Text 907, 130 rader
Skriven 2007-05-04 19:17:20 av Herman Neut (2:280/1141)
    Kommentar till text 899 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
Ärende: Shootings
=================
Hi Ross,


   Quoting: Ross Cassell to Herman Neut
 Date/Time: 04-May-07 / 09:36:52
   Subject: Shootings


 HN>> @MSGID: 2:280/1141 05c6742c
 HN>> @REPLY: 63295.fidonews@1:249/303 0aa0c90d
 HN>> @PID: TerMail 5/Pro ffdca2c37b
 HN>> @CHRS: IBMPC 2
 HN>> @TZUTC: 0200

 RC> These are your header control info for this very message I am replying
 RC> to..

Yep. And what?
What should exact be in the header kludges according the FP?

What and how should exactly be configured in the MSGID kludge??
Is a MSGID kludge compulsory??

 JD>>> Seems to me I saw his own Zone 2 node number in it, like you
 JD>>> always, or mostly, do.

 HN>> ====QUOTE====

 HN>> -!- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
 HN>>  @ Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South Texas * USA
 HN>> (2:280/1141)

 HN>> ====unquote=====

 HN>> What's in an Origin line? What are the requirements?

 RC> At bare minimum just the node number, on this point your message isnt a
 RC> real  forgery, just a lame attempt to look like one


Whahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!! :-)))))))))))))))))))).
It is ONLY _my_ nodenumber that counts, dear Ross

 RC> However:


 RC> === Cut ===
 RC> = FN_SYSOP (1:123/456)
 RC> ========================================================
 RC>  Msg  : 973 of 976
 RC>  From : NimrOdh Shinar                      1:397/22        03 May 07
 RC> 08:41:56
 RC>  To   : Bermah Shaeve
 RC>  Subj : FYI, There Is A Moderator!!
 RC>
 RC> ==========================================================================
=====
 RC> *@MSGID: 1:397/22 46390ced
 RC> *@PID: GED+W32 snapshot-2002.9.29
 RC> *@CHRS: CP437 2
 RC> *@REPLY: 1:397/22@FidoNet 7c74c579
 RC> *@TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 8614


And so what?

I just was showing RW his daily behaviour in Fidonet.
All his BS should be responded by crash netmail to his TwitFilter
:-))))))

And:
Want to see how many MSGs have a MSGID kludge?
Want to see how many different formats in the MSGID kludges are used?

There seems to be _no_ standard

AND:

What ROY can do, can I do too!!!!


 RC> [..]
 RC> === Cut ===

 RC> (Asterisks placed in by me manually)

Well, did you? I would never have noticed that :-))))))

Very clever of you, Rossi, to found out I have copied and pasted RW his
header kludges. His tearline and the text in his origin too.
I _could_ even have copied his nodenumber into the origin line, but I did NOT

And what I did,  could be moticed by every fido user.

What is your BIG point???

 RC> This is what was found in the control info of your message.

 RC> Most readers will use the control info to ascertain the reply address, in
 RC> this
 RC> case someone wanting to send a netmail response to that message would be
 RC> sending
 RC> said response to Roy, even tho you are the true author and origination of
 RC> the
 RC> message


And that is wrong!

The adress in the origin line counts and should be used.

What about a MSGID kludge like 27381.fidobox@1:xyz/nnn 3672d23e ?
Or no MSGID at all ( e.g. Shannon Talley)?



The MSG you are referring to has loud and clear my node number as the sender
identification.

Speaking about "childish play", you and your buddy are playing every day
little boy games.


Best Regards,
      Herman Neut

 e-mail: h.neutnospam@hccnet.nl

--- Terminate 5.00/Pro & BinkD/0.9.7-stable/Powered by WinXP
 * Origin: Ster in Twente -Haaksbergen-The Netherlands (2:280/1141)