Text 27336, 81 rader
Skriven 2009-02-08 11:08:40 av Joe Bruchis (1:3828/12.0)
  Kommentar till text 27331 av Lee Lofaso (3:800/432.0)
Ärende: Truth About 911
=======================
Lee Lofaso wrote in a message to All:

You know by saying all of this you can be classified as an unlawful enemy
combatant, don't you?

Oh well..nice knowing you. ;0

 LL> Hello Everybody,

 LL> "The most obvious indication that there are no terrorist
 LL> cells is that not a single neocon has been assassinated."
 LL> - Paul Craig Roberts, Information Clearinghouse, 2/4/09

 LL> Most Americans now consider GWB's "War on Terror" a con job. Just
 LL> as more and more Americans are beginning to realize the events of
 LL> 9-11 was a conspiracy.  We have heard about the
 LL> so-called "magic passport".  But other questions remain.
 LL> Here are some of them -

 LL> Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001?
 LL> That is what we have been told.  But does such fiction match
 LL> reality? 

 LL> How many hijackings were attempted?
 LL> We have been told that four hijackings were attempted, all four
 LL> having been successful, with a total of 19 terrorists having taken
 LL> part. Another terrorist was apprehended who never took part in the
 LL> actual hijackings.  Or so we have been told.

 LL> Flight 93 came to an end at 10:03 according to the black box.
 LL> Flight 93 came to an end at 10:06 according to the 911 Commission.
 LL> Why the discrepancy?  Was it because the plane was shot down before
 LL> it actually hit the ground, leaving a trail of debris miles long? 

 LL> How many flights were diverted?

 LL> Why were all relatives of Osama bin Laden allowed to leave
 LL> the country, by plane, immediately after the events of 9-11? 

 LL> Is Osama bin Laden a fake?  We know Abraham Lincoln wore a fake
 LL> beard.  Why not Osama bin Laden?  Assuming there is such a person
 LL> as Osama bin Laden.  Think about it.  If Osama bin Laden did not
 LL> exist, GWB would have had to invent him.

 LL> What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC7, which was not
 LL> hit by a plane?  Could it be that the cause of the collapse of the
 LL> WTC Twin Towers was not the result of planes hitting them, but
 LL> rather as a result of controlled demolitions (explosives)? 

 LL> The hypotheses of the WTC Twin Towers collapsing as a result of
 LL> impacts from planes is unprovable, given the lack of forensic
 LL> evidence, and total reliance on dubious computer models - none of
 LL> which were used to even test for the possibility of explosives. Why
 LL> not clear this up?  Oh, that's right.  No need.  Tell a lie often
 LL> enough and people will begin to believe it...

 LL> There are lots of other questions that remain unanswered.
 LL> Probably because there is no credible defense of the official
 LL> version.

 LL> Here are 40 reasons to doubt the official version -

 LL> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

 LL> Have fun trying to come up with a credible defense of the
 LL> official version of the events of September 11, 2001.  :)

 LL> --Lee


 LL>  * SLMR 2.1a * Hello, I am part number ||X||||X||X||X||

 LL> ___ Maximus 3.01
 LL>  - Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.thebbs.org
 LL> (3:800/432) 

Regards,

 Joe 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: D'Bridge 3.06 -=[Fire on the Bayou]=- Nawlins (1:3828/12)