Text 873, 47 rader
Skriven 2012-07-18 21:31:53 av Nicholas Boel (10875.fidonews)
    Kommentar till text 870 av mark lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Netmail to you not sent!                   was: .fidonet
================================================================
  Re: Netmail to you not sent!                   was: .fidonet
  By: mark lewis to Nicholas Boel on Wed Jul 18 2012 09:21 pm

 >  NB> Every statement you're making by saying that the MSGID should only
 >  NB> contain the  node number of said network
 > 
 > i've never said it should only contain the node number of the machine in
 > the network... you are not reading and following along properly :(

But there's where your senility comes in. You've said on plenty of occasions 
that there should only be two parts, the node number, and the reference 
number. I'm reading and following along just fine, Mark. You're just 
forgetting what you're saying!
 
 > read the spec... it SHOULD be a proper return address for the ORIGINATING
 > NETWORK...

Like Rob said. "Should" is not "must" or "required". Maybe you should request 
a revision?

 > i'm not trying to cover a god damned thing... neither am i trying to
 > backpedal out of anything... and truth be known, this is also exactly why
 > the problem still exists... folk get sick and tired of pointing the
 > contrary flaws and the broken interaction that they give up and let the
 > id10ts go one being the ignorant id10ts they apparently want to be... sorry
 > you don't get that or understand it...

You're running me in circles, Mark. This is getting real old, real fast. Tell 
you what, I'm going to be the ignorant id10t that wants fun and good 
conversation out of this whole ordeal. I'm not going to nitpick, and I'm not 
going to bitch and moan about every little aspect of this hobby, either. Going 
back and forth with you the past few days is making me feel like my life is 
being slowly drained out of me for no apparant reason. Do you see the affect 
you have on people, Mark? Thanks for that.

Now until you change some wording in your fuckin' standards, or prove to me 
where Synchronet is not compliant with specs, OUTSIDE of your own stupid 
opinion.. Noone's going to listen to your opinions, because right now that's 
all they are. Opinions.

--
Nick aka axisd
(http) www.pharcyde.org
(telnet) bbs.pharcyde.org

--- SBBSecho 2.13-Linux
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)