Text 13914, 85 rader
Skriven 2005-07-05 18:30:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ALAN HESS
Ärende: Dean on Drugs?
======================
On 07-03-05, ALAN HESS said to ED HULETT:


EH> I find it rather ironic how they are so quick to claim that
EH> anyone who disagrees with them as hating America. They fail to


AH>It appears to me that anyone who disagrees with Bush's policies is labeled
AH>as hating America, and it's not the liberals calling them that.


AH>So, it seems that the label of "America hater," like the label of "Nazi,"
AH>is just a convenient name for anyone on any part of the political spectrum
AH>to call people who disagree with the policies that person supports.  *adh*


Well, you could equate it to the way the liberal democrat side of Fido
continually condemned the conservative and independent side of Fido, just
because they expressed outrage over Clinton claiming `not' to have had sex
with that woman....Ms. Lewinski, on national TV, when he had, in fact, `had
sex with that woman......Ms. Lewinski.


Or the way the liberal democrat side of Fido visciously attacked the
conservative and independent side of Fido when outrage was expressed over the
billing records of the Rose Law Firm dealing with Whitewater, which had been
under subpoena over two years, suddenly turn up in the `book room' in the
residence portion of the White House!


Or the way the liberal democrat side of Fido saw nothing wrong with a sitting
president dekiberately lying to a federal grand jury, a federal judge, in a
legal deposition, and dared to qwibble over the meaning of the word "is", when
pinned down for a definite answer to a straight forward question.


Or the way liberal democrats saw nothing wrong with individuals closely
connected with the Clintons (who were in the White House at the time), going
in front of a Senate committee, and daring to use terms like `vacuumed' in
relation to documents that committee had subpoenaed, as well as in regard to
the White House office of an administration official who had died under (what
can only be described as) suspicious circumstances.


Or the way liberal democrats saw nothing wrong with a two-bit lawyer staving
off an official police investigation of that death, denying access to the
victims office to investigative authorities for a couple of days, while
various individuals `wandered' in and out of that office at will, such that
when the police authority finally *did* gain access, whatever evidence there
might have been present had been tampered with, removed, or completely lost
due to carelessness or clumsiness on the part of the veritable `parade' of
people through the office over e period of days!


How the fuck can any of you liberal democrats sit there without so much as a
blink of an eye, over the fact that that same ambulance chaser made the police
investigaters sit across a desk from the brief case, while this ambulance
chaser removed one item at a time, *pronounced* what it was, and placed it out
of reach of the investigators, never allowing them to examine anything for
themselves?


What kind of a fuckin' trick do you call that! If that fuckin' cheap ambulance
chaser had gotten `cuffed' and frog marched out of the White House, hustled
into a prowl car and whisked to headquarters for obstructing the investigation
of a homicide, I'd have had no problem with that.


If that were an ordinary citizen, how long would you guess the investigators
would have sat away from the brief case while that citizen took one item at a
time out, `declared' what it was, and then put it out of reach? In real life,
it can't happen.


You suckers got no room to be bitching and griping at us, pal. The present
administration has miles and miles to go before even approaching the
boundaries the Clintons set in their eight years as the nations' disgrace!





---
*Durango b301 #PE* Hac lege - with this law
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)