Text 7064, 81 rader
Skriven 2008-08-09 15:58:00 av JIM HOLSONBACK (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS SAUER
Ärende: Coulter's Column
========================
-=> On 08-08-08 18:15 ROSS SAUER wrote to JIM HOLSONBACK <=-

<  >
 JH> Interview where he admits to the sex affair which he has repeatedly
 JH> denied will be aired tonight on ABC's Nightline.

 RS> Yeah, nothing sells like sex.

If there's anyone in Fidonet who enjoys a good sex scandal, it is you.
But not so much when it's a Dem, right? Good to see the liberal MSM
types finally getting involved, now that Edwards has finally admitted
it.

 JH> But he claims that even though he hasn't had a paternity test, he
 JH> knows that he can't be the baby daddy in question.  He claims that by
 JH> the time she became pregnant, he had stopped porking her, and by that
 JH> time the porking duties had been passed along and taken over by one of
 JH> his staffers.

 JH> I dunno if he explains in the interview just why he was in that LA
 JH> hotel room in the middle of the night, visiting with mommy and baby.

 JH> Can you imagine what the MSM would have done along with this story if
 JH> Edwards had been a Repub?

 RS> Yeah, even though Edwards isn't running. For anything right now, still
 RS> gotta chase him.

Huh? As recently as 20 June, the AP cited a member of the Congressional
Black Causus saying that Edwards was on Obama's "shortlist" for Veep.
What is the date of the first report you have seen that he is no longer
being considered for that office?  Your excuse is lame - - Edwards is
fair game.

And Edwards certainly was running for President when the Enquirer first
broke the story like 10 months ago, and for the first three of those,
Edwards was still running for President - - but the Liberal MSM sat on
the story, whining that they just could not, try as they might, find any
proof.  Powerless, only when they want to be.


 RS> I mean, it's not like he's Obama, that republican who has stayed
 RS> faithful to his first wife...oh yeah, he's the democrat running for
 RS> president.

Are you 100.0000% positive that Obama has never had a little action on
the side?  How would you react if there were allegations that he had?
Wouldn't you defend him just as you have defended Clinton in the Monica
affair?

 RS> Well, there is the guy running for president on the GOP side, oh
 RS> wait...yeah, he cheated on his first wife, alienating Ron and Nancy
 RS> Reagan, then dumped wife #1 for a really rich trophy wife.

Of course I had to know you would drag a red herring over this, but a
red herring damn near 30 years old?  And _before_ he had entered
politics?

And the "trophy wife" part really bugs you, doesn't it?  So much so that
you were caught putting out a lie about Fred Thompson and his current
wife.  You posted that Fred had dumped his first wife in order to marry
his mistress, but that wasn't in any way true, was it?

And please tell us, when did you ever criticize John F. Kerry (a
catholic) for dumping his first rich wife for a second, who is even
richer?  Too bad Ta-ray-zah isn't more of a trophy, but heck, a guy
can't have everything!

 RS> Oh that's different! he's a REPUBLICAN! So it doesn't count!

 RS> IAOKIYAAR...

Nanoo, nanoo!

- - -  JimH.



... "The horror!  The horror"- Kurtz, in Conrad's "Heart of Darkness"
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)