Text 40, 124 rader
Skriven 2005-02-13 10:14:24 av ceri@twmba.net
     Kommentar till en text av Heavy Metal
Ärende: Article: Creationists assault freedom of others
=======================================================
From: Ceri <ceri@twmba.net>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MM All,

Now for a change of topic... Another care of WitchVox. VERY interesting
ideas...

Rai

http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/opinion/60882.php

Section: Opinion

Andrew M. Greeley: Creationists assault freedom of others

Slightly more than half the American people reject evolution. During the last
decade, the General Social Survey conducted by National Opinion Research Center
(and directed by my colleague Dr. Tom M. Smith) has asked whether a respondent
thinks humans are descended from animals.

Fifty-two percent said either this was definitely not true or probably not
true. Ever since they won the battle but lost the war in the Scopes trial of
1925, conservative Christians have waged intensive war against evolution.

Despite repeated court decisions insisting evolution must be taught in high
school classes, conservative Christians have managed to keep one form or
another of "creationism" alive and well as an alternative in the minds of many
Americans

This includes 62 percent of black Christians, 52 percent of mainline
Protestants, 42 percent of Catholics and 26 percent of Jews. (Seventy eight
percent of conservative Christians reject evolution).

Evolution, they insist, is only a theory and one that has a lot of holes in it.
Moreover, it is godless, indeed it is part of an assault by a liberal elite on
the beliefs of a God-fearing people.

Their assaults are especially effective in smaller towns and rural areas where
teachers and school administrators are subject to strong pressure from these
God-fearing people.

For their own protection, many teachers, according to a recent article in The
New York Times, skip over the chapters on evolution in the biology textbook.

Indeed in Cobb County, Ga., they forced the schools to put a sticker on the
cover of a text book asserting that "intelligent design" was an equally valid
theory.

"Theory" is not a good word because it implies doubt. The Copernican theory
about the motion of planets around the sun and the big bang theory of the
origin of the universe are models that in their broad outline are simply true.

However much remains to be explained within the model, they fit the known data
so well that they are not in danger of rejection - especially when there is no
alternative theory that even begins to fit the data.

So, too, is evolution a model that fits the data, even if there is still much
exploration to be done within the model. It does not follow that there is any
other model available that fits the data.

"Intelligent design" as an alternative to evolution implies that if one
believes in God, the evolutionary "theory" is unacceptable no matter how
powerful is its explanatory power.

In fact, belief in "intelligent design" is completely compatible with
scientific acceptance of evolution. The design is inside the model, not
something intruded from the outside.

It is not up to science to validate such design. It merely reports what it sees
and leaves to the religion and the religious believer to judge whether it was a
wise God who launched the process, just as she launched the "big bang" with the
polymers and parameters for human life on this planet built in.

Science can't say whether God did that or not - and moreover shouldn't.

Bible Christians cannot accept such a perspective, because they must
necessarily believe the Book of Genesis, word for word inspired by God, is an
accurate and literal book of science.

It is clear to the rest of us that Genesis teaches that God created and
established order in the cosmos, religious truths indeed that go beyond the
realm of science but not against it.

The evangelicals are entitled to their beliefs, but they have no right to try
to impose their view of creation on the rest of us and to deprive the children
of other people an accurate picture of how science models the emergence and
development of life - or an alternative view of the literary nature of the book
of Genesis.

One can understand their effort to fight scientific modernism. If literal
interpretation of Genesis is taken away from them, then their entire religious
edifice is shaken to its foundations.

But when in their battle against modernism they deprive the children of the
rest of us of a proper education, they violate our freedom of religion.


Andrew M. Greeley is a Roman Catholic priest, author and sociologist. He
teaches at the University of Chicago and the University of Arizona; e-mail:
agreel@aol.com <mailto:agreel@aol.com>. 



**All content copyright (C) 1999-2005 AzStarNet, Arizona Daily Star and its
wire services and suppliers and may not be republished without permission. All
rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the
contents of this service without the expressed written consent of Arizona Daily
Star or AzStarNet is prohibited. **













---
 * Origin: TransNet Gateway 2.11+ 1111 (3:640/1010)