Text 28932, 168 rader
Skriven 2009-03-11 13:46:16 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
     Kommentar till en text av Roy Witt (1:397/22)
Ärende: OK, Vlist claims that there is no God! LOL!
===================================================
Hello Roy,

On Tuesday March 10 2009 14:23, you wrote to me:

 MvdV>> I made no such claim. reading comprehension Roy. What I wrote
 MvdV>> was:

 MvdV>>>>> So no, it does not look like the Jews are smarter.

 RW> But they are, as I pointed out to you by example.

Your example is unconvincing.

 MvdV>> Hardly. What else is he know for other than his theory of light
 MvdV>> emission on and his theories of relativity?

 RW> The first fluctuation dissipation theorem which explained the Brownian
 RW> movement of molecules, just for starters.

Try your smoke screenon someone else Roy. I don;t fall for it. Brownian motion
was already explained by... Brown.

 MvdV>> The fact is Roy that after his theories of relativity he did
 MvdV>> not much more than just being famous.

 RW> Well, that too comes with the territory.

Fame is not proof of geniality.

 MvdV>> They choose Einstein as their idol because he got so much
 MvdV>> publicity over a theory that they did not understand.

 RW> Which goes against the grain of Einstein's biographer's theory.

Too bad for the theory.

 MvdV>> The scientifically literate know better. The special theory of
 MvdV>> relativity is not hard at all to understand for anyone with a
 MvdV>> bachelor in physics. The real beauty is that it is so extremey
 MvdV>> simple!

 RW> Yes, but even more, it was never known in all the history of the world
 RW> until Einstein came up with it.

So was the theory of bouyancy until Archimed came uo with it. Or Boyle's law
unil Boyle came up with it. Or the laws of Keppler until Keppler came up with
it. Your point?

 MvdV>> Quantum mechanics and string theory are a lot harder to fathom.

 RW> No doubt.

There you go.

 MvdV>> So? Because they act as lemmings, does it mean that they are
 MvdV>> not wrong in their beliefs?

 RW> They're not acting as lemmings but in fact, are following what has
 RW> been taught by those who were told about it in the first place.

And those who were told about it in the first place were told by whom?

 MvdV>>>> And who decides what are the "real" orthgodox Muslims?

 RW>>> The original orthodox Muslims.

 MvdV>> Of course. Another self declared truth.

 RW> They had to start somewhere.

There was no need to start at all.

 MvdV>>>> Seems to me they have the same problem as the myriad of
 MvdV>>>> Christinan branches that all claim the they and only they are
 MvdV>>>> the true believers.

 RW>>> They all believe in the same God,

 MvdV>> Or so they believe..

 RW> They even say so. The God who instructed David (Hebrew) to confront
 RW> and kill Goliath (arab-philistine) was the same God who the Muslims
 RW> pray to today.

Says you. But you fail to provide proof.

 RW> Reading comprehension I guess. They take the word and make it their
 RW> own. As you know, what goes around, soon comes around, but you won't
 RW> recognize it because it has passed through so many hands, it has
 RW> changed from its original state to something you don't recognize.

 MvdV>> Seems like a stupid strategy, to encourage the worshippers to
 MvdV>> kill each other.

 RW> I don't know that they do. Is that your interpretation?

Not "they",  HIM. The God that allows his worshippers to fight each other.

 MvdV>>>> The Christians that have more than one wife believe it has
 MvdV>>>> the fiat of their God of course.

 RW>>> There was never an order by God to polygamize.

 MvdV>> Tere was never an order against it either.

 RW> Yes, there was.

Not according to thoese who believe otherwise.

 MvdV>> People have been ignoring the law of the land when it souits
 MvdV>> them and they think they cab get away with ever since there
 MvdV>> were laws of the land.

 RW> They are still stoned to death for it in Muslim lands today.

Only when caught. Since not all ara caught, there will always be people who
think they cabn get away with breaking the law.

 RW> I've seen the footage of an Iranian princess who was stoned to death
 RW> for committing adultry, as was her partner in that adultry.

Which proves my point. The law does not stop it, it merely discourages.

 MvdV>>>> The sin is only in the eyes of the others who believe God
 MvdV>>>> will only sanction mmonogameus mariages.

 RW>>> 1 Timothy 3:2, " A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of
 RW>>> one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to
 RW>>> hospitality, apt to teach;"

 MvdV>> That applies to the bishop, not to the flock.

 RW> That applies to the flock as the bishop (Paul) used himself as an
 RW> example. Although he never married.

According to Paul... Others believe different.

 RW>>> Ahhh yes, the Village Idiot.

 MvdV>> Even the village idiot has the right of free speech.

 RW> So much so that he can refer to himself the Village Idiot. Which Gogh
 RW> did.

Free speech implies the roight to call oneself an idiot.

 RW>>>  he was an assassination waiting to happen.

 MvdV>> Then so are you.

 RW> Anyone willing to try is welcome. I havn't killed anyone in self
 RW> defense for two decades.

So how many did you kill before that?

 MvdV>> Especially if you always win.

 RW> Now that's something to think about. Is heaven so perfect that there
 RW> are no losers?

Is that a question you leave for me to answer or a question you do not know the
answer to?


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)