Text 6756, 231 rader
Skriven 2008-05-22 05:12:20 av JOHNJWILSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av TIM RICHARDSON
Ärende: In case you missed it
=============================
-> 
-> 
-> Here it is again, people. Enjoy.
-> 
-> 
-> 
-> IF WE COULD TALK TO THE ANIMALS
-> 
-> 
-> May 21, 2008
-> 
-> 
-> You always know you've struck gold when liberals react with hysteria and
rage
-> to something you've said. So I knew President Bush's speech at the
Knesset
-> last week was a barn burner before even I read it. Liberals haven't been
this
-> worked up since Rev. Jerry Falwell criticized a cartoon sponge.

Actually it was that rotten gay purple tele-tubby...:-)
-> 
-> 
-> Calling the fight against terrorism "the defining challenge of our time"
--
-> which already confused liberals who think the defining struggle of our
time
-> is against Wal-Mart -- 

I love this woman! :-)




Bush said:
-> 
-> 
-> "Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and
-> radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have
been
-> wrong all along.
-> 
-> 
-> We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into
Poland
-> in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have
talked to
-> Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call
this
-> what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been
repeatedly
-> discredited by history."
-> 
-> 
-> The way liberals squealed, you'd think someone had mentioned Obama's
ears.
->
:-) Talking to is appeasing. It is wrong foolish, bad, and what we have
always been doing.  
-> 
-> Summoning all their womanly anger...

I guess that's sexist, damned if I can figure THAT one out :-)...


, today's Neville Chamberlains "Peace in our time" --So we gove him
Poland...so?


-> it's absurd to compare B. Hussein Obama's

'Just call me
 Barrack, sweetie', :-)

 willingness to "talk" to
-> Ahmadinejad to Neville Chamberlain's capitulation to Hitler.
-> 
-> 
-> Unlike liberals, I will honestly report their point before I attack it.
-> 
-> 
-> The New York Times editorialized: "Sen. Obama has called for talking
with
-> Iran and Syria," but has not "suggested surrendering to these countries'
-> demands, which is, after all, what appeasement is."

Incidentally, Syria is talking with Israel...
-> 
-> 
-> "Hardball's" Chris Matthews gloated all week about nailing a
conservative
-> talk radio host with this brilliant riposte: "You don't understand
there's a
-> difference between talking to the enemy and appeasing. What Neville
-> Chamberlain did wrong ... is not talking to Hitler, but giving him half
of
-> Czechoslovakia."

A Great broadcsst. A lot more than that went on...the above was the least
of it...
-> 
-> 
-> Liberals think all real tyrants ended with Hitler and act as if they would
-> have known all along not to appease him. Next time is always different
for
-> people who refuse to learn from history. As Air America's Mark Green
said:
-> "Look, Hitler was Hitler." (Which, I admit, threw me for a loop: I
thought
-> Air America's position is that Bush is Hitler.)
-> 
-> 
-> This is nonsense. Ahmadinejad looks a lot like Hitler did when
Chamberlain
-> agreed to meet with him at Munich, except that Hitler didn't buy his
suits
-> from ratty thrift shops. Much of England reacted just as today's
Democrats
-> would because, like today's Democrats, they feared nothing more than
another
-> war. (Lloyd George lied, kids died!)
-> 
-> 
-> Lots of Britons cheered when Chamberlain returned from Munich and announced
-> "peace in our time." Without the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, what on
earth
-> makes Chris Matthews think he would not be among them?
-> 
-> 
-> As Bush said at the Knesset, "There are good and decent people who
cannot
-> fathom the darkness in these men and try to explain away their words."
That
-> was Chamberlain. And that is today's Democratic Party.

But the administration carefully analyzed the language, customs, tradition
, religion and 'fathomed the darkness' in these men. Good old George, he
fathoms the darkness in these men as he saw the soul in Putin. :-|


-> 
-> 
-> What Matthews and the Times are saying is this: (BEGIN ITALS)We can have
a
-> Munich, but we promise to be tougher than Chamberlain was.(END ITALS)
Therein
-> lies the flaw in their logic. Yes, in the abstract, it is technically
-> possible to "talk" without giving up Czechoslovakia (or in today's case,
Iraq
-> or Israel).

Hey big breakthough there!

-> 
-> 
-> But in reality, when talking to a lunatic without having first bombed
him
-> into submission, the only possible result is appeasement.

Worthy of thought. :-|

 Any talk with
-> Hitler, or a McHitler like Ahmadinejad, that does not include handing
over
-> Czechoslovakia or Israel, like a game show parting gift, is going to be
a
-> relatively brief chat.
->
Lunatic or Great Satan?

Why are we thinking about warring witn Iran, when Israel can jolly well
take care of itself, with --what?-- 50 nukes rarin' to go? Iran is goin' to
go after THAT?  
-> 
-> Churchill knew that before Chamberlain went to Munich. But a lot of
Britons
-> then, like a lot of Americans today, refused to see that blindingly
obvious
-> point.

Only to those who insist on simplistic solutions to complex problems.
-> 
-> 
-> Liberals think the way to deal with dangerous tyrants is to send in a
-> sensitive president who will make Ahmadinejad fall in love with him...

Yeah, yeah, and Ann (And John McCain)seem to think that Ahmadineejad is
the big cheese in Iran...:-|  

 They
-> imagine Obama becoming Ahmadinejad's psychotherapist...

No, they don't - but what a great idea! A Psychiatrist for President in
2012!
I'd Back Thomas Sazz! 

, like Barbra Streisand
-> in "The Prince of Tides."
Missed it.
 
-> 
-> President Bush described such people perfectly with his reference to
Sen.
-> William Edgar Borah, the one who said World War II could have been
avoided if
-> only he could have talked to Hitler.

I'd sure like details as to what he thought he would say and to what
effect.
(First I've heard of him...)

-> 
-> 
-> Liberals refuse to learn from history because they put their hands over
their
-> ears and tell themselves over and over again: "Hitler was different."

EVERYBODY refuses to learn from history "We did it before and we can do it
again, and we will do it again..." ('40s song I remember...)



-> 
-> 
-> COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER

Thanks for the post. We don't get it up here in the GWN. I suppose I could
get it on line, but I prefer your posts...
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)