Text 13945, 67 rader
Skriven 2005-07-07 02:56:00 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
     Kommentar till en text av Alan Hess
Ärende: Dean on Drugs?
======================
06 Jul 05 15:27, Alan Hess wrote to John Hull:

 AH> Whilst masticating on <Jul 05 05>, John Hull (1:379/1.99)
 AH> wrote to Alan Hess:

 AH>>> So, it seems that the label of "America hater," like the label 
 AH>>> of "Nazi," is just a convenient name for anyone on any part of 
 AH>>> the political spectrum to call people who disagree with the 
 AH>>> policies that person supports.  *adh*

 JH>> Good god, boy, you can't even call it right when you try to pin 
 JH>> namecalling on somebody!  There is a single message posted by 
 JH>> Sakowski in here that doesn't end with "Why do Republicans hate 
 JH>> America" or something similar.

 AH> And he's wrong to claim they hate America.  They believe they have 
 AH> America's best interest at heart, just as the Democrats do.  It's 
 AH> politics as it always has been to express disagreement, often 
 AH> vehemntly, but there should be limits (not limits mandated by law, 
 AH> but by courtesy toward fellow Americans who are fellow Americans 
 AH> even if you disagree with their politics.)

That's horse hockey, Alan.  We aren't talking about basic philosophical
differences between the parties here.  Its the basic approach, but first and
foremost its the motivation of those on the left.

Liberals aren't interested in "doing what's right for the country" just because
its the right thing to do.  They approach it from the standpoint that whatever
is right for the liberals, is right for the country.  Their motivation is their
own advancement and poltical gain first, and everything else second.

 JH>> Apparently its okay to be a liberal, and everything a liberal 
 JH>> does or advocates is seen as mainstream, middle of the road, good 
 JH>> for America keeno neat.  But if you're a Republican/conservative, 
 JH>> you're a radical extremist, a right-wing whacko, a Nazi, an 
 JH>> America Hater, ad infinitum.  

 AH> I've already been called things like terrorist supporter.  
 AH> Politicians from both sides of the spectrum have invoked the Nazis 
 AH> (though more Democrat politicians have done so, far as I can tell. 
 AH>  Doing so is wrong, IMO, by Dems or Reps.)

Reread those two paragraphs just up above there.  Our motivation for going to
war is that its the right thing to do, regardless of how inconvenient and
painful it might be.  Liberal just want to appease the terrorist like they've
done for the last 30 years.  

 JH>> Every time Ted Kennedy, Diane Feinstein, Charles Schumer, 
 JH>> Hillary, John Conyers, etc., etc., open their mouths that's all 
 JH>> you hear!  We see it everyday on the TV new shows, hear it on 
 JH>> radio, read it here in this echo.

 AH> And their Republican counterparts say different things about their 
 AH> opposition?  They say good things about Democrats and/or liberals? 
 AH>  I haven't noticed that.  *adh*

You guys never do.  The fundamental tone is like night and day, but you guys
never seem to notice because you've always got shades on trying to make people
think you're cool.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
LIBERALS AND DOGS KEEP OFF THE GRASS!

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)