Text 18458, 64 rader
Skriven 2011-05-09 14:32:54 av Michiel van der Vlist (2:280/5555)
  Kommentar till text 18413 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
Ärende: I wanna!
================
Hello Ross,

On Sunday May 08 2011 21:03, you wrote to me:

 RC>>>>> What made Blom alter travel plans?

 MV>>>> The invitation from the "girl" of course.

 RC>>> and what was he going to do with her and where?

 MV>> Since there was no "girl": nothing.

 RC> But had there been one...

There wasn't one. Period.

 RC> You carry on as if that pervert knew he was talking to a sheriffs
 RC> deputy.

He WAS talking to a sheriff's deputy...

 RC> If he had zero intentions of molesting a child he would not have
 RC> placed himself in that Chicago motel.

He would not bee in that hotel had there been no invitation from the "girl".

 MV>> He is not /my/ pervert, he is my fellow citizen. If he is
 MV>> anyone's pervert, it is /your/ pervert since you labelled him so.

 RC> He is very much /your/ pervert since you justify his actions.

I defend him, not to justify his actions, I defend him because he is my fellow
citizen and he was doing nothing here that would have gotten him into problems
with the law.

Yet, you stretched your dirty claws out to him. You had no business doing that.
The Netherlands is a sovereign country. Is is US and US ALONE that decide what
is legal here. It is US and US ALONE that decide what is moral here. Not Roy
Witt, Ross Cassel or some deputy sheriff in Chicago.

Stretching out your dirty claws into our jurisdiction to meddle with one of our
law abiding citizens is a breach of sovereignty and a prime example of you
attempting to ram your morals down our throat.

THAT is what I ahbor and that is why I defend Menno Blom.

 MV>> It is not my position that he had no choice. My position is that
 MV>> it was immoral to offer him the choice in the first place.
 MV>> Offering someone the choice to do something that in the eye of
 MV>> the one who offers the choice is a crime, is soliciting. If the
 MV>> object is to apprehend the victim while committing the crime it
 MV>> is entrapment. Entrapment is illegal and immoral.

 RC> and molesting children isnt immoral?

No child was molested.

SWomeone WAS was the victim of entrapment though.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)