Text 7856, 90 rader
Skriven 2010-05-15 16:18:59 av Roy Witt (1:387/22)
   Kommentar till text 7824 av Robert Bashe (2:2448/44)
Ärende: Belgium
===============
14 May 10 13:50, Robert Bashe wrote to Roy Witt:

 RB> Roy Witt wrote to Robert Bashe on Thursday May 13 2010 at 19:39:

 RW>>>> For one thing, it is not, I repeat NOT a practice of the Muslim
 RW>>>> religion, so you're barking up the wrong tree with that notion.

 RB>>> "It" presumably being female "circumcision" and not the burka,
 RB>>> which you were referring to in your first sentence.

 RW>> Yes, I see that your hypocracy doesn't stop with the muslim dress
 RW>> code.

 RB> Roy Witt, the American champion of female "circumcision"... "Honestly
 RB> bigotted", but _never_ hypocritical.

You're so full of shit, it now runs down your chin and onto your
keyboard. Hypocrite.

 RB>>> And I'm perfectly aware of the fact that it is not a part of Islam
 RB>>> even without your help, but have never claimed that either.

 RW>> Coulda fooled me.

 RB> It helps to read more than you write, instead of the reverse.

Keep that in mind when you assume what others are saying.

 RB>>> However, the fact remains that the practice is concentrated in
 RB>>> Muslim countries and Black Africa.

 RW>> One of the common misconceptions is to connect female circumcision
 RW>> with the teachings of Islam. It may happen in an Islamic country,
 RW>> but then it can't be said that it doesn't happen in christian
 RW>> countries as well.

 RB> You really _don't_ read what's written, do you?

I'm following your example.

 RB>>> Draw your own conclusions.

 RW>> See above.

 RB> Either you can't read or you ignore what's read - or turn it
 RB> backwards - to try to impress others with your own egomania.

See above.

 RW>>>> Rather than teach them (not muslims) the errors of their ways, you
 RW>>>> would ban them to hell before offering them an education in the
 RW>>>> errors of their ways. Most believers in FGC are ignorant people
 RW>>>> who need the help.

 RW>>>> But I see that your help would be to discriminate against them.

 RB>>> So your answer would be to make female "circumcision" legal in the
 RB>>> USA?

 RW>> Your English in-comprehension is showing again.

 RB> Jusat taking your words to the logical conclusion.

Jusat?  Wonderful, now you're creating bullshit that no one can call you
hypocritical about.

 RB>>> That's right, Roy - do an about-face when others turn the tables on
 RB>>> you and use your own methods on you ;-)

 RW>> Unlike yourself, I don't worry who gets the upper hand, as long as
 RW>> I'm in the right.

 RB> Unlike you, I don't always assume I'm in the right,

Instead, you know it...LOL!

 RB>  regardless of
 RB> what subject. Unlike you, I don't always insist on being right,
 RB> regardless of the facts.

 RB> Yes, we are indeed different in many respects.

It's a good thing you didn't remain in Texas, they'd probably ban you to
Germany. Who knows, maybe they did.

                R\%/itt

    You can put lipstick on a pig, but the pig still stinks!
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10
 * Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:387/22)