Text 8293, 70 rader
Skriven 2008-11-17 13:18:00 av Bob Klahn (1:124/311)
     Kommentar till en text av Earl Croasmun
Ärende: Ring around Earl nonsense
=================================
 ...

~>>  As you just asserted, baselessly.

~>>  EC> Open the link and search for the word "update."  It is not
~>>  EC> as extreme as Ceppa's bogus quotations, but the fact
~>>  EC> remains it isn't there.

~>>  Earl... more dishonesty from you. The article in the LA Times
~>>  was the source for the update.

 EC> I was following the link that YOU gave.  I was looking for
 EC> the passage that YOU said was there.   I wanted to know

 There are two links. I gave them both to you. That one was the
 source for the update. You have had the opportunity to see both.
 So, you have been given both the source for the update, and the
 Factcheck article. IOW, whatever order you see them in, by now
 you have had them both spoon fed to you. So all your arguement
 about it is BS.

 EC> what you were talking about, but it turned out that YOU did
 EC> not know what you were talking about.  It wasn't there.

 You have both links. The whole story is there.

 EC> The honest thing for you to do at that point was for you to

 The honest thing for you to do at this point is to either admit
 you have both links, and have verified everything I have said,
 or admit you chose not to and are faking it as you go.

 EC> admit that I was right, acknowledge that you goofed by

 You either know you were wrong, or chose not to follow the
 links.

 EC> confusing that link with another story that you may or may
 EC> not have tossed out somewhere in the thread, own up to the

 You have been given both links. If you chose not to look at one,
 then it is your failure, not mine. There is no pretend, you have
 both links.

 Here they are again, just to make it clear to the whole world.

 www.snipurl.com/mccrash

 www.snipurl.com/crashcheck

 EC> fact that your initial dogmatic "I got it right, you got it
 EC> wrong" response was completely wrong, and vow to be more
 EC> accurate and more open-minded in the future.

 Since *BOTH* links led to the report that McCain said his engine
 failed, but that the evidence was that his engine did not fail,
 then your claim that I got it wrong is a falsehood on your part.

 EC> That is what you should have done.  But you just couldn't
 EC> do it.  Sad.

 Since both links contain the report of McCain's false report,
 and the evidence that it was false, your diversion to which
 report had the word *update* in it is what is truly sad.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)