Text 15084, 29 rader
Skriven 2011-05-10 22:00:22 av Maurice Kinal (1:261/38.9)
  Kommentar till text 15082 av Mark Lewis (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: the proof is in the pudding
===================================
Hey Mark!

 ML> PID/TID + tearline == fail :/

Whose?  Yours or mine?  Hm.  I don't see a tearline in yours.  What
happened to it?  I do see the TID and PID kludges though as shown below;

 ML> ^APID: timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
 ML> ^ATID: FastEcho 1.46.1 7617

The '@' character doesn't show up in the original since in vim it is
displayed as '^A' which corresponds with 0x01 in hex.  Beats me where
your DOS editor is getting the '@' character from.  Shouldn't that be
0x40?  Where did you find that editor?  Tsk, tsk.  Definetly not up to
ASCII standards is it?

Beats me what happened to your tearline.  Looks to be MIA from this
angle.  Is it just me?

Comparing the two - my reply to Robert with the nano editor and your
reply to that reply - I am content that the WeBeBashing method is
superior no matter what standards are applied.  That is my current story
and I am sticking to it ... for now.  :::evil grin:::

Life is good,
Maurice

--- WeBeBashing v0.0.0-rc0 (unsupported)
 * Origin: Pointy Stick Society (1:261/38.9)