Text 264, 521 rader
Skriven 2005-01-05 23:33:10 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0501054) for Wed, 2005 Jan 5
===================================================
===========================================================================
President Discusses Medical Liability Reform
===========================================================================
In Focus: Medical Liability">

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
January 5, 2005

President Discusses Medical Liability Reform
Gateway Center
Collinsville, Illinois



˙˙˙˙˙In Focus: Medical Liability

1:13 P.M. CST

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. Please be seated. Thanks for coming out to
say hello. It's great to be in Southern Illinois. (Applause.) I appreciate
the chance to come to Madison County. I'm honored to be the first sitting
President to visit the city of Collinsville. (Applause.) I'm sorry Laura is
not with me.

AUDIENCE: Awww -- (laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: That is generally the reaction. (Laughter.) I was hoping she
and I could go look at the Ketchup bottle. (Laughter and applause.)

Thanks for waiting on me. I had a visit with some of the -- some folks from
the area here: a neurosurgeon, a cardiologist, the administrator of a
hospital, OB/GYN, a patient, all about the health care crisis that exists
here in this part of the world. And that's what I'm here to talk about. I'm
here to talk about how we need to fix a broken medical liability system.
(Applause.)

I want to thank all the good folks who provide health care for the folks in
this part of the world: the nurses, the docs, the administrators. Thank you
all for coming. (Applause.) Thanks for your compassion. Thanks for your
care. Thanks for taking an active interest in an important issue that faces
not only this part of the world, but the country. But really what I'm here
to do is to make -- say as clearly as I can, the United States Congress
needs to pass real medical liability reform this year. (Applause.)

And there's no doubt in my mind we have a strong ally in this issue in the
great Speaker of the House of Representatives form the great state of
Illinois, Denny Hastert. (Applause.)And I want to thank Congressman John
Shimkus for his for his leadership, not only on this issue, but on other
issues. (Applause.) It's good to be with his wife, Karen, again; sons,
David, Joshua and Daniel. Nice to see you boys. (Applause.) And you brought
Mom and Dad. Your Mom is probably telling you what to do, just like mine
is. (Laughter.) You're probably listening about half the time, just like I
am. (Laughter.) Welcome.

I'm also proud to be traveling today with a great Congressman from Peoria,
Illinois, Ray LaHood. Thank you, sir. Appreciate you coming. (Applause.)
The State Treasurer of Illinois has joined us, Judy Baar Topinka.
Appreciate you. (Applause.) Tom Cross is here -- he's the Minority Leader
in the House. I'll tell you what he's doing in the House of Representatives
for the state of Illinois. He is leading the medical liability reform
effort. And I want to thank you, Tom, for taking a strong role. Appreciate
you coming. (Applause.)

I know the Mayor is here. Mr. Mayor -- yes, he's here, Stan Schaeffer, I
appreciate you coming, Mr. Mayor. Appreciate you being here. (Applause.) I
usually like to give mayors unsolicited advice: Fill the potholes.
(Laughter.) You've probably got some advice for me: Pass the highway bill.
(Laughter.)

I want to thank those of you who are working on this medical liability
issue here in the state of Illinois. I appreciate your efforts. Look, it's
about time the medical profession gets involved. It's about time you let
people know what's on your mind. It's time to make sure that the issue
comes to the forefront, not only at the federal level, but at the local
level, as well.

I want to thank Connie Bergmann. I met Connie. She came out to the airport,
air base, and -- kind of air base-airport combo, I guess it is. She is a
volunteer for the American Red Cross. The reason I bring her up is, every
stop I make in America I like to herald a citizen who's taken time out of
his or her life to volunteer to make the country a better place. See, the
great strength of America is not our military might and it's certainly not
the size of our wallets. The great strength of America lies in the hearts
and souls of our fellow citizens, people who are willing to love a neighbor
just like they'd like to be loved themselves; people who are willing to
take time to volunteer to make America a better place. And Connie Bergmann
is such a person. And I want to thank you for serving the Red Cross.
(Applause.)

And speaking about the Red Cross, the International Red Cross is doing
heroic work in a part of the world that has suffered incredible, incredible
death and destruction. The American people express our sympathy to the
victims of the tsunami disasters.

Yesterday, I spoke to Secretary of State Colin Powell and Governor Jeb Bush
of Florida, who I sent on a delegation -- with a delegation to assess the
relief operations. And they reported that the devastation is beyond
comprehension. They also reported in that they will come back with an
assessment about how we can more effectively help. But they also reported
that our military is doing heroic work in helping to save life. They're
flying rescue missions 24 hours a day. They're making a huge difference in
the people's lives over there by delivering supplies directly to those in
need. Our government has not only stepped up with the use of military
assets, but we have pledged $350 million in disaster assistance to help the
people over there who are suffering.

There's huge generosity here in America, as well. As you know, I tapped a
couple of ex-Presidents -- (laughter) -- number 41 and number 42 -- to help
out. (Applause.) I asked them to help, and they are. My Dad and President
Clinton have graciously given of their time to help make sure that people
know there is a need and to make sure the donations are properly channeled
into programs that work. If you want to help, get on the Internet for the
USA -- www.usafreedomcorps.gov. There's a place to help. And on that web
page, you'll find different agencies which are doing the good work.

What I don't want is, I don't want people to be sending money to places
that aren't really doing the job. We don't need to support organizations
that aren't effectively delivering compassion and help. And so on this web
page, you'll find a way to help, if you so desire to do so. What they tell
me is the most important contribution a person can give is cash, and let
the agencies on the ground be able to use that cash to best meet the needs
of those who have suffered.

I want to thank all the Americans who, thus far, have been participating in
this urgent cause. You're showing the true strength of America through your
good heart.

I don't know if you know this, this is my first trip after the New Year,
and it's good to come here to Illinois. (Applause.) I'm rested and ready to
continue to serve to be your -- to continue to be your President and to
serve the people of this country. And we've got a big agenda item -- a big
agenda and a series of items that we'll be dealing with. First of all,
we're going to win the war on terror. We've still got to -- (applause.) We
will be steadfast, we will be resolved, we'll be wise. We won't give in to
these people.

We have a duty in your government to protect the American people. So the
second big task at hand is to make sure we do everything we can to protect
our homeland. And I will assure you I will continue to work to spread
freedom and democracy, and therefore, peace, in parts of the world that are
desperate for freedom, democracy, and peace. (Applause.)

We're going to work with the Congress to be wise about how we spend your
money. We're going to keep your taxes low so this economy continues to
grow. We're going to continue to work with our farmers and ranchers to make
sure they can sell the products overseas, in markets where people need food
and beef and pork. We're going to work to pass a national energy plan.
We're going to work to cut our deficit in half over the next five years.
(Applause.)

And I look forward to working with members of both political parties to do
something about our health care system. First, it is important for
Americans to understand we have the best health care system in the world.
(Applause.) And we need to keep it that way. We've got the best hospitals,
both urban and rural. We've got the world's most talented and compassionate
doctors and nurses. And we've got the world's -- and we lead the world in
innovative research. We're on the cutting edge of change. We're saving
lives through our research. Americans should be proud of our medical
system, and we all must be grateful for those who work hard to provide
compassion and care.

Our health care system faces serious challenges; we all know that. The cost
of health care is rising rapidly, and that burdens our families, it hurts
our small businesses, it makes it harder for the job creators to expand the
job base. Too many Americans are left struggling to find affordable health
care. And so I think we need to take practical steps to make sure this
health care system of ours is more affordable and available, and we've got
to take those steps this year.

To improve health care in America, we need to expand the use of health
savings accounts. (Applause.) It's a product that lets you save tax-free
for routine medical care while keeping affordable coverage against major
illness. Small businesses must be allowed to join together, to pool risk,
so they can buy insurance for their employees at the same discounts that
big businesses are able to do. (Applause.)

To address the cost of medical care, we need to apply 21st century
information technology to the health care field. We need to have our
medical records put on the IT. We need to make sure that we speed up the
delivery and arrival of cheaper generic drugs to help control costs. We
want to make sure our Medicare system still allows seniors to have choice
in the system.

There's a lot we can do. We got to make sure we expand community health
centers around our country to provide care for the poor and the indigent.
And we got to make sure low-income children are enrolled in government
health care programs so they receive the care they need. These are
practical steps to help people be able to find health care at affordable
prices, and at the same time, make sure the health care system is not run
by the federal government, but by patients and doctors. (Applause.)

To make sure our health care system works the way we want it to work, we've
got to address the root causes of rising medical costs. Part of addressing
those costs can be achieved by introducing information technology. Part of
addressing those costs can be achieved by introducing generic drugs faster,
just like I mentioned.

Some of the cost increases in our health care system are necessary and
worthwhile. After all, research into new treatments requires major
investments. World-class medical technology is expensive. In other words,
to stay on the leading edge of medicine, it costs money. And I suspect
somebody whose life has been saved by the latest technology is going to say
that cost increase was necessary. But some costs are not necessary. And
that's what the American people must understand, and members of the United
States Senate and the United States House must understand.

Many of the costs that we're talking about don't start in an examining room
or an operating room. They start in a courtroom. (Applause.) What's
happening all across this country is that lawyers are filing baseless suits
against hospitals and doctors. That's just a plain fact. (Applause.) And
they're doing it for a simple reason. They know the medical liability
system is tilted in their favor. (Applause.) Jury awards in medical
liability cases have skyrocketed in recent years. That means every claim
filed by a personal injury lawyer brings the chance of a huge payoff or a
profitable settlement out of court. That's what that means. Doctors and
hospitals realize this. They know it's expensive to fight a lawsuit, even
if it doesn't have any merit. And because the system is so unpredictable,
there is a constant risk of being hit by a massive jury award. So doctors
end up paying tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars
to settle claims out of court, even when they know they have done nothing
wrong.

That's what's happening in the system today. It's a system that's just not
fair. It's costly for the doctors; it's costly for small businesses; it's
costly for hospitals; it is really costly for patients. (Applause.)

When those providing insurance have to pay the bills for enormous jury
verdicts or out-of-court settlements, they have to raise premiums on
physicians they cover. Specialists in high-risk practices like OB/GYN or
neurosurgery are particularly vulnerable to lawsuits. So their premiums
rise the fastest. You're about to hear a couple of stories of folks in this
area who can testify to that fact.

Because junk lawsuits are so unpredictable, they drive up insurance costs
for all doctors, even for those who have never been sued; even for those
who have never had a claim against them. When insurance premiums rise,
doctors have no choice but to pass some of the costs on to their patients.
That means you're paying for junk lawsuits every time you go to see your
doctor. That's the effect of all the lawsuits. It affects your wallet. If
you're a patient, it means you're paying a higher cost to go see your
doctor. If part of the national strategy has got to be to make sure health
care is available and affordable, health care becomes less affordable
because of junk lawsuits.

And that's what the people of Southern Illinois and the people of America
must understand, that every time you read about big jury verdicts or
out-of-court settlements or lawsuits being filed here or there, you're
paying for it.

For some physicians, even raising costs for patients isn't enough to afford
the premium increases caused by these lawsuits. And so, physicians are
faced with a terrible choice: give up medicine entirely, or to move to
another place where they can afford to practice medicine. And that problem
affects all doctors from family practitioners in rural towns to surgeons in
big city hospitals.

In 2003, almost half of all American hospitals lost physicians or reduced
services because of medical liability concerns. Think about that. One-half
of all American hospitals lost physicians. Over the past two years, the
liability crisis has forced out about 160 physicians in Madison and St.
Clair Counties alone. When doctors move or close their practices, guess who
suffers. The patients; the people who live in these good town in this part
of the world. Pregnant women have to travel longer distances for checkups.
Accident victims lose critical minutes in transit to faraway emergency
rooms. New residents, people you're trying to get to come and live in your
communities have a hard time finding doctors willing to accept extra
patients. And that causes the quality of life in your community to
deteriorate. It's a problem that we must address.

America's health care professionals should be focused on fighting
illnesses, not on fighting lawsuits. (Applause.) Junk lawsuits change the
way docs do their job. Instead of trying to heal the patients, doctors try
not to get sued. Makes sense, doesn't it? If you're worried about getting
sued, you're going to do everything you can to make sure you don't get
sued. That's why doctors practice what's called defensive medicine. That
means they're writing prescriptions or ordering tests that really aren't
necessary, just to reduce the potential of a future lawsuit.

They have specialists who stop taking emergency room calls. Doctors turn
away patients with complicated, life-threatening conditions because they
carry the highest risk for a lawsuit. Defensive medicine drives a wedge
between the doctors and the patients, and defensive medicine is incredibly
costly for our society. Altogether, defensive medicine drains some $60
billion to $100 billion from the economy. Defensive medicine raises medical
bills for patients and increases insurance costs for employers and it takes
money away that small businesses could use to invest and expand.

This liability system of ours is, what I'm telling you, is out of control.
And you people in this area and the doctors in this area understand what
I'm talking about. A recent study ranked Madison County the number one
place in the country for trial lawyers to sue. And that's a ranking I'm
sure you'd like to get rid of. (Applause.) And those of you traveling in
from St. Clair County aren't doing much better. (Laughter.) St. Clair is
ranked the second county in America where you're likely to get sued. In
other words, if you see a team of trial lawyers spending a lot of time in
the Collinsville area, you can be pretty sure they're not looking for
horseradish. (Laughter and applause.)

Let me share some of the stories of the folks I met with today. I think
this will help clarify what I'm trying to say to you. Dr. Chris Heffner is
with us. He's a neurosurgeon from Belleville Memorial and St. Elizabeth
Hospitals. Raise your hand, Doc. (Applause.) He is one of only two
neurosurgeons still practicing south of Springfield, Illinois. You've got
two people in the area. In just two years, his annual premiums have more
than doubled, from $131,000 a year to $265,000 a year. And at the same
time, his amount of insurance coverage has been cut in half.

A few years ago, Chris decided that closing his head trauma part of his
practice was the only way he could afford to stay in this area. He told me
he loves living here in this part of the world. He likes to raise his
family here. He and his wife made a tough decision to stay here, in spite
of the fact that his premiums doubled and he got half the coverage. And so
the only way he could stay here and to provide a level of care that he
wants everybody to have was to cut out part of his practice. He still
treats dozens of patients with spinal cord injuries, but now brain trauma
victims in Southern Illinois have to be airlifted across the river to St.
Louis. He said, "It's very distressing. I spent years of training to do
brain surgery. It's a big part of my life. I made a commitment to stay
here, but I had to make adjustments to keep the ax from falling." The
system needs to be fixed. (Applause.)

Dr. Greg Gabliani is with us. (Applause.) He's from Alton, and he is a
cardiologist. He was raised in Quincy and he moved to Madison County in
2001, even though his colleagues warned him about the medical liability
crisis here. In three years, his premiums have risen from $12,500 to
$60,000 a year -- three quick years. Last year he had to stop performing
certain procedures to bring his costs under control. He said, "You either
have to change the nature of your practice or you have to leave." He didn't
want to leave. So he's having to cut back on his services. We've got a
problem, folks. (Applause.)

I met with Bob Moore. He's the CEO of Red Bud Regional Hospital. There's
big Bob. (Applause.) He's a father of six, I want you to know. (Laughter.)
His hospital has a long tradition of delivering babies, but this past
November, he made the difficult decision to close his OB unit. The
malpractice -- see, he had the -- they employ the doctors in his hospital.
They become the employer. They're going to cover the insurance for them,
and it doubled from $150,000 to $270,000 -- more than doubled. They're
paying $270,000 a year now. That's a lot for a little hospital in a small
town. Maybe for a big hospital, it's not a lot, or for those of us who are
used to dealing with the federal budget, it's not a lot. (Laughter.) It's a
lot for a small-town hospital.

Red Bud used to handle 120 deliveries a year. But now a lot of the women
have to drive an hour to get to an OB unit. He said, "You wouldn't get an
OB/GYN to come here. It's affecting rural medicine." "It" happens to be the
medical liability crisis, is affecting rural medicine. Lawsuits are
affecting rural medicine. It's a societal issue that has to be dealt with.
I couldn't put it any better, Bob. It is a societal issue that we must deal
with. It is a quality of life issue. We don't want our little towns being
-- not having any health care. We want people to live in rural America,
like Crawford, Texas -- (laughter) -- to be able to get -- to have a
quality of life -- (applause.)

Leslie Scariano is with us. She is a -- (applause) -- OB/GYN from Alton.
She spent her entire career as a doctor in Southern Illinois and she has
never been sued. She is a good doc. (Applause.) She shut down her practice
on December the 31st of this year because her premiums have skyrocketed out
of control. That means she couldn't afford to stay in practice. She had a
choice to make: quit practicing medicine or go broke. She said, "I don't
want to quit practicing medicine and I'm not going broke, so I'm going to
move to Colorado." You lost a good soul from this part of the world because
the system is out of control. (Applause.) Leslie's premiums will be about
80 percent lower in Colorado that here in Illinois.

I met with Kim Vogel, who is right with us -- yes, there she is.
(Applause.) She was one of Leslie's patients. She's expecting her second
child early next month -- like, soon. (Laughter.) When she found out she
was pregnant last year, Kim started seeing the OB/GYN that delivered her
daughter, Katie. That OB/GYN moved to Tennessee. Then she started seeing
Leslie. Leslie is moving to Colorado. Kim is now on her third OB/GYN, and
she's worried about it. She said, "I understand the doctors' position. I
don't blame them. But as a patient, I see them leave and I think, what am I
going to do now and where does that leave me? I feel like I've lost control
over how my pregnancy will go."

Unfortunately, this is not just a story confined to this part of the world.
This is a story of pregnant moms all over America who are wondering whether
or not they're going to be able to find good quality health care for their
child and themselves.

I've come to this part of the world because I want to assure you that, one,
I understand the problem and I intend to work with Congress to do something
about it. You know, when I was the Governor of Texas, I felt that we could
solve medical liability issues at the state level. And there was two things
wrong with that strategy. One is that a state would pass good medical
liability reform, and all the trial lawyers would do is go to the state
that has lousy medical liability law. So you're not solving the problem,
you're just shifting the problem. You're making the quality of life issue
go from one area -- the deterioration of quality of life issue go from one
area to the next. That didn't seem to make any sense.

But the other thing I discovered is that because of medical liability
problems and lawsuits and increasing premiums and the defensive practice of
medicine, your federal budget spends $28 billion a year extra money. See,
we have to pay for Medicaid and Medicare and veterans' benefits. The rising
cost of health care, the number of lawsuits, the defensive practice of
medicine is driving up the cost to our taxpayers. Medical liability reform
is a national issue and it requires a national solution. (Applause.)

So I went to Congress with some proposals that I think are fair, proposals
that will build confidence in the judicial system. Nobody likes to come to
a part of the world that says the judicial system is out of control and
people lose confidence in it. We've got to have confidence in the fairness
of our system. We want people who are harmed to be able to get -- have
their day in court and get fair treatment in the courts of law. But we want
-- we don't want a system that's so tilted the other way that it runs good
doctors out of business and makes it hard for hospitals to deliver care.

I believe a victim of a legitimate medical error should be allowed to
collect full economic damages, 100 percent of the cost of their medical
care and recovery, plus economic losses for the rest of their life. Seems
to be fair, if you get hurt. (Applause.) And when appropriate, injured
people should be allowed to collect reasonable non-economic damages. And in
the case of truly egregious wrongdoing, patients should be entitled to
punitive damages. But there needs to be some reason, when it comes to
non-economic damages in the system, and that's why I proposed a hard cap of
$250,000 on non-economic damages. (Applause.)

Interestingly enough, the state of California has a cap on non-economic
damages that was enacted in 1975. Patients in that state see their claims
settled a third faster than states without those limits. In other words,
patients are treated more fairly where there's a cap. And since 1975,
insurance premiums for California doctors have become much more affordable
premiums than anywhere else in the country -- than in most states. Caps on
non-economic damages work. It's a good idea and the Congress ought to adopt
them. (Applause.)

We have another problem with our legal system, and that is trial lawyers
sometimes sue all the doctors involved in the patient's case even if most
of the doctors have nothing to do with the patient's injuries. It's simply
unfair to punish doctors who have done nothing wrong. (Applause.) And so,
to make sure doctors and hospitals are treated fairly, Congress needs to
pass joint and several liability reform. (Applause.)

I think the people are beginning to understand the importance of this
issue. I know you do. I know the people of this part of the world
understand it, because you see firsthand what happens when the system gets
out of control -- 160 docs leave two counties. People understand that no
patient has ever been healed by a frivolous lawsuit; no small business has
ever grown because of a frivolous lawsuit; the cause of justice is never
served by frivolous lawsuit.

I know you're serious about this liability issue here. I talked about it
everywhere I went on the campaign -- nearly everywhere I went on the
campaign trail, and I believe the voters made their position clear on
election day about medical liability. (Applause.)

The House passed a medical liability reform bill last year. I want to thank
the two members of Congress for working on it. The Senate failed to get the
job done. Well, the new Congress is starting over, you know, we've got a
new chance to get something done for the -- on behalf of the American
people. Both Houses will have a fresh opportunity to address this issue.
I'm looking forward to working with the leadership of the House to get the
bill moving. It's important for the United States senators from this state
and other states to recognize the significance of the problem -- (applause)
-- and get a meaningful, real medical liability bill to my desk so I can
sign it in the year 2005. (Applause.)

Junk lawsuits affect more than just the medical field. According to a
recent study, frivolous litigation has helped drive the total cost of our
tort system to more than $230 billion a year. That's the equivalent of
$3,200 for every family of four. The lawsuit burden falls especially hard
on small businesses. And yet, small businesses are the engine of job -- are
the engines of job creation in our country. Seventy percent of all new jobs
in America are created by small businesses. (Applause.) The tort costs in
America are now far higher than in any other major industrialized nation.
Think about that. We live in a competitive world, this is a global economy
-- and so our tort system has become a needless disadvantage for American
manufacturers and entrepreneurs.

And so here are some actions Congress can take, as well. To protect small
businesses and workers, we need to change the way we handle class-action
lawsuits. (Applause.) Interestingly enough, this is another problem you
know well in Madison County. The number of class-actions filed here
increased by over 5,000 percent between 1998 and 2003, even though the vast
majority of defendants named in those suits are not actually from Madison
County. Think about that. These massive interstate class-actions clog your
local courts. They hurt the honest workers and communities of the
businesses targeted by the class-action lawyers. The proper place for large
interstate class-actions to be tried is not in a local court, but rather in
a federal court, which are designed -- (applause.)

I look forward to working with both bodies and members of both parties to
get good class-action reform out of the Congress this year. I'll also work
with Congress to reform asbestos litigation. (Applause.) Asbestos lawsuits
in Southern Illinois and elsewhere have led to the bankruptcy of dozens of
companies, and cost tens of thousands of jobs. Many asbestos claims are
filed on behalf of people who are not sick. The volume of asbestos lawsuits
is beyond the capacity of our courts to handle, and it is growing. More
than 100,000 new asbestos claims were filed last year alone. Congress has
begun considering options to improve the current system for handling
asbestos lawsuits. They need to act and get the job done. I look forward to
signing an asbestos reform in 2005. (Applause.)

I think we're sent to Washington to solve problems, not to pass them on to
future Congresses. I believe we are called to do the hard work to make our
communities and quality of life a better place. And it's hard work for some
in Congress to stand up to the trial lawyers. I understand that. But all
we're asking for is fairness. We want our doctors treated fairly; we want
the hospitals treated fairly; and most of all, we want the patients and the
American people treated fairly. (Applause.)

And I appreciate you all giving me a chance to come by and talk about the
vital issue of legal reform. I intend to go back to Washington here
shortly, and when I see members of the Congress, as I work this issue, I'm
going to say, I spoke to the good folks of Southern Illinois; they
understand the problem, and they expect you, members of the United States
Senate and the United States House of Representatives, to get the job done.
(Applause.)

Thanks for coming by to say hello. I hope you and your families have a
blessed and healthy 2005. May God bless you all. (Applause.)

END 1:56 P.M. CST
===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/01/20050105-4.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)