Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1117
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   2847
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13077
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4277
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   28807
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2031
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6000
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33809
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   23559
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12847
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4208
FN_SYSOP   41525
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13587
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16054
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22013
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   902
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
Möte POLITICS, 29554 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 12645, 114 rader
Skriven 2005-05-16 05:05:00 av Jeff Binkley (1:226/600)
Ärende: Koran
=============
http://reuters.myway.com/article/20050516/2005-05-
16T002959Z_01_N15405868_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-RELIGION-AFGHAN-NEWSWEEK-DC.html

Newsweek says Koran desecration report is wrong
 
 
 Email this Story

May 15, 8:29 PM (ET)

 
By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Newsweek magazine said on Sunday it erred in a 
May 9 report that U.S. interrogators desecrated the Koran at Guantanamo 
Bay, and apologized to the victims of deadly Muslim protests sparked by 
the article.

Editor Mark Whitaker said the magazine inaccurately reported that U.S. 
military investigators had confirmed that personnel at the detention 
facility in Cuba had flushed the Muslim holy book down the toilet.

The report sparked angry and violent protests across the Muslim world 
from Afghanistan, where 16 were killed and more than 100 injured, to 
Pakistan to Indonesia to Gaza. In the past week it was condemned in 
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and by the Arab League.

On Sunday, Afghan Muslim clerics threatened to call for a holy war 
against the United States.

"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our 
sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in 
its midst," Whitaker wrote in the magazine's latest issue, due to appear 
on U.S. newsstands on Monday.

The weekly news magazine said in its May 23 edition that the information 
had come from a "knowledgeable government source" who told Newsweek that 
a military report on abuse at Guantanamo Bay said interrogators flushed 
at least one copy of the Koran down a toilet in a bid to make detainees 
talk.

But Newsweek said the source later told the magazine he could not be 
certain he had seen an account of the Koran incident in the military 
report and that it might have been in other investigative documents or 
drafts.

Whitaker told Reuters that Newsweek did not know if the reported toilet 
incident involving the Koran ever occurred. "As to whether anything like 
this happened, we just don't know," he said in an interview. "We're not 
saying it absolutely happened but we can't say that it absolutely didn't 
happen either." 

INCIDENT UNDER INVESTIGATION

The acknowledgment by the magazine came amid heightened scrutiny of the 
U.S. media, which has seen a rash of news organizations fire reporters 
and admit that stories were fabricated or plagiarized.

The Pentagon told the magazine the report was wrong last Friday, saying 
it had investigated earlier allegations of Koran desecration from 
detainees and found them "not credible."

Newsweek reported that Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita reacted 
angrily when the magazine asked about the source's continued assertion 
that he had read about the Koran incident in an investigative report. 
"People are dead because of what this son of a bitch said. How could he 
be credible now?" DiRita told Newsweek.

The May 9 report, which appeared as a brief item by Michael Isikoff and 
John Barry in the magazine's "Periscope" section, had a huge 
international impact, sparking the protests from Muslims who consider 
the Koran the literal word of God and treat each book with deep 
reverence.

Desecration of the Koran is punishable by death in Afghanistan and 
Pakistan.

Newsweek, which said opponents of the Afghan government including 
remnants of the Taliban had used its report to fan unrest in the 
country, said it was not contemplating disciplinary action against 
staff.

"This was reported very carefully, with great sensitivity and concern, 
and we'll continue to report on it," said Newsweek Managing Editor Jon 
Meacham. "We have tried to be transparent about exactly what happened, 
and we leave it to the readers to judge us."

U.S. officials opened an investigation but maintained that members of 
the Guantanamo security force were sensitive to the religious beliefs 
and practices of the detainees in U.S. custody.

U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley earlier on Sunday stressed 
the report had not been confirmed. "If it turns out to be true, 
obviously we will take action against those responsible," Hadley said on 
CNN's "Late Edition."

Newsweek's Whitaker said that when the magazine first heard of the Koran 
allegation from its source, staff approached two Defense Department 
officials. One declined to comment, while the other challenged a 
different aspect of the May 9 story but did not dispute the Koran 
charge.

The magazine said other news organizations had already aired charges of 
Koran desecration based "only on the testimony of detainees."

"We believed our story was newsworthy because a U.S. official said 
government investigators turned up this evidence. So we published the 
item," Whitaker said.

"Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of 
the alleged Koran incident in the report we cited," he wrote. 

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
 * Origin:  (1:226/600)