Text 33714, 79 rader
Skriven 2009-06-25 01:25:58 av Jeff Smith (1:14/5)
  Kommentar till text 33581 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
Ärende: Saberi vs Blom
======================
Hello Michiel.

22 Jun 09 18:02, you wrote to me:

 MV> Hello Jeff,

 MV> On Saturday June 20 2009 17:40, you wrote to me:

 MV>>> Like the people that will be killed by one of your guns if you
 MV>>> are not stopped? C'mon Jeff, the children in the US were in no
 MV>>> more danger to be molested than the people in The Netherlands
 MV>>> are in danger of being killed by your guns.

 JS>>    Not even a close comparison Michiel.

 MV> I beg to differ. Here gun addicts are considered dangerous. They can
 MV> kill people with their guns. That is why we have made laws to restrict
 MV> gun addicts. But we do not go so far as to lure gun addicts people
 MV> from other countries into our jurisdiction so that they can be stopped
 MV> too.

    So... Anyone owning or wanting to own a gun is a gun addict. I always
thought an addict was someone with a compulsive desire. If so that leaves
me a non-addict. Sorry Michiel. Here some are gun collectors. They do
feel the desire to buy rare or unique firearms. But usually rarely if
ever fire them. Are they automatically addicts? It's soo easy isn't it
Michiel to label anyone that differs from YOUR idea of what is right an
addict. He owns a gun so he MUST be an addict.  Get real Michiel.


 JS>>>>  Blom was trying to have sex with what he thought was a child.

 MV>>> Wrong.

 JS>>    Hardly. Blom came to the US with the desire to have sex with a
 JS>> child. Blom communicated with someone he thought was a child.

 MV> No, Blom ciommunicated with what IN YOUR PERCEPTION was a child.

    As well as his. If someone portrays themself as a child online and
and others online respond. Who are those people responding to? The child
that they see online or the non-child that they are not aware of? Blom
responded to the child that he thought he was communicating with. At
what point did the LEO announce or make Blom aware that he was communicating
with an adult let alone a adult LEO? Your claim Michiel that Blom didn't
think he was contacting a child isn't supported by the reality of what
happened.

 JS>> Blom sent pictures of himself to this "Child". He obviously
 JS>> thought he he was communicating with a child. Blom arrainged a
 JS>> meeting with this "Child". These were all Blom's actions in
 JS>> trying to satisfy his sexual desires regarding children.

 MV> Your repeated mention of the word "child" does not prove that Blom
 MV> thought he was trying top have sex with a chikd. It only proves that
 MV> YOU think he thought that.

    Blom's actions show who he thought he was contacting. Yor constant
denial doesn't change that one little bit.


 MV>>>  The child exists in your mind and those who prosecuted him.

    And don't forget Blom now. <g>

 JS>>    Your attempts in trying to blame everyone but Blom for HIS
 JS>> actions isnt working Michiel. Blom made the decisions

 [...]

 MV> Cheers, Michiel

 MV> --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 MV>  * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)

Jeff

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 * Origin: Twin_Cities_Metronet - region14.us (1:14/5)