Text 1408, 115 rader
Skriven 2004-08-24 17:22:08 av BOB SAKOWSKI (1:123/140)
Ärende: Liar's Poker
====================
Comments on the veracity of Mr. Bush?

From Capitol Hill Blue

The Rant
Liar's Poker
By
Aug 24, 2004, 15:09

(EDITOR'S NOTE: Yeah, we know, Thompson said he and The Rant were finished.
Kaput. Gone with the wind and all that. But he's said that before and we
knew he'd be back. The only thing that will stop him is a wooden stake
through the heart and we can't do it. He's the boss.)

Yep, the nation’s newspapers, the airwaves and even cyberspace are filled
with talk about a Presidential candidate whom some say lied about his
military experiences.

But which one?

Back in 1978, a candidate for Congress in West Texas distributed campaign
literature said he “served in the Air Forceö where he piloted the “F-102
aircraft.ö

The candidate placed an ad with the claim in the Lubbock Avalanche Journal.
No one questioned his claim at the time but he lost the race and faded into
relative obscurity.

Until more than two decades later when the former unsuccessful candidate
for Congress managed to get himself elected governor of Texas and announced
he planned to run for President of the United States.

An Associated Press reporter in Texas researched news clippings about the
past activities of George W. Bush and came across the campaign ad. So the
reporter asked Bush to explain.

“I think so, yes. I was in the Air Force for over 600 days,ö Bush told the
AP reporter. Confused because Bush’s statement did not jive with his Texas
Air National Guard service, the reporter went to the governor’s chief
political flak, Karen Hughes, who backed her boss’s revision of history:

“As an officer in the Air National Guard he was serving on active duty in
the Air Force,ö Hughes told the Associated Press.

Still confused, the reporter sought clarification from the Air Force which
said Bush and Hughes apparently didn't know the difference between Guard
Service and active duty.

“Air National Guard members are considered 'guardsmen on active duty' while
receiving pilot training. They are not, however, counted as members of the
overall active-duty Air Force,ö the public information office of the Air
Force told the AP.

Furthermore, the AP reported, “Anyone in the Air National Guard is always
considered a guardsmen and not a member of the active-duty Air Force,
according to an Air Force spokeswoman in the Pentagon. A National Guard
member may be called to active duty for pilot training or another temporary
assignment and receive active-duty pay at the time, but they remain Guard
members.ö

Was the AP reporter confused? Not likely, says Capt. Cristin Lesperance of
the Air Force Media Relations Office.

“If a member of the Air National Guard is in pilot training, they would
remain on the Guard books. They would be counted as Guard, not as an
active-duty Air Force member.ö

That’s not the only lie Bush and Hughes told about the President’s
so-called military service.

Bush said he flew planes for “600 days.ö Hughes said he served 607 days in
training and on alerts.

Yet to tally up 600 days of flying time during his 1968-73 tour with the
Air Guard, Bush would have had to been flying every weekend of his guard
duty plus the two weeks each summer and then some. But Bush failed to
appear for a flight physical in the Spring of 1972 and lost his flight
status.  Even if he had flown every weekend since flight school in 1968,
plus every waking hour of his summer service, he could not have logged
anywhere near 600 days of flight time.

And records of the Texas Air National Guard wing where Bush was stationed
show the unit was only on alert status for a total of 29 days during that
period.

So, yes, there are lies being told about military service in this campaign.

Some by the so-called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (an oxymoron is there
ever was one).

Some by Senator Kerry.

And some by the President of the United States.

If honesty must be a qualification to lead this country (and it certainly
should be), then the only logical choice is “None of the above.ö

© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue

Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political,
human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes. For more
information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you
wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)