Text 8678, 103 rader
Skriven 2006-12-19 02:07:00 av Ed Hulett
     Kommentar till en text av Maurice Kinal
Ärende: here again
==================
 MSGID: 1:123/789.0 45878f9e
 REPLY: 1:261/38.9 45867d0b
 REPLYADDR kc7flr@arrlINVALID.net
 PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1
 TZUTC: -0500
 TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Maurice Kinal -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MK> Hey Ed!

 MK> Dec 18 04:41 06, Ed Hulett wrote to Maurice Kinal:

 MK>>> Hm again.  : --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413

 MK>>> Looks like you aren't.

 EH>> GoldED+ isn't a BBS.

 MK> Yes I know.  That is why I said "Looks like you aren't" instead.  Seems
 MK> he is full of talk with no action.  I doubt his BBS is all that more
 MK> linuxie.

Maybe he accesses his Linux BBS through one of his M$ boxen.

 EH>> His NNTP server doesn't connect to the WWW or Usenet. You should know
 EH>> that WWW and NNTP aren't related. They are two seperate protocols.

 MK> Yep.  Doesn't stop them from spreading it there though.  I've seen them.

Hahahahahaha!!!!

The 'spreading' isn't through Ross' system.

 EH>> I suppose it isn't Linux until it's Slack in your opinion.

 MK> One of the few still hanging in there.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

It must be a small world you live in.

 EH>> I was running Slackware back in 95 and have run Debian, Red Hat and
 EH>> Suse since then.

 MK> That is about the same time I started Linuxing.  I tried all those too.
 MK> Still find Slackware to be the most Unixie Linux distribution.  I guess
 MK> I got spoiled.

Spoiled? More like hung up in your elitist attitude.

 EH>> Your unreasonable hatred for M$ users is duely noted and considered
 EH>> humorous.

 MK> I don't hate them.  They can keep their so-called OS as I don't care.

ALL OSes suck. Even Unix. Some suck more than others, but there is no perfect
OS.

 MK> They're the ones who have to try and make it work, not me.

"Try?" I've had WinNT, Win2K, and WinXP boxes up for months on end without
problems. I have never had a virus. I've seen Linux and Solaris boxes crash
just as much as M$.

 EH>> And your supreme judgement is devined to you... how?

 MK> Observation.  Ross has contributed nothing of substance here whereas
 MK> Wayne has.  Wayne obviously wins.

Hahahahahahahaha!!!!

All that Wayne has "contrubuted" has been an endless string of whines about his
supposed stroke.

 EH>> Nice anecdotal story. I've heard it before from someone who has never
 EH>> been in FIDO.

 MK> He was never in Fido to my knowledge.

How did I hear the story before if not from you?

 EH>> Good for you. Win3.1 was well over a decade ago. Also, just how did
 EH>> Win3.1 take down a LAN. Win3.11 was the network aware version.

 MK> Right.  Bad Win3.1 floppies took it down.  Not much of a network that
 MK> can be totally eradicated by a non-networking version of the same
 MK> lameware eh?  I wish I would have been there to see it happen.

Just how did the floppies take down an entire LAN if the box they were used in
was network unaware? Win3.1 doesn't even acknowledge if a NIC is installed. Are
you saying that the virus was written so it had the correct NIC driver as part
of the code? Do tell.

Ed

-- 
"Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue,
and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition." -- Thomas Jefferson

Linux User#: 416016
Linux Machine#: 323569

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060717 Debian/1.
 * Origin: Veritas Vos Leberabit! (1:123/789.0)