Text 7105, 133 rader
Skriven 2008-08-13 12:53:00 av JIM HOLSONBACK (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS SAUER
Ärende: Coulter's Column
========================
-=> On 08-09-08 18:12 ROSS SAUER wrote to JIM HOLSONBACK <=-

 <  >
 RS> It's not the sex.
 RS> It's the damn hypocrisy.

That, plus lying about it in front of the American people.

 RS> That's why the Edwards story bugs me somewhat, he used his wife as a
 RS> campaign prop.
 RS> And she knew that she had been used AS a prop, by a guy who had (still
 RS> has?) been fooling around on her.

Sorry, I prefer to leave Mrs. Edwards out of this discussion.

<   >
 JH> Huh? As recently as 20 June, the AP cited a member of the
 JH> Congressional Black Causus saying that Edwards was on Obama's
 JH> "shortlist" for Veep. What is the date of the first report you have
 JH> seen that he is no longer being considered for that office?  Your
 JH> excuse is lame - - Edwards is fair game.

 RS> Back in 2000, Cheney wasn't on Bush's "shortlist."
 RS> I wonder how that turned out? (sarcasm off)

Red herring.

 RS> This "shortlist" is a media concoction. Nothing more.

Oh, did the AP reporter and the member of the Congressional Black Caucus
_lie_?  This is one of the dumbest red herrings ever.  Everyone knows
he has a committee to recomm about VP mate and stuff.  One of the
Kennedy gals is on it, and some man.  There was another man earlier, but
Obama had to throw him under the bus.  (crowded under there)

 JH> And Edwards certainly was running for President when the Enquirer
 JH> first broke the story like 10 months ago, and for the first three of
 JH> those, Edwards was still running for President - - but the Liberal MSM
 JH> sat on the story, whining that they just could not, try as they might,
 JH> find any proof.  Powerless, only when they want to be.

 RS> Would you run a story from the National Enquirer, if you owned a news
 RS> media outlet?

Of course they wouldn't.  What they would do is check out the story for
themselves, and write and run their own story.  This they failed to do.

 RS> How about the Globe?
 RS> They are reporting that George and Laura Bush are already *IN* divorce
 RS> proceedings.

Red herring.

 RS> The Weekly World News went belly up, so now for the really wild-ass
 RS> stories we'll have to go to Fox News.

Red herring.

 RS>> I mean, it's not like he's Obama, that republican who has stayed
 RS>> faithful to his first wife...oh yeah, he's the democrat running
 RS>> for president.

 JH> Are you 100.0000% positive that Obama has never had a little action on
 JH> the side?  How would you react if there were allegations that he had?

 RS> No, I'm not 100% positive.
 RS> Are you 100% positive John McCain didn't have a bunch of boyfriends,
 RS> when he was younger?

Another red herring.  You could think about him sharing a cell in the
Hanoi Hilton with Col. Bud Day for all that time, if you want to pursue
it, and if you want to just make someting up (again).   Who knows what
went on in that cell?  Go ahead, let your mind run wild if you want to
continue doing so.

 RS>> Well, there is the guy running for president on the GOP side, oh
 RS>> wait...yeah, he cheated on his first wife, alienating Ron and
 JH>   Nancy RS> Reagan, then dumped wife #1 for a really rich trophy wife.

 JH> Of course I had to know you would drag a red herring over this, but a
 JH> red herring damn near 30 years old?  And _before_ he had entered
 JH> politics?

 RS> 30 years ago, so what. He still *DID* cheat on his crippled wife, and
 RS> married a woman younger than his frikkin' daughter.

Now that's just FALSE. McCain's first daughter, Sidney, wasn't born
until 1966. McCain's second wife, Cindy, was born in 1954, so she's
about 12 years older than McCain's daughter.  Shame on you, sir!

Aside:  I just love it when you guys get so desperate to change the
subject that you just make up sleazy innuendoes like this.

And if you want to make some sleazy insinuation about McCain being some
sort of a perverted cradle-robber, please be ready to compare this to
the ages of Monica L. (1973) and Chelsea Clinton (1980).  That makes
Monica about 7 years older than Chelsea.

 RS> A rich, dope-addicted wife.

A misleading conflation - her problem with drugs didn't develop until
1989.  They had married back in 1980.  I won't say more about this than
that you, of all people, don't want to "go there" when it comes to
making sleazy comments about people who develop the problem of addiction
to narcotic/analgesic painkillers. Shame on you again.

<  >
 RS> Now...

 RS> Let's look at McBush's campaign, which I call the "Bullshit Talk
 RS> Express."

A typical Sauerism.

 RS> McCain repeated his near-labeling of Obama as a traitor, just this
 RS> week.

Good.  Please tell us all about it, but start your own thread.  This
thread already has more than enough of your red herrings.

 RS> Didn't McBush promise to run a "positive campaign?"
 RS> Yet another in the dozens of McBush's flip-flops.

Heh.  Where are all those race-based attacks Obama's been predicting?
(thereby himself introducing the topic of his race) D'oh!  Add that to
your new thread, if you like.

- - -  JimH.

... "We can't drill our way out of this! Si, se Pueda, NOT!" --Doomocrats

--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)