Text 21916, 44 rader
Skriven 2011-08-22 23:33:58 av Richard Webb (1:116/901.0)
  Kommentar till text 21891 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: new
===========
Hi Mark,

On Mon 2011-Aug-22 13:40, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to Gary Perkins:

FIrst, shoulda addressed this to Gary.
<big snip>

ml> ummm... yeah... the above also depends on one's mailer... some of
ml> them have no clue about direct mail flavors/flags... i am attempting
ml> to break this down a bit because the BSO style uses the ?LO files...
ml> in recent times they have recognized the immediate status (ILO
ml> files) but they cannot combine things to have immediate direct and
ml> such... BSO mailers have to rely on the routing capabilities of
ml> their mailtosser... dynamic mailers, on the other hand, handle all
ml> the routing and transfers themselves... they can easily perform
ml> tasks like this that BSO systems have troubles doing... especially
ml> when they have the ability to rescan the raw netmail directory and
ml> build the outbound netmail packets at any time whereas BSO systems
ml> have to physically unpack the bundles and then repack them...

Right, I didn't think Binkleyterm recognized immediate
either.  For Gary's benefit, a couple years ago I did a
series in Fidogazette on the differences between static and
dynamic mailers which may help him understand some of it.

 GP> I'm thinking about contacting some of the more quiet sysops around
 GP> the world and doing a Q&A.  If anyone else wants to do a column on
 GP> that,  feel free to volunteer. :)

ml>          No Soliciting
ml>         Beware of Gator
ml>      Rottwieller has own GUN
ml>   Rottwieller is trained SNIPER
ml>        Enter at OWN RISK
ml>       Watch for LANDMINES

My rottweiler resembles them, but she's a cream puff, it's
the human ya gotta watch out for <g>.


Regards,
           Richard
---
 * Origin:  (1:116/901)