Text 3008, 94 rader
Skriven 2006-10-27 09:49:07 av Dan Ceppa (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Tim Richardson
Ärende: Foley, et al
====================
-> On 26 Oct 06  04:59:14, Tim Richardson got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: Foley, et al

 TR>> Men in powerful positions promise young females all sorts of
 DC> crap just  TR> to get in their pants, too. Look a Monica Lewinski and
 DC> Clinton. Where  TR> was all this `moral outrage' of yours then?
 
 DC> You probably never asked.

 TR> I shouldn't have `had' to "ask". The point is (as you certainly know),
 TR> you had no `moral outrage' then.....and your trumped-up `moral
 TR> outrage' in Foley's case is rather hollow.

There is a large difference between what Cliton did and what Foley did.  
Or, haven't you noticed that?  


 TR> Clinton was the president of the United States....the Chief Executive
 TR> of America. However hard Lewinski "persued Clinton"...it was Clinton's
 TR> responsibility to do the proper thing and *not* engage in
 TR> reprehensible behavior right in the Oval Office. He failed.

Had Lewinski been under aged or had been promised advancement in 
her career I would agree.  

 
 DC>> Do you have a message from me were I ever defended that other
 DC> congress  DC>critter you mention?
 
 TR>> I don't think I even `knew' you back then. That was back in the
 DC> early  TR> `80's, and I wasn't even playing with computers in those
 DC> days.
 
 DC> Yet, you make the claim that I defended him, didn't you.


 TR> I made no such claim. Reading comprehension is a large problem for
 TR> you, isn't it?
 
Now, it's your problem.  You are the one claiming that I didn't 
express outrage.  

 
 DC> Of course not.  The incident is some 20 years old.  Get over it.

 TR> And so far......Foley may have displayed reprehensible behavior, for
 TR> which he has sacrificed a political career in Congress.....but no
 TR> illegal activity has as yet been brought to light.  Get over it.

Yeah, his $100,000 donation didn't work for him.  

 DC> The hypocrites are the leaders of the republican party.  They
 DC> knew of Foley's indiscretions as much as 5 years ago and did
 DC> nothing about it.  Hell, the assholes allowed him direct contact
 DC> with the page group.


 TR> *You* try again: The democrat pervert went so far as to butt fuck a
 TR> Congressional Page........and bragged about it on-camera!

Yeah, some 20 years ago.  Stop living in the past.  

 TR> So far.....all your lynch mob has been able to come up with on Foley
 TR> is a few disgusting e-mails, and hear-say accusations about Foley maybe
 TR> `cruisin' the Page dorm.

Too bad the 'hearsay' is from the page directly involved in the 
incident.  

 
 DC> All this from the Republicans that claims Family Values and
 DC> a higher morality than the Pope.

 TR> The democrac who butt-fucked a Congressional Page and bragged about it
 TR> on-camera, belongs to the party that tries to claim the moral high
 TR> ground, but continually falls into the gutter on its face.

I didn't know he was a Republican.   

 
 DC> Like the Republican leadership, you are bitching about a
 DC> 20 year old incident that was never discussed by you let
 DC> alone me.

 TR> I wasn't bitching about `anything' until you and your friends started
 TR> spouting off about Foley..as though the fuckin' democrats `never' do
 TR> anything as low as that.

So, in defense, you drag up a case that's 20 years old and try to 
justify Foley's actions.  


--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)