Text 21120, 86 rader
Skriven 2015-02-14 19:02:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av WARD DOSSCHE
Ärende: Re: Global Warming Scam
===============================
On 02-13-15, WARD DOSSCHE said to TIM RICHARDSON:

TR> ICE BREAKER RUSHES TO FREE STRANDED FISHING VESSEL STUCK IN THICK
TR> ANTARCTIC ICE!!


WD>The reports are a clear case of journalists needing to fill their column.


Yeah, well....while you're chewing on the last helping of `crow' I served up
to you and your `warmist' friends this morning....here's something for your
`dessert';


They're saying a `hurricane' like storm will hit New England this weekend.


I have several discriptions of the snow-storm conditions under photos of
horrendous snow coverings of homes, fire hydrants, parked cars....


Oh and...there's a story out there outlining pretty much exactly what I've
been posting about in here lately;


It speaks of the NOAA `adjusting' temperatures `upward' to give the impression
that this was `the warmest year'......


Which raises one of the questions I've asked in here....but nobody seems to
know the answer to:


If `global warming' is so real....why the need to `adjust temperatures
upward'?


In fact....why the need to `adjust temperatures' at all?


Raw weather station data has been `adjusted' to make the 1930's appear cooler
than they were...and the present day `warmer'!


And nobody seems to be able to explain that. Can you?


Here's a paragraph from the article I'm referencing:


"If the temperature records on which the entire edifice of the international
global warming industry is based are a busted flush then we have all been
victims of a scam so vast and all-encompassing it makes Enron look like a
model of modesty and integrity."


Like I said; a scam. A big con game. The biggest scientific joke since
`phlogiston'!


WD>Love the dramatic tone, but there's nothing dramatic about it.


You can `belittle' it....`insult me' over it...high-five each other over your
`put-downs' aimed at me over it all you like.


But you cannot answer a couple of simple questions on it:


If its so real....why the need to `adjust' data to make it appear to be real?

If its so `real'....shouldn't the data stand on its own without need of
`adjustment'?


Curious minds would like to know.






---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail  Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org  (1:123/140)