Text 12577, 46 rader
Skriven 2010-04-03 06:18:08 av Bob Ackley (1:300/3)
  Kommentar till text 12558 av Dave Drum (1:124/311)
Ärende: Constitutionality
=========================
Replying to a message of Dave Drum to Bob Ackley:

 DD> -=> Bob Ackley wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-

 RS>>> From what I've read so far, these are real far-right
 RS>>> nutcases who stumble around in the woods with guns so as
 RS>>> to
 RS>>> be ready to fight against "the AntiChrist's soldiers."

 RS>>> They've been threatening to kill Muslims in those states.

 BA>>> I have to wonder as to the justification of the FBI's
 BA>>> involvement in what is obviously a LOCAL problem.

 DD>> You forget that they were planning to use explosives, and
 DD>> probably machine guns of some sort - which ARE regulated by
 DD>> the Feds.

 DD>> Code of Federal Regulations - Title 27: Alcohol, Tobacco
 DD>> Products and Firearms http://tinyurl.com/TITLE-27a and
 DD>> http://tinyurl.com/TITLE-27b

 BA>> There's no support in the Constitution for the entire Code
 BA>> of Federal Regulations, every single one of them is
 BA>> unConstitutional.

 DD> I believe that the US Supreme Court says differently.

In point of fact federal judges up to and including the Supreme Court,
have been selected for their political ideologies, not for any legal, judicial
or Constitutional expertise, since at least Roosevelt minor's administration.

 DD> Just because something is not specifically permitted by the
 DD> framework document does not automatically mean that it is
 DD> unconstitutional, Bob.

Uh, yes it does.  Those powers not specifically granted to the national
government are reserved to the states or to the people.  Not some powers,
ALL powers.  If the Constitution doesn't say the national government can do
something, it cannot (Constitutionally) assume that it has the power to do so;
the fact that it does exactly that is the fault of the courts and, ultimately,
the
people.

---
 * Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3)