Text 4625, 323 rader
Skriven 2005-06-05 17:51:46 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 4624 av Rich Gauszka (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Apple dumps IBM!
============================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C569F7.3E7E7280
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No. If what the article suggests is a quote or accurate paraphrase =
what they are saying is that all the many forms of DRM they support are = all
announced and take the opportunity to list several of them. Intel = is a major
proponent (see =
http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/dighome/contentpro.htm) and = one of
the technology licensors. They are one of the Cs in both 4C and = 5C and
probably others.
Rich
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message =
news:42a399da@w3.nls.net...
So it looks like Intel is saying they support copy protection in =
everything=20
but the Pentium D? <g>
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D23708
Many Intel products today support several existing copy protection or=20
content protection technologies. These include support today for =
things like=20
Macrovision and DTCP-IP, and in the second half of 2005, Intel will =
deliver=20
an updated graphics driver that will also support additional content=20
protection technologies including COPP, HDCP, CGMS-A, and others. =
DTCP-IP=20
technology, which is publicly offered by a number of companies in the=20
industry, enables protected transport of compressed content within a =
home=20
network. While Intel continues to work with the industry to support =
other=20
content protection technologies, we have not added any unannounced DRM =
technologies in either the Pentium D processor or the Intel 945 =
Express=20
Chipset family.
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message=20
news:vf47a1des0vrihsbqjs9btl5cv6hvtnhme@4ax.com...
>
> Meanwhile, it appears that Intel is backing away from something, is =
it
> DRM?
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D23708
>
> /m
>
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:36:26 -0400, "Rich Gauszka" =
<gauszka@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gregg N" <gregg@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:Xns966BC68E93E8Dgregginvalidinvalid@216.144.1.254...
>>> >
>>> It didn't say anything about being ordinary clones, merely that =
they=20
>>> will
>>> be using Intel chips. Assuming they mean x86 chips, that still =
doesn't
>>> mean they will be adopting the entire PC architecture. They could
>>> continue to control the architecture and the software in their =
usual
>>> vertical manner. That might mean their own unique BIOS among other
>>> things.
>>>
>>> Gregg
>>
>>Wired is claiming that Job's found a fast, transparent, universal=20
>>emulator
>>from Transative and he also wants the hardware copyproctection of =
the new
>>Pentium D chips ( the Apple movie store? )
>>
>>http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,67749,00.html?tw=3Dwn_tophead_1
>>
>>As initially reported, there are a couple of big problems with Apple =
>>moving
>>to Intel. The biggest is shifting all the Mac software to a new =
platform.
>>Apple apparently mulled moving to Intel a few years ago, when =
Motorola's
>>chip development fell woefully behind, but Steve Jobs nixed it =
because of
>>the massive disruption it would cause developers.
>>
>>What's new this time is a fast, transparent, universal emulator from
>>Transitive, a Silicon Valley startup.
>>
>>Transitive's QuickTransit allows any software to run on any hardware =
with=20
>>no
>>performance hit, or so the company claims. The techology =
automatically=20
>>kicks
>>in when necessary, and supports high-end 3D graphics. It was =
developed by
>>Alasdair Rawsthorne.
>>
>>When I wrote about the software for Wired News last fall, the =
company had
>>PowerBooks and Windows laptops running Linux software, including =
Quake=20
>>III,
>>with no performance lag whatsoever.
>>
>>If Apple has licensed QuickTransit for an Intel-powered Mac, all =
current
>>applications should just work, no user or developer intervention =
required.
>>
>>Programmers could port their software to the new platform slowly and
>>steadily, and the shift would be as relatively painless as the =
recent move
>>from OS 9 to OS X, which, of course, relied on emulation in the =
Classic
>>environment.
>>
>>But why would Apple do this? Because Apple wants Intel's new Pentium =
D
>>chips.
>>
>>Released just few days ago, the dual-core chips include a hardware =
copy
>>protection scheme that prevents "unauthorized copying and =
distribution of
>>copyrighted materials from the motherboard," according to PC World.
>>
>>Apple -- or rather, Hollywood -- wants the Pentium D to secure an =
online
>>movie store (iFlicks if you will), that will allow consumers to buy =
or=20
>>rent
>>new movies on demand, over the internet.
>>
>=20
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C569F7.3E7E7280
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> No. If what the =
article suggests=20
is a quote or accurate paraphrase what they are saying is that all the =
many=20
forms of DRM they support are all announced and take the opportunity to =
list=20
several of them. Intel is a major proponent (see <A=20
href=3D"http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/dighome/contentpro.htm"=
>http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/dighome/contentpro.htm</A>)=20
and one of the technology licensors. They are one of the Cs in = both 4C
and=20
5C and probably others.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich Gauszka" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:gauszka@hotmail.com">gauszka@hotmail.com</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A =
href=3D"news:42a399da@w3.nls.net">news:42a399da@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>So=
it=20
looks like Intel is saying they support copy protection in everything =
<BR>but=20
the Pentium D? <g><BR><BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D23708">http://www.theinquir=
er.net/?article=3D23708</A><BR><BR>Many=20
Intel products today support several existing copy protection or =
<BR>content=20
protection technologies. These include support today for things like=20
<BR>Macrovision and DTCP-IP, and in the second half of 2005, Intel =
will=20
deliver <BR>an updated graphics driver that will also support =
additional=20
content <BR>protection technologies including COPP, HDCP, CGMS-A, and =
others.=20
DTCP-IP <BR>technology, which is publicly offered by a number of =
companies in=20
the <BR>industry, enables protected transport of compressed content =
within a=20
home <BR>network. While Intel continues to work with the industry to =
support=20
other <BR>content protection technologies, we have not added any =
unannounced=20
DRM <BR>technologies in either the Pentium D processor or the Intel =
945=20
Express <BR>Chipset family.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>"Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:vf47a1des0vrihsbqjs9btl5cv6hvtnhme@4ax.com">news:vf47a1des0v=
rihsbqjs9btl5cv6hvtnhme@4ax.com</A>...<BR>><BR>>=20
Meanwhile, it appears that Intel is backing away from something, is =
it<BR>>=20
DRM?<BR>><BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D23708">http://www.theinquir=
er.net/?article=3D23708</A><BR>><BR>>=20
/m<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:36:26 -0400, =
"Rich=20
Gauszka" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:gauszka@hotmail.com">gauszka@hotmail.com</A>><BR>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>>><BR>>>"Gregg N" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:gregg@invalid.invalid">gregg@invalid.invalid</A>> =
wrote in=20
=
message<BR>>>news:Xns966BC68E93E8Dgregginvalidinvalid@216.144.1.254=
...<BR>>>>=20
><BR>>>> It didn't say anything about being ordinary =
clones,=20
merely that they <BR>>>> will<BR>>>> be using Intel =
chips.=20
Assuming they mean x86 chips, that still doesn't<BR>>>> mean =
they=20
will be adopting the entire PC architecture. They =
could<BR>>>>=20
continue to control the architecture and the software in their=20
usual<BR>>>> vertical manner. That might mean their own =
unique BIOS=20
among other<BR>>>> things.<BR>>>><BR>>>>=20
Gregg<BR>>><BR>>>Wired is claiming that Job's found =
a fast,=20
transparent, universal <BR>>>emulator<BR>>>from Transative =
and he=20
also wants the hardware copyproctection of the new<BR>>>Pentium =
D chips=20
( the Apple movie store?=20
=
)<BR>>><BR>>>http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,67749,00.ht=
ml?tw=3Dwn_tophead_1<BR>>><BR>>>As=20
initially reported, there are a couple of big problems with Apple=20
<BR>>>moving<BR>>>to Intel. The biggest is shifting all =
the Mac=20
software to a new platform.<BR>>>Apple apparently mulled moving =
to Intel=20
a few years ago, when Motorola's<BR>>>chip development fell =
woefully=20
behind, but Steve Jobs nixed it because of<BR>>>the massive =
disruption=20
it would cause developers.<BR>>><BR>>>What's new this time =
is a=20
fast, transparent, universal emulator from<BR>>>Transitive, a =
Silicon=20
Valley startup.<BR>>><BR>>>Transitive's QuickTransit =
allows any=20
software to run on any hardware with =
<BR>>>no<BR>>>performance=20
hit, or so the company claims. The techology automatically=20
<BR>>>kicks<BR>>>in when necessary, and supports high-end =
3D=20
graphics. It was developed by<BR>>>Alasdair=20
Rawsthorne.<BR>>><BR>>>When I wrote about the software for =
Wired=20
News last fall, the company had<BR>>>PowerBooks and Windows =
laptops=20
running Linux software, including Quake =
<BR>>>III,<BR>>>with no=20
performance lag whatsoever.<BR>>><BR>>>If Apple has =
licensed=20
QuickTransit for an Intel-powered Mac, all =
current<BR>>>applications=20
should just work, no user or developer intervention=20
required.<BR>>><BR>>>Programmers could port their software =
to the=20
new platform slowly and<BR>>>steadily, and the shift would be as =
relatively painless as the recent move<BR>>>from OS 9 to OS X, =
which, of=20
course, relied on emulation in the=20
Classic<BR>>>environment.<BR>>><BR>>>But why would =
Apple do=20
this? Because Apple wants Intel's new Pentium=20
D<BR>>>chips.<BR>>><BR>>>Released just few days ago, =
the=20
dual-core chips include a hardware copy<BR>>>protection scheme =
that=20
prevents "unauthorized copying and distribution =
of<BR>>>copyrighted=20
materials from the motherboard," according to PC=20
World.<BR>>><BR>>>Apple -- or rather, Hollywood -- wants =
the=20
Pentium D to secure an online<BR>>>movie store (iFlicks if you =
will),=20
that will allow consumers to buy or <BR>>>rent<BR>>>new =
movies on=20
demand, over the internet.<BR>>><BR>>=20
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C569F7.3E7E7280--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|