurance proceeds he received as a result of the
"terrorist attack". The buzz after the attack was, there was "terrorist
chatter" the next target would be the Sears Tower. What a coincidence. Larry
Silverstein is among the wealthiest in the U.S. and has the clout to pull this
off. Given a kickback thrown in to Mayor G., and other high political figures,
and it all makes sense.

With respect to the Pentagon, the hole is so close to the ground, it could not
have been caused by a jet that size, even if it slid into the wall on its
belly.  The reason there is no camera footage is because the FBI immediately
picked up all surveillance tapes around the WTC's and the Pentagon before
anyone could review them. In this day and age, we should have had footage from
every angle, considering the number of security cameras and street cams all
around Manhattan and D.C. However, we saw none of those tapes. A conspicuous
abscence to say the least.
 

Regards,

 Joe 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: D'Bridge 3.06 -=[Fire on the Bayou]=- Nawlins (1:3828/12)