Text 2235, 72 rader
Skriven 2006-08-17 18:20:00 av BOB KLAHN (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOHN MASSEY
Ärende: Opportunity?
====================
 JM>>> I think the real issue is does a person support the US or
 JM>>> the Terrorist. Wayne clearly supports the terrorist.

 BK>>   I think the real issue is, are you allowed to think for
 BK>>   yourself, or must you goose step behind Bush?

 JM> I think, what you think, is irrelevant.

 I think what you think is irrelevant.

 BK>>>>   BTW, it was the Brits who foiled the plot, not the Bush
 BK>>>>   administration.

 JM>>> I know that.
 JM>>> They do not have the same restrictions imposed on them as
 JM>>> the current American administration does.

 BK>>   The current administration seems to have few restrictions at
 BK>>   all.

 JM> No they have that pesky old Constitution in their way.

 Not really, they avoid it at every opportunity.

 BK>>   Oh, and it was police work, not military action.

 JM> O G thanks for the news flash.

 You needed to be reminded. After all, Clinton was criticised for
 treating the first WTC attack as a criminal act instead of an
 act of war. Yet it seems criminal and police investigations have
 done more good than military action.

 ...

 JM>>> Since when is an advisory panel a big deal?

 BK>>   When it is the real policy, and the official policy is just
 BK>>   eyewash.

 JM> That sounds like something paranoid person would say, OR
 JM> maybe a conspiracy theorist certainly not something a
 JM> rational person would believe.

 When your definition of rational requires not believing the
 truth your definition needs redefining.

 JM>>> Administrations have had unofficial advisors since before
 JM>>> the kitchen cabinet

 JM>>> The fact remains,  the official  U.S. national energy
 JM>>> policy is and has been on line. IT IS NOT CLASSIFIED as
 JM>>> some people claim.

 BK>>   Nor is it significant.

 JM> In my mind for someone to claim a falsehood as truth after
 JM> having been shown the facts is a significant marker in that
 JM> persons character.

 Yes, it is. When you show the truth be sure to post your source
 and whatever supporting material you have.

 However, no one is required to accept your word as the final
 truth.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Cry "Santhemum!" and loose the Florists of War!
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)