Text 8675, 72 rader
Skriven 2005-02-04 23:46:29 av Ed Connell (1:379/1.6)
   Kommentar till text 8613 av Darryl Perry (1:106/324)
Ärende: Re: Unborn
==================
Hey, Darryl.

JH>  DP> The militant right strikes again!  Courthouses are places of
JH>  DP> Justice, and justice is supposed to be blind.  Our country was 
founde
JH>  DP> with the bill of rights which is a proclimation of how justice can 
be
JH> be
JH>  DP> served for our people.  The 10 commandments are not of the 10
JH> ammendments.
JH>  DP> If anything should be place at the courthouse, it's the Bill of 
Right

Did you know that there is nothing in the Bill of Rights or even in the 
Constitution that speaks against stealing and murder?

 DP> it does not offer any guarantees to it either, other than
 DP> the right to practice whichever religion a person chooses.  Up to and
 DP> including no religion at all.


I don't see anything in the constitution that refers to "no religion", but I 
will point out that it is the free practice that is being attacked.  Of 
course, that is what is protected in the first amendment.  I quickly point 
out that free practice does not include forced practice.  We and you are 
against that.

 JH>> DP> Regardless, there is NOTHING in the Constitution and the Bill of
 JH>> DP> rights that guarantees that one religious factor can elevate their 
ag
 JH>> DP> over another.

 JH>> Regardless nothing.  You liberals love to quote that separation of
 JH>> church state garbage, but it had no legal substance then, and it
 JH>> doesn't now, regardless of what the USSC says.  And, I don't see any
 JH>> denomination tryin elevate itself over the rest, unless you are
 JH>> referring to Islam.

 DP> You are going on a tangent again.  It was you who made the comments
 DP> about liberals trying to remove or bar statues of the 10 commandments
 DP> in front of courthouses.  It was you who made the comments about
 DP> liberals halting prayers at school.  My comments were that
 DP> conservatives who claim to follow Jesus's teachings weren't always
 DP> doing so.

All have sinned and come short.

 DP>  My question to you about prayers in schools and statues in front of
 DP> courthouses.... How does advocating those things show that you are
 DP> following Jesus's teachings?  How is objecting to them NOT following
 DP> his teachings?

Having ornements of various kinds is really quite insignificant when it 
comes to whether one is a Christian or not.

 JH>> DP> Christian tho the FF's may have been, the Country they founded was
 JH>> DP> no a country based on religion.

 JH>> You had better go back and read what the Founders had to say, then,
 JH>> becaus that is pure poppycock

 DP> I've read the constitution, and the bill of rights.  I'm still looking
 DP> for any evidence about anything to do about religion, other than the
 DP> 1st ammendment.

Don't skip over that significant part.

I'll just remind you that you made the claim that Jesus was a liberal.  An 
explanation of this would be appreciated. 

--- Fidolook Lite FTN stub 
 * Origin: Procrastinate NOW, don't put it off for tomorro (1:379/1.6)