Text 10646, 202 rader
Skriven 2009-03-24 14:22:48 av Ross Sauer (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 10645 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
Ärende: SHLEMIELS ON THE SAME BUS
=================================
"TIM RICHARDSON -> ROSS SAUER" <1:123/140> wrote in
news:27789$POL_INC@JamNNTPd:

 TR>> The democrat `dirt-digging' squad got busy on Palin almost before
 TR> her TR> acceptance speech was finished. It wasn't more than a day or
 TR> so before TR> stuff started being publically nosed about:


 RS>> People will gossip.


 RS>> You know that as well as I do.


 TR> So.....that excuses it then.....`people will gossip'!

No, it does not.
It doesn't excuse the vcious gossip about Obama either.
But will this be the usual?

Oh that's different!

 RS>> Where was all your outrage when conservative groups were saying
 TR> they had RS>a tape of Michelle Obama making a anti-American speech?


 TR> I wasn't paying attention to Hussein's wife much. But some of the
 TR> things she said in speeches were cause for concern of where exactly
 TR> her loyalties were.

Like what?
Specifically and in context, Tim.

 RS>> (Which never did come out, BTW)


 TR>> The child wasn't hers it was her daughters, and she was just
 TR> covering TR> for her;


 RS>> It was Palin's own actions the day of the delivery that fueled
 TR> those RS>rumors.


 TR> Thats the silliest excuse for slinging dirt at someone I've seen in a
 TR> long time.

Oh?

 TR> On the day of delivery of a grand-daughter, if the grandmother blows
 TR> her nose.. ...does that make her a slob? After all.........its her
 TR> `own actions'.

Tim, Palin took a flight home, AFTER her water broke with this
pregnancy.
A long several-hour flight to Alaska.

 TR>> She'd had an affair with some friend of her husband;


 RS>> And...?


 TR> It turned out to be a bald-faced lie, made up out of rage at Palin
 TR> being the vice-president pick of the republicans.

Do you know this 100% for sure?
Easy answer, no you don't.

And to be totally honest, I don't give a (bleep) if it is true or not.
It's between Palin and her husband.

 RS>> How many wild rumors are you bozos *STILL* flying around about
 TR> Obama? RS>Secret Muslim, not a US citizen, etc.


 TR> First of all, in my years of watching political campaigns and their
 TR> aftermath come and go, one thing I've learned is, when there is
 TR> deliberate effort on the part of an individual to avoid putting
 TR> information out in the public sector to be carefully scrutinized by
 TR> all.......something is seriously amiss.

Fine. Got any credible evidence for the wild rumors?
Didn't think so.

 TR>> Her daughter was pregnant and wasn't married; (which, by the way,
 TR> was TR> true, but none of anyone's business, and certainly not a
 TR> political TR> issue.)


 RS>> Palin *HERSELF* made it an issue, by trotting out her pregnant
 TR> daughter.


 TR> She did no such thing. She did what pretty well every presidential and
 TR> vice- presidential candidate has done for many, many election cycles
 TR> since I was born: introducing their immediately family, and\or having
 TR> the immediate family members present and onstage with them at the
 TR> beginning of a campaign.

She *HERSELF* said her daughter was pregnant.

You can deny it until you are blue in the face, it won't change the
facts.

 TR> I could understand if Palin had maybe individually introduced her
 TR> daughter by; `and this is my daughter, who is
 TR> pregnant-but-unmarried'....or some such. But she didn't.

She did.

 TR> And before you toss in that `well...in her own life'.....etc etc about
 TR> her daughter being pregnant and unmarried. know this:


 TR> Parents raise their children and can only give them moral and social
 TR> guidance as the children grow.

Like Sarah Palin did with her teenage daughter?

 TR> At some point, the child is going to make their own choices in various
 TR> areas, and the parent can only give the best support they can without
 TR> ceasing to love that child.


 TR> When Sarah Palin's daughter was pregnant and un-married, the many
 TR> thousands of young girls in the US who were pregnant and un-married
 TR> for that same year probably numbered in the thousands! Un-wed
 TR> pregnancies have become almost an ingrained situation in American
 TR> society, and for years now we have been hammered by the `socialists'
 TR> with the `its between a woman and her doctor...;!

And Sarah Palin wants only abstinence taught in public schools, like she
taught her daughter.
Sure worked out well for the daughter, right?

BTW, the kid's Daddy has broken off their engagement.
So now the daughter is going to raise the kid as an unwed single Mom.

 TR> The biggest problem the democrat mud-slinging had over it was the girl
 TR> hadn't chosen to have an abortion.

Bullshit.
It was Palin *HYPOCRISY* on this.

 TR>> If one of Hussein Obama's daughters been pregnant and unmarried,
 TR> not TR> one word would have been uttered about it.


 RS>> Bullshit.


 RS>> Were any of Bill Clinton's antics "covered up?"


 TR> `Psssst! (nudge nudge) stage whisper: Bill Clinton ain't the fuckin'
 TR> president anymore....that was two administrations ago! Time to move
 TR> on.

Answer the question.

Then answer this question: Were any of the wild rumors about Obama
covered up?
Easy answer? No.

 RS>> Or was any and every rumor, no matter how wild, run with?
 RS>> Easy answer: The latter.


 RS>> Your "outrage" here is as phony and hypocritical as it can get.


 TR> Your attempt to scare up your usual lynch mob is noted (snicker!) and
 TR> ignored.

Like I said...

 TR>> Palin didn't deserve the filth that came her way for no other
 TR> reason TR> than she was running on the republican ticket.


 RS>> Palin brought it on herself.


 TR> She did no such thing.


 RS>> Now? She's back to "playing the victim," since her lawyers in that
 RS>> "Troopergate" investigation want to get paid.
 RS>> And naturally, Palin is asking for donations from the suckers.


 TR> (Yawn) Sounds like some sort of `politics....Alaska-brand. No concern
 TR> of mine. (Or yours, for that matter.) Whatever the situation there on
 TR> this particular issue, its outcome one way or the other will have no
 TR> effect on me here in sunny, Southern California....or on you, up there
 TR> in Nowheresville, Wisconsin.

There is no town in WI called that.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
 * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)