Text 23397, 39 rader
Skriven 2006-10-03 10:27:30 av John Hull (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 23367 av Bob Sakowski (1:275/311)
Ärende: Predatorgate
====================
Bob Sakowski -> MIMI GALLANDT wrote:
 BS> MIMI GALLANDT wrote:

 BS>>> We are not talking about murder, Mimi.  We are
 BS>>> talking about a 50+ year old man preying on
 BS>>> teen age boys that were sent to Washington to
 BS>>> learn, up close and personal, how the
 BS>>> legislative branch of our government works.

 >> and this is different from one certain intern in the
 >> White House who was only 5 years older, how?

 BS> If you have to ask what the difference is between a 50+ year old
 BS> man preying on 16 year old boys left in his care and a 50+ year
 BS> old man getting a hummer from a 21 year old woman then no amount
 BS> of explaining will do it for your moral compass is too far out of
 BS> whack.

 BS> What happened to you Mimi?  I can understand changing political
 BS> viewpoints but seeking to excuse Foley's sexual predatory
 BS> behavior toward those 16 year old boys is beyond understanding.

 BS> Hell, even the Washington Times... the Washington Times, for God's
 BS> sake! has responded with outrage toward Foley and the rest of the
 BS> House leadership who engaged in the attempted coverup, demanding
 BS> that Hastert resign.

Your outrage is as transparent as glass.  Where was the outrage when Mel
Reynolds got caught boning a 13-year old in his limo?  Or any of the other
Democrats who have had ethical lapses involving minors over the last 10-15
years?  Eh, Bob?

No excuses for Foley, he's a lowlife scumbag pervert, but at least he never
touched the kid.  Can't say that for Reynolds, can we?  And if you think this
wasn't politically motivated to try to damage the GOP leadership right before a
crucial election, you're dumber than a hod of bricks.

--- Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)