Text 6320, 72 rader
Skriven 2004-12-16 18:20:27 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
   Kommentar till text 6300 av RICHARD HELM (1:123/140)
Ärende: Breaking News!
======================

 RH> You're accustomed to premissive laws.  We have restrictive laws.  In the
 RH> United States, anything that is not specifically outlawed or regulated is
 RH> permitted.  Your country leans toward giving permission to do common
 RH> things and anything not permitted is outlawed.

I see what you mean but even our law only says what's not permitted not to
do. Then we have to think for ourself what's "legal" to do.

 BF>> See above and what I'm refering to is the opinion of your own "expert".
 BF>> Why can't you prove to me it's according to the rules to take pics. Why
 BF>> should I believe you just because *you* say so?


 RH> See above.  In the United States laws restrict, not permit.  That "export"
 RH> is one of your creation, not mine.

So you are saying I'm hallucinating?

 F>> Like you say to me: Put up or shut up.

 RH> Sorry, you lose.  You make the "positive" statement, you support it with
 RH> evidence.

Thank you, you are so kind and helpful.

 F>> Why don't you prove that then?

 RH> Prove a negative?  Get real.

To find out what's true or not.

 F>>>> Why don't you try to find out if it's against the law to take pics.
 F>>>> instead of trying to fool yourself?

Probaly you have read it by now and obviously it depends on who you are
asking.

 BF>> Who are the best to look it up? You must be better then me to search an
 BF>> American
 BF>> site but perhaps you wouldn't like what you might find, and I only have a
 BF>> dial-up
 BF>> so it isn't that intresting for me.

 RH> You are arguing the point.  It must be of some interest.

Sure, but I was counting in some help to find out what's true or not.

 RH> Then you are lying when you claim to have understood.  You didn't
 RH> understand and are failing to communate what you think you understand.

Now I'm hallucinating again.....?

 RH> Since you have already made up your mind, based on prejudices you have
 RH> against Americans, there is little reason to consider you or your biased
 RH> opinions worthy of comment.

No, iI haven't made up my mind, only trust in what that army-thing said and if
that's not true, then we have a problem, but if exist something else.....

 RH> You're not prepared to support your accusations with verifiable cites, but
 RH> are willing to claim knowledge based on a 5 minute sound bite seen on
 RH> Swedish TV and ignore any words based on over 20 years of personal
 RH> professional experience.

As long as I don't have anything else to go on I think I believe that guy, he
shold
know what he's talking about if it is his job to know such things. Can someone
prove he's wrong, he doesn't know his job.

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)