Text 35539, 65 rader
Skriven 2016-08-01 15:16:38 av Tim Richardson (5278.fidonews)
Ärende: Re: No Restrictions
===========================
 >  >  > > Some idiot leftist babe who was in college at the time (law school,
 >  >  > > no less) testified in front of a Congressional committee in favor of
 >  >  > > birth control being paid for by taxpayers (something to do with the
 >  >  > > Obamacare thing in progress at the time).
 >  >  > > She `claimed' (and I was watching the hearing on CNN at the time) to
 >  >  > > have over 300 sex partners per year! And she was adamant that
 >  >  > > *taxpayer-paid* insurance should pay for both HER birth control AND
 >  >  > > abortion, should she need one.

 >  >  > Anyone want to put money on the accuracy of this account?

 >  > She testified before a Congressional Committee (Nancy Pelosi put her up
 >  > to it even).

 >  > Her name was Sandra Fluke. And she was the left's poster girl for
 >  > taxpayer funded abortion and birth control.

 > Had to shell out a minute to find something.

 > Ok...here's the `skinnie':

 > Back when the debate in Congress over whether or not to include birth
 > control in the ACA, Fluke (a law student at Georgetown University....(which
 > is a `Catholic' university) was invited by democrats to speak before the
 > House Oversight and Government Reform committee.
 > At the time they were debating the administration's new rules on `Conscience
 > Clause' exception's to health care.

 > The democrats wanted Fluke added to the first panel of witnesses, which was
 > composed mainly of clergy, theologians, etc.

 > Darrell Issa (the chairman) refused because Fluke had no expertise in the
 > matter, was not a member of the clergy, and her name had not been submitted
 > in time.

 > Nancy Pelosi went to work behind the scenes and fanagled an invitation to
 > Fluke to speak before the House *Democrat* Steering and Policy committee,
 > and she did so.

 > She spoke of Georgetown `should be compelled to offer contraceptive drugs
 > without a co-pay' in spite of Georgetown's moral opposition to artificial
 > birth control.

 > She further stated that, during her time as a law student, birth control
 > could cost as much as (get ready, folks) $3000 a year!

 > I did the math.....


 > At the time she said  that, the *average* price for over-the-counter birth
 > control substances was right bout $8.00! 

 > But....lets give her the benefit of the doubt and say $10.00!
 
And by the way....that cost wasn't for just a single sex act, folks. That
was for a full thirty day supply! (I checked that out back then)

So...for it to have cost her $3000 a year? Who the hell was she buying it
from? At $10 a month (at most) it couldn't have cost more than $120 for a
whole year!

So either (as Limbaugh said) she WAS a `slut'...or (as I thought and still do)
she's a bald-faced liar!
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
 * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- telnet://livewirebbs.com (1:2320/100)