Text 2447, 251 rader
Skriven 2005-02-09 18:42:10 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 2430 av Geo (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: MS and Macrovision join forces
==========================================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0BC7_01C50ED7.10D3A330
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Obviously you are not reading before putting your foot in your mouth. =
I provided a link to the Macrovision press release at =
http://www.macrovision.com/company/news/press/newsdetail.jsp?id=3DTue%20F=
eb%2001%2008:22:03%20PST%202005. You look to be quoting the bozos at =
theregister. See the difference. Macrovision press release =3D=3D = credible
source of information on Macrovision's announcement. the = register =3D=3D
non-credible source of information on most topics.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message news:420ab27f@w3.nls.net...
the quote was from your link. Didn't you even read the story you =
posted a link to?
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42078e4e@w3.nls.net...
I quoted the press release and identified it providing a link. =
You quote someone else's opinion and do not identify it. The paranoia I =
still attribute to you. It's from a pattern of behavior. That you = quoted
this and represented it as your opinion or reflective of your = opinion fits
within that pattern.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:42074f7c$1@w3.nls.net...
that was a quote from the article, only the last sentence was =
mine. Sorry I should have made that clearer but you are now saying the = author
of the article is paranoid with feelings of entitlement?
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:4206e8d7@w3.nls.net...
DRM as you are using it is misnomer. Macrovison protection =
is DRM by the definition you are using.
I see you completely ignored the major feature mentioned =
first in the paragraph I quoted and selectively edited your quote to = remove
the suggestion that this other feature is a secondary one. You = also switched
the subject from video, the subject of both features in = the press release, to
audio for some reason. Your paranoia is getting = the best of you. You even
ignore your own point that you can record the = audio output if you wish. I
can't even guess what it is you are trying = to get people to believe but I'm
pretty sure that it bears little = relation to anything Macrovision's product
does or the benefits of = finally allowing the PC to participate with content
that today it is = precluded from supporting.
It should come as no surprise to you that your posts here are =
similar to your's on other discussions of what entitlements you should = have
to the work of others. Your paranoia has gotten so great that you = see people
out to get you and deny you something to which you feel = entitled in every
corner. You don't even question your feeling of = entitlement any more.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:4206ba46$1@w3.nls.net...
As DRM increasingly restricts what users can do with digital =
data, the
analog domain remains one way around the problem. In the case =
of audio, for
instance, digital data ultimate has to be converted into an =
audio sound wave
which can be recorded and re-encoded without the limitations =
of the DRM'd
original. MS is aware of this and is clearly hoping to use =
Macrovision
technology to help block that avenue too.
"An Internet-delivered movie, downloaded to a PC, can now be =
protected on
analog video playback out of a PC," the two companies claimed.
I don't know Rich, that seems pretty clear to me.
Geo.
=3D
------=_NextPart_000_0BC7_01C50ED7.10D3A330
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.1289" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Obviously you are not =
reading before=20
putting your foot in your mouth. I provided a link to the =
Macrovision=20
press release at <A=20
href=3D"http://www.macrovision.com/company/news/press/newsdetail.jsp?id=3D=
Tue%20Feb%2001%2008:22:03%20PST%202005">http://www.macrovision.com/compan=
y/news/press/newsdetail.jsp?id=3DTue%20Feb%2001%2008:22:03%20PST%202005</=
A>. =20
You look to be quoting the bozos at theregister. See the =
difference. =20
Macrovision press release =3D=3D credible source of information on =
Macrovision's=20
announcement. the register =3D=3D non-credible source of = information on
most=20
topics.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:420ab27f@w3.nls.net">news:420ab27f@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the quote was from your link. Didn't =
you even=20
read the story you posted a link to?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42078e4e@w3.nls.net">news:42078e4e@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I quoted the press =
release and=20
identified it providing a link. You quote someone else's =
opinion and=20
do not identify it. The paranoia I still attribute to =
you. It's=20
from a pattern of behavior. That you quoted this and =
represented it as=20
your opinion or reflective of your opinion fits within that=20
pattern.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42074f7c$1@w3.nls.net">news:42074f7c$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that was a quote from the =
article, only the=20
last sentence was mine. Sorry I should have made that clearer but =
you are=20
now saying the author of the article is paranoid with feelings of=20
entitlement?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4206e8d7@w3.nls.net">news:4206e8d7@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> DRM as you are =
using it=20
is misnomer. Macrovison protection is DRM by the =
definition=20
you are using.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I see you =
completely ignored=20
the major feature mentioned first in the paragraph I quoted and=20
selectively edited your quote to remove the suggestion that this =
other=20
feature is a secondary one. You also switched the subject =
from=20
video, the subject of both features in the press release, to =
audio for=20
some reason. Your paranoia is getting the best of =
you. You=20
even ignore your own point that you can record the audio output =
if you=20
wish. I can't even guess what it is you are trying to get =
people=20
to believe but I'm pretty sure that it bears little relation to =
anything=20
Macrovision's product does or the benefits of finally allowing =
the PC to=20
participate with content that today it is precluded from=20
supporting.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> It should come as =
no surprise=20
to you that your posts here are similar to your's on other =
discussions=20
of what entitlements you should have to the work of =
others. =20
Your paranoia has gotten so great that you see people out to get =
you and=20
deny you something to which you feel entitled in every =
corner. You=20
don't even question your feeling of entitlement any=20
more.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:4206ba46$1@w3.nls.net">news:4206ba46$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>As=20
DRM increasingly restricts what users can do with digital =
data,=20
the<BR>analog domain remains one way around the problem. In =
the case=20
of audio, for<BR>instance, digital data ultimate has to be =
converted=20
into an audio sound wave<BR>which can be recorded and =
re-encoded=20
without the limitations of the DRM'd<BR>original. MS is aware =
of this=20
and is clearly hoping to use Macrovision<BR>technology to help =
block=20
that avenue too.<BR>"An Internet-delivered movie, downloaded =
to a PC,=20
can now be protected on<BR>analog video playback out of a PC," =
the two=20
companies claimed.<BR><BR>I don't know Rich, that seems pretty =
clear=20
to me.<BR><BR>Geo.<BR><FONT face=3DArial=20
=
size=3D2>=3D</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></=
BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0BC7_01C50ED7.10D3A330--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|