Text 35231, 69 rader
Skriven 2016-07-27 21:21:28 av Tim Richardson (6663.fidonews)
  Kommentar till text 35205 av Joe Delahaye (61673.fidonews)
Ärende: Re: No Restrictions
===========================
 >   Re: No Restrictions
 >   By: Janis Kracht to Joe Delahaye on Wed Jul 27 2016 11:27:18

 >  >> Yet she is not the only Secretary of State to do so.  It is, or at
 >  >> least was, not against State Department policy, nor against the law to
 >  >> use your own server.

 >  JK> You are wrong Joe. She is the only one to use her own email server.
 >  JK> Colin Powell used email, but NOT his own email server because the gov't
 >  JK> had not set that up yet.

 > Colin Powell used a private email server, and the fact remains the the State
 > Dept had no formal rules regarding how emails were to be sent.  I would
 > suppose that has changed by now.  At least I would hope so.
 
Colin Powell wasn't sending top secret and stuff so sensitive it was far
ABOVE top secret, stuff to and from people.

If he had and it came out, he'd have been `prosecuted'.

General Petraeus was prosecuted for doing far less than Clinton did. 

Even the FBI director in his `non condemnation' condemnation of what Clinton
did made a tacit (if not outright) case for what she'd done being wrong.

She wasn't charged and prosecuted because she is Hillary Clinton, and no 
other reason! 



 >  JK> Hillary contends they were not hacked.. How does Guccifer have her
 >  JK> emails if they were NOT hacked???

 > I have not heard of any of HER emails being out there.  The DNC emails yes,
 > but that is not hers.

If the Russians have anything she had on her private servers it won't come
tumbling out like these DNC emails. Their info will be milked clean by the
Russians, just like the info on the drives that wound up in the hands of 
the Chinese in Bill's 8 year intelligence leak....er...I mean `a
`administration'! 

 >  JK> You are buying into the Clinton-mystique.. open your eyes, read some
 >  JK> history regarding what Bill Clinto actually did to this country and the
 >  JK> world.. It was his administration that drastically weakened the safety
 >  JK> nets in this country.
 
In a rare instance....she's right about that.
 
 > Didnt seem so to the rest of the world.  Bill Clinton left you with a
 > surplus,

That's crap! That's like you paying your bills each month, you've got an
enormous debt....so you short this one and that one for the month and only
make partial payments on your bills....and telling yourself you have a `
`surplus' this month! There was no *surplus*. There was an accounting trick
that was a fast-talk of numbers ending with the claim `there's a surplus'!
There wasn't any `surplus'. A `surplus' is when all your debts are paid off,
you're able to pay your normal bills without `barrowing' to meet them, and
the money left can be called `a surplus'. As long as we have a mountain of
debt like we do...there IS no `surplus'!

 > when he left office, unlike his successor, who was rather hawkish
 > and started a war that is still raging to this day.
 
GW Bush didn't "started a war"....the Islamics did! Don't they get news up
there? Read some recent history
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- telnet://livewirebbs.com (1:2320/100)