Text 5339, 197 rader
Skriven 2004-11-25 19:54:00 av ED HULETT (1:275/311)
     Kommentar till en text av BJöRN FORSSTRöM
Ärende: Breaking News!
======================
-=> BJöRN FORSSTRöM wrote to ED HULETT <=-


 BF>  BF>>  EH> Well, you think wrong. Zarqawi and his henchmen are NOT Iraqi!
Zarqawi is
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Jordanian! Many of his men are al Qi'ada members who have been
recruted
 BF>  BF>>  EH> from neiboring countries.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> Then what the 'ech are you doing in Iraq?
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> Duh! We just last year defeated Saddam's military and tossed him out
of
 BF>  EH> power. If you do a google search for "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and
read
 BF>  EH> about it.
 BF> 
 BF> But, if they all are Jordanian, isn't it Jordan you should bomb?

We aren't at war with Jordan. Zarqawi isn't representing Jordan, he is
representing
al-Qi'ada.
 
 BF> And I say like you when you say that all about N379P is propaganda and
lies,

I've read several articles concerning N379P and N8068V and have found them
lacking
evidence of anything untoward. The accounts are full of innuendo and wild
guesses.

 BF> that what I can read on the Internet about what you suggest is American
propaganda.

I didn't suggest "American propraganda." I suggested you find sources other
than
the propaganda you are now exposed to.

 BF> It work both ways you know.

You don't have any idea what my sources are. You are just guessing. I get
information
from all over the world. And no, I don't just accept that which agrees with me.

 BF> If you could agree with some I say it shouldn't be a problem for me to 
 BF> agree with some you say.

It doesn't work that way, Bjorn. I don't have to agree with anything you say
just
to get you to see the light. Your sources appear to be from the extreme
left-wing
anti-war crowd who are willing to say anything to attack America and George
Bush.

 BF>  BF>>  BF>> The war is going on in Iraq, not in USA.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Yes, it is and the majority of Iraqis back the US' efforts
there.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> It doesn't seem that way.
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> I suggest you seek out better news sources then.
 BF> 
 BF> Like your pro American propaganda sites?

You assume too much, Bjorn. You appear to think that anything that disagrees
with
you has to be a "pro American propaganda" source. How open minded of you. 

 BF>  BF>>  EH> Huh???? The people the US is fighting in Iraq at the moment are
NOT
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Iraqis. They are called "insurgents" by the liberal press for a
reason.
 BF>  BF>>  EH> The new Iraqi military is now fighting along side the US in
many places.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> Do they have another choise?
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> Yes.
 BF> 
 BF> And that would be......?

They could choose to fight against the US, but they don't. They know who is
looking
out for the best interests of Iraq. That would be the US.
 
 BF>  BF>>  BF>> Well, you can't ask him now if he was pretending or not and
where in the
 BF>  BF>>  BF>> Military Rule-book does it say: Shoot first and ask questions
later?
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Right next to where it says that if you don't, they (the enemy)
will kill
 BF>  BF>>  EH> you.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> Can you specify that please.
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> How much more specific do you need it?
 BF> 
 BF> The ISBN nr and page please.

You think that such a rule has to be printed in a book? So, you'd allow someone
to kill you without fighting back?
 
 BF>  BF>>  EH> People who have no idea what a war-crime is. All they know is
that they
 BF>  BF>>  EH> are against this war and anything the US does is a war-crime.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> *I* didn't say that.
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> You certainly did in your very first post in this thread.
 BF> 
 BF> I have only been talking about that particularty soldier.

Of whom you know nothing other than a video taken out of context.
 
 BF>  BF>>  BF>> Like when your soldiers hates the Iraquies?
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Our soldiers do not hate Iraqis. Zarqawi and his bunch are NOT
Iraqis.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> Then either them or you have anything to do in Iraq.
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> You really don't follow the news that close, do you?
 BF> 
 BF> I have been following you when you say they are from Jordan so then
 BF> the war should be in Jordan.

You don't understand. Zarqawi is Jordanian, but we don't bomb Jordan because of
one
man. Zarqawi's men are from several other countries, some even from Iraq
(former
Ba'athists and Sunni Muslims) but we don't bomb those other countries. We go
after
Zarqawi and his hemchmen for terrorizing the innocent Iraqis and killing
innocent
aid workers.
 
 BF>  BF>>  BF>> Hadn't it be better to evacuate the building and call for
backup before
 BF>  BF>>  BF>> shooting around?
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>>  EH> Bwaahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
 BF>  BF>>  EH> You don't have a clue, do you?
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> It seem as we are two about that then, eh?
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> No, you appear to be the only one without a clue.
 BF> 
 BF> And no one are explaining anything either, just laughing....

It isn't our responsibility to enlighten you. You don't seem willing to believe
anything but your anti-American sources.
 
 BF>  BF>>  EH> The terrorist who was shot was lilkely not an Iraqi. And, yes,
more Iraqis
 BF>  BF>>  EH> speak English than you would imagine.
 BF>  BF>>
 BF>  BF>> The keywords here are "likely not".
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> Yes. Even if he was Iraqi, he was a terrorist who had participated in
 BF>  EH> atrocities against innocent Fahlugans and others.
 BF> 
 BF> So now you agree about that, he might have been a Iraqi and how do you
know
 BF> he was a terrorist when you don't even know from what country he was?

It is obvious he was a terrorist. He was one of Zarqawi's henchmen! I don't
need
to know what country he was from to know that.
 
 BF>   BF>> And you know enough?
 BF> 
 BF>  EH> Yes, I have kept myself quite well informed about what is going on in
 BF>  EH> Iraq.
 BF> 
 BF> And you have listned to whom? Only the American news I guess.

Don't assume to know what and who I listen to. I get my news from many
sources. I do NOT watch or listen to US news sources.

 BF> Do you read anything that the other side write? Didn't think so.

You are making yourself a fool. I read many sources outside the US. And yes,
I read what the other side has to say.

 BF> You know, one should alway read both sides and then make an own opinion
 BF> about it and then the truth is somewhare in between.
 
Then, why do you ignore everything but that which agrees with you?

And, no, the truth is always where the truth is, not "somewhere in between."

Ed

--- blueMail/Win32 0.11
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:275/311)