Text 3763, 68 rader
Skriven 2012-09-10 13:38:50 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Nick Andre
Ärende: Users an extinct spe
============================
ML> MSGID is only one method and it *is* the most accurate since the
ML> other fact
ML> in the headers, message bodies, and trailing control lines can be
ML> damaged o
ML> altered... yes, the MSGID can be also but it is much less likely to be...

 NA> But it CAN be altered, right?

erroneously, just like everything else... so there's your out :rolleyes:

ML>  NA> because you  have been well aware of my lack-of-MSGID since I've
ML>  NA> became a downlink. Since  the problem appears to be isolated to
ML>  NA> this echo, 
ML> 
ML> what makes you think that the problem is isolated to this echo? it
ML> is not..
ML> see them in the dbridge echo as well... possibly another one or
ML> two but i'v
ML> not gone digging too deep in my dupes message area to find out...
ML> i just kn
ML> they were there before my midnight maint purged them...

 NA> LOL you're killing me. Reputable systems produce the occasional
 NA> dupes at one time or another.  Dig deep in your dupes and your
 NA> mountains of messages and notes you take to attempt to discredit
 NA> everything I do, as if I care. 

i don't do this stuff to try to discredit you or anyone else, nick... i never
have... generally speaking i only do that when there's a bunch of crap being
spewed that is patently false... and i already told you that the dupes are
purged every night... hell, the only reason i even saw them in the first place
is because they were addressed to me and my private mail scan dutifully showed
them to me which was like deja vu because i had just recently seen and replied
to them...

 NA> I will add MSGID here to Renegade when I have the time and
 NA> inclination to do  so since (A) Apparently I missed the memo that
 NA> says MSGID is required in all my posts and (B) I will not be roped
 NA> into a silly arguement about MSGID's and  (C) I do not feel like
 NA> arguing with Ross as I respect him and he has been  generous enough
 NA> to let me abuse his Areafix for my own testing in the past. 

 NA> Happy now?

don't do it to make me happy, man... i don't care one way or the other...

ML>  NA> do you not think the problem  may not be with your system but with 
ML>  NA> my uplink for Fidonews? Why not approach  that person logically 
ML>  NA> and politely as you have done so in this thread? 
ML> 
ML> does that person carry all the echos you carry? does that person's
ML> system h
ML> a systemic problem that causes messages to be duped or
ML> non-duplicate messag
ML> to be caught as dupes due to some alteration of data in those messages?

 NA> See above.

as long as you know that they are still spewing out... why it is only your
posts from your system i do not know but they are... it is very possibly due to
the gonads boner thing and their multiple intertwined links not stopping
dupes... supposedly they are using sophisticated software that can validate a
message by its header and such in the same or similar way that DB can or
does... but then again, maybe they are not...

)\/(ark

 * Origin:  (1:3634/12)