Text 6344, 87 rader
Skriven 2004-12-17 05:18:00 av FRANK SCHEIDT (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av RICHARD HELM
Ärende: Breaking News!
======================
-=> Quoting Richard Helm to Frank Scheidt <=-
 
 BF>>>> Perhaps no one bothred to deal with it since it was so
 BF>>>> commom and if you listen to your comrades, there are those
 BF>>>> who says I'm right so obviously there are some truth in it.
 
 RH>>> They are NOT my comrades and what the two that "claim" you
 RH>>> are right are dealing with what happened long before the UCMJ
 RH>>> was created.  Any old bastard that continually refers to
 RH>>> enlisted as "swine" isn't much of one to count on for
 RH>>> creditability on military matters.
 
 SH>> Amen.
 
 RH>> There are a couple of old men that served during WWII that lost touch
 RH>> with reality.  
 
 FS> Oh?   hmmmmmm ...

 RH> That's right.  Even YOU admit that YOU don't know the details in the
 RH> changes.  You see, old fart, you are wrong on this one.
 
 RH>> The one that served in the Army did so under the
 RH>> "Articles of War."  The sailor served under the "Articles for the
 RH>> Government of the United States Navy."  Both of those articles fell
 RH> by
 RH>> the wayside in 1950 when the UCMJ was adopted.
 
 FS> It might be of interest to you that the "Articles of War" *did* 
 FS> apply to WWII and that was *before* 1950 ... [sigh] ...

 RH> That's what I said, asshole.  The "Articles of War" were replaced with
 RH> the UCMJ in 1950.  The armed forces of the United States now operate
 RH> under the UCMJ.  Today is AFTER 1950.  

 RH> "BF" has been discussing events that have happened in recent months
 RH> AFTER 1950.  Your knowledge base is of little value in measuring
 RH> TODAY'S activities against pre UCMJ laws since those laws don't apply.
 
 FS> Why is it that you cannot refrain from name-calling?   ... heh 
 FS> heh heh ...
 
 RH>> The powers of a commander has been severely reduced since they
 RH> served.
 RH>> The responsibilities of both officers and enlisted have increased
 RH>> since their time.  The old farts lived in a very different world
 RH> where
 RH>> authority was rarely if ever questioned.  
 FS>  
 FS> "Old farts"?  ... heh heh heh ... 

 RH> That's right. Live with it (as long as you can).
 
 RH>>> You're grasping for straws.  The FACT is that to own a camera
 RH>>> and take pictures with a camera by a military person is NOT
 RH>>> in violation of ANY US law.
 FS>  
 SH>> I think the confusion here is that the Geneva Convention prohibits 
 SH>> captors from parading PWs in front of cameras for propaganda 
 SH>> purposes.  There is no prohibition against soldiers/Marines taking 
 SH>> pictures during wartime. 
 
 RH>> Convince the Swede, he has a 5 minute sound bite education as a
 RH>> knowledge base.
 
 FS> Lessee ... that's probably about 4 minutes, 59 seconds longer 
 FS> than yours ... heh heh heh ...

 RH> Even that short of an exposure would be much longer than your
 RH> exposure. 
 FS> As a matter of curiosity, why have you left the stable?

 RH> Fuck you.

Richard, why not just go back to the stable, and stay with the 
rest of the horses-asses?   ... heh heh heh ... your postings  
are pathetic -- don't you *realize* that?  ... [sigh] ... your 
postings are loaded with profanities ... do you *really* think 
that impresses me ... heh heh heh ... Oh well, wait for my 
whistle, meanwhile stick in sight of the manure piles where 
you'll be comfortable ...

... Even dead fish can swim down stream.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)