Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4277
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   28499
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2014
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6000
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33805
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   23541
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12847
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4193
FN_SYSOP   41525
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13584
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16053
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22012
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   900
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4785
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1117
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   2793
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13064
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2055
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
Möte WHITEHOUSE, 5187 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 3565, 525 rader
Skriven 2006-11-02 23:32:30 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0611023) for Thu, 2006 Nov 2
===================================================

===========================================================================
Remarks by the President at Montana Victory 2006 Rally
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
November 2, 2006

Remarks by the President at Montana Victory 2006 Rally
MetraPark Arena
Billings, Montana



11:27 A.M. MDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you for the warm welcome. It's good to be in a part of
the world where the cowboy hats outnumber the ties. (Applause.) And I'm
proud to be here in Big Sky country, with a fine United States Senator in
Conrad Burns. (Applause.) You might call him a plain-spoken fellow.
(Laughter.) As a matter of fact, I've heard some of them say that he's a
little rough on the English language. (Laughter.) Where have I heard that
before? (Laughter.)

Conrad, I'm keeping good company. (Applause.) We don't need a lot of
double-speak in Washington. I think somebody who speaks plainly for the
values of Montana is somebody you need to send back as your United States
Senator. (Applause.)

Laura sends her love. (Applause.) Conrad and I married above ourselves.
(Laughter.) I'm really proud to be here with Phyllis Burns. Phyllis, thank
you for coming. (Applause.) There's nothing better than having a First Lady
that you can be proud of. And I'm really proud of my First Lady, and I know
you are, as well. (Applause.) She knows Phyllis and Conrad well, and she
joins me in saying, for the good of this state and for the good of the
United States, send Conrad Burns back to Washington. (Applause.)

I'm proud to be here with Denny Rehberg. He's one of the strong members of
the United States Congress. (Applause.) Given my age and Conrad's age, I
guess you could say he's a young star. (Laughter.) But I'm proud to be with
Denny and Jan. I want to thank the Secretary of State Brad Johnson, who is
with us; the former Governor, Judy Martz is with us. I want to thank all
the grassroots activists. Here's what a grassroots activist is: A
grassroots activist is somebody who is putting up the signs and making the
phone calls and turning out the vote. I want to thank you in advance for
what you're going to do in these last days of the campaign: turn out the
vote and send this man back to Washington. (Applause.)

And I know you'll join me in sprinting to the finish line. It's interesting
what's happening in Washington, however. Some of them are already measuring
the drapes for their new offices. (Laughter.) See, they think this election
is over. They don't understand that the people of Montana haven't voted
yet. (Applause.)

We've been through this before. You might remember 2004. Some of them were
picking out their new offices in the West Wing. (Laughter.) The movers
never got the call. (Laughter.) And the same thing is going to happen on
November the 7th. We will win the Senate, and we will win the House.
(Applause.)

And we're going to win these elections because we understand the values and
priorities of the American people. (Applause.) We're going to win this
election because our values and our priorities do not shift because of the
latest public opinion poll. (Applause.) We're going to win because we've
got an optimistic and hopeful agenda.

Let me tell you something about Conrad Burns. I've worked with him closely.
He understands that when the ag economy is strong, the national economy
benefits. (Applause.) He spends a lot of time talking to me about --
saying, let's get those foreign markets open for Montana beef. (Applause.)
We worked together on a good piece of farm legislation that's helped
Montana's farmers and ranchers. (Applause.) If I were a farmer and rancher
in this state I'd want to make sure this man is sent back to the United
States Senate. (Applause.)

We got a lot to do. We're going to continue to work to make sure this
country is less dependent on foreign oil. (Applause.) So we worked together
to pass good energy legislation that supports conservation, expands
domestic production, and invests in cutting-edge technologies. You got a
lot of coal in this state. It's very important for us to be able to use
your coal in environmentally friendly ways. That's why Conrad Burns
promotes clean coal technology. (Applause.) And we're also investing to
bring alternative sources of fuel, like ethanol and biodiesel, to the
markets quicker. Here's what I want. I want Montana farmers growing crops
that fuel our automobiles so I can tell the American people we're less
dependent on oil from parts of the world where people don't like us.
(Applause.)

And Senator Conrad Burns understands the importance of having good judges
on the federal bench. (Applause.) We believe that judges ought to strictly
interpret the law and not legislate from the bench. (Applause.) Confirming
federal judges is one of the most important responsibilities of the Senate,
and it is one of the most important issues at stake in this election.
(Applause.)

When the people of Montana cast the ballot on Tuesday, your vote will
determine more than who represents you in the Montana -- from Montana in
the Senate. It will also determine what kind of judges sit on federal
courts all across the United States. (Applause.)

At this moment, there are 50 vacancies on the federal bench, and it is
vital to maintain a Republican Senate so we can confirm the men and women I
have nominated to fill those positions. (Applause.) Our record on
appointing judges is clear. With the support of senators like Conrad Burns,
we have confirmed good judges, solid thinkers to the district court, to the
circuit courts, and to the Supreme Court. (Applause.)

America is better off because John Roberts and Sam Alito are now serving on
the Supreme Court of the United States. (Applause.) The people of Montana
have got to understand a vote for a Democrat senator would be a vote
against highly qualified judges like these. All you have to do is look at
the record. When the Democrats held the Senate, they denied a hearing to
over one-third of my nominees for the Court of Appeals. When they lost the
majority in 2002, the Democrats didn't change their tactics. They
filibustered or opposed 19 of my nominees to the Court of Appeals.

They tried to use the same tactics when Sam Alito's Supreme Court
nomination came before the Senate. More than half of the Senate Democrats
voted to filibuster him. And when he finally did get a vote, 40 of the 44
Democrats voted, no. If the Democrats had their way, this man would not be
sitting on the Supreme Court.

John Roberts had to overcome strong Democrat opposition in the Senate to
make it to the federal bench. More than a decade ago, another President
Bush nominated John Roberts to serve on the D.C. Court of Appeals. A
Democrat-controlled Senate denied even a hearing. When I took office, I
renominated him to that seat, and another Democrat Chairman of the Senate
Judiciary denied him a hearing. I think you're beginning to see the
pattern. It was only after the Republicans took the Senate back in 2002
that John Roberts got his hearing and got his vote, and was confirmed for
the D.C. Circuit. (Applause.) Then I put him up for the Supreme Court, and
we confirmed him as Chief Justice last year.

I want you to hear this loud and clear: If the Democrats controlled the
Senate, John Roberts would not be the Chief Justice today. He'd still be
waiting for the Democrats to give him a hearing for his seat on the Court
of Appeals. (Applause.) If the people of Montana want good judges, judges
who will not legislate from the bench, judges like John Roberts and Sam
Alito, you vote for Conrad Burns for the United States Senate. (Applause.)

There's a lot of big issues facing the voters around the country. The two
biggest issues are these: Which party is going to keep your taxes low and
keep this economy growing; and which party is going to take the necessary
steps to protect you in this war on terror. (Applause.)

First, let me talk about taxes. See, we have a philosophy -- Conrad and
Denny and I have a philosophy -- we believe that you know how to spend your
money far better than the federal government does. (Applause.) That stands
in stark contrast to the Democrats, who want to take more of your own money
because they think they can spend it better than you can spend it.

AUDIENCE: Booo!

THE PRESIDENT: We believe that when you have more money in your pocket to
save, invest, or spend, the economy benefits. (Applause.) The difference
between some of them in Washington and those on the stage here is we don't
just talk philosophy, we act. And so we passed the largest tax cuts since
Ronald Reagan was the President. (Applause.) We cut taxes for everybody who
pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit. We reduced the marriage
penalty. We cut taxes on small businesses. We cut taxes on capital gains
and dividends to encourage investment and jobs. And to reward family
farmers and small business owners for a lifetime of hard work, we put the
death tax on the road to extinction. (Applause.)

We got a record to run on. You might remember the debate in Washington --
the Democrats predicted the tax cuts would not create jobs, they predicted
they would not increase wages and they said the federal deficit would
explode. Well, the facts are in. The truth is the tax cuts have led to a
growing economy that has added 6.6 million new jobs since August of 2003.
The unemployment rate in the great state of Montana is 3.6 percent.
(Applause.) Real wages are on the rise, and we cut the deficit in half
three years ahead of schedule. (Applause.) The tax cuts we passed are
working. (Applause.)

The Democrats are going to raise your taxes. They got a record, too, they
just don't want you to know about it. Interestingly enough, the top
Democrat leader in the House made this statement, she said, "we love tax
cuts," speaking about the Democrats. Well, given her record, she must be a
secret admirer. (Laughter and applause.)

She and her party voted against reducing the marriage penalty. They voted
against cutting taxes on small businesses. They voted against lowering
taxes for families with children. They voted against reducing capital gains
and income -- dividends, taxes on dividends and capital gains. They voted
against getting rid of the death tax. They voted against every single tax
cut.

Time and time again when the Democrats in Washington had a opportunity to
show their love for tax cuts, they voted no. If that's their idea of love,
I sure would hate to see what hate looks like. (Applause.)

Those House Democrats have got a lot of company in the Senate, too. We cut
taxes in 2003; 46 of 48 Democrats voted against it. During the debate over
tax cuts, one senior Democrat in the Senate called our policies insulting.
See, there's a mind set; when you get in that box, I want you to remember,
there's a mind set amongst the Democrats: It's insulting for you to have
more of your own money. And others said the tax cuts were the wrong
prescription for our economy.

When people in Montana get in that voting booth, you remember what those
tax cuts have done for our economy. If they take control of the Senate and
the Congress, they don't have to lift a finger to raise your taxes. See,
these tax cuts are set to expire. And their leaders have said they're going
to let it expire. And if those tax cuts expire, it means your taxes are
going up.

Let me give you an example. If the child tax credit were to go from $1,000
to $500 per child -- which is what would happen if these tax cuts were not
extended or made permanent -- those of you with children get to pay
$500-a-child tax increases. So when you get home this evening, I want you
to think about the Democrat plan for you. You can go around the table and
count the number of children that are eating dinner, and you can multiple
that by $500 a child. So if you've got four children and it's $500 a child
-- the Democrats win, you're paying $2,000 more in taxes. That may not seem
like a lot to the Democrats in Washington, D.C., but Conrad and I know it's
a lot, and that's why we're going to keep your taxes low. (Applause.)

I want you to not fall prey to one other trick the Democrats like to say.
They like to say, oh, we're just going to tax the rich; we'll only tax
people who make a lot of money. That's not how it works in Washington.
Their spending appetite exceeds their capacity to raise taxes. You might
remember 1992, they went around the country saying, vote for us, we'll give
the middle class a tax cut. Well, that middle-class tax cut turned out to
be the largest tax increases in the history of the United States. When it
comes to taxes, the Democrats are going to tax whoever they can find, and
we're not going to let them because we're going to put Conrad Burns back in
the United States Senate. (Applause.)

This election is taking place in an historic time for this country. When
our children and grandchildren look back on this period, one question will
overwhelm all the rest: Did we do everything in our power to fight and win
the war on terror? I wish I could report to you that there wasn't a war,
but there is. There's still an enemy that like -- would like to strike the
United States. These people are brutal. They have no conscience. They do
have an ideology. They believe exactly the opposite of what we believe. We
believe in basic freedoms: freedom to worship, freedom to dissent, freedom
to speak. They do not believe in those freedoms.

And yet, they have a plan that says they're going to extend their vision as
far as they can extend it. It's called a caliphate. You cannot negotiate
with these people. You cannot hope for the best in dealing with these
people. The best way to protect the American people is to find them and
bring them to justice before they hurt us again. (Applause.)

So our strategy is two-fold. We're on the offense overseas, and we're doing
everything we can to protect you here at home. And it's a tough task
because the enemy only has to be right one time, and we have got to be
right a hundred percent of the time to do our most important job, which is
to protect the American people.

And so that is why, after the enemy hit us, I worked to figure out ways to
give the professionals on the front line of protecting you the tools
necessary to do so. There was a wall that prevented our intelligence folks
from sharing information with law enforcement. In this different kind of
war, we need to have the best kind of intelligence so we can protect you.
We need to know what the enemy is thinking so that we can do everything we
can to stop attacks. (Applause.)

We designed a piece of legislation that protects our citizens and protects
our civil liberties. It was called the Patriot Act. And this act --
(applause) -- and this vital law has helped break up terror cells across
the United States. It's an important piece of legislation. If you expect
the President and the professionals in Washington to do our jobs and
protect you, you must put people in the Congress who will make sure we have
the tools to do so. (Applause.)

When it comes to this piece of legislation, the Senate Democrats wanted to
have it both ways. In the 2000, 2001, the Senate passed this bill 98 to
one. But when the bill came up for renewal in 2005, the Senate Democrats
filibustered it. In fact, the Senate leader bragged, we killed the Patriot
Act. There's just a different mind set in Washington amongst these people.

The Democrat attempt to filibuster the Patriot Act follows an approach that
might sound familiar. They voted for it, right before they voted against
it. (Laughter.) Well, thanks to senators like Conrad Burns, we overcame
their filibuster. And I signed this important piece of legislation.
(Applause.)

I want to talk about two other measures, two other steps I've taken to make
sure that this government of ours can protect you. If al Qaeda is making a
phone call into the United States, or an affiliate of al Qaeda is making a
phone call into the United States, we want to know why. We want to know why
they're making a call into our country. (Applause.) So when we created -- I
sent this bill up to the House, Denny supported it; 90 percent of the
Democrats voted against it. It hasn't made it to the Senate floor yet, but
rest assured, the folks there have a different attitude about what it takes
to protect you. I felt it was important in this different kind of war to
understand what the enemy is thinking.

And so when we captured people off the battlefield, I instructed the
professionals at the Central Intelligence Agency to interrogate them.
(Applause.) We picked up a man named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- let me tell
you about him. Our intelligence folks thinks he was the mastermind of the
September the 11th attacks. He's the person that organized and ordered the
attacks. When we picked him up, I felt it was important, in order to
protect you, that we found out what he knew. See, if he was the mastermind
of one attack, he might be masterminding another attack, and therefore it
made sense, if our most important job is to protect you, to find out what
he knew.

This bill came on the Senate floor. Conrad Burns strongly supported.
Seventy percent of the Senate Democrats voted against it.

AUDIENCE: Booo!

THE PRESIDENT: On all these vital measures -- measures necessary to fight
and win the war on terror -- the Democrats in Washington have followed a
simple philosophy: Just say no. When it comes to listening on to the
terrorist -- listening to the terrorists, what's the Democrats' answer?
Just say no. When it comes to detaining terrorists, what's the Democrats'
answer?

AUDIENCE: Just say no.

THE PRESIDENT: When it came time to renew the Patriot Act, what was the
Democrats' answer?

AUDIENCE: Just say no.

THE PRESIDENT: When it comes time to questioning the terrorists, what's the
Democrats' answer?

AUDIENCE: Just say no.

THE PRESIDENT: So, when the Democrats ask for your vote on November the
7th, what's your answer?

AUDIENCE: No! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: We are on the offense against the enemy wherever we can find
them. One of the important lessons of September the 11th, in this new kind
of war, America must take threats seriously before they come to the
homeland. It's important for the people of this state to understand that
lesson. In other words, when we see a threat we just can no longer hope
that oceans will protect us. We can no longer hope for the best, that in
order to protect you, we must be on the offense. I saw a threat in Saddam
Hussein. Members of both political parties saw a threat in Saddam Hussein.
The United Nations saw a threat in Saddam Hussein. I made the right
decision to take Saddam Hussein from power. (Applause.)

And now, Iraq is the central front in the war on terror. See, this is a
global war. It is being fought on a variety of fronts. And Iraq is now the
central front in this war. Oh, I hear them in Washington all the time
saying Iraq is just a distraction from the war on terror. I don't believe
it's a distraction. Our troops know it is not a distraction in the war on
terror. And guess who else doesn't think it's a distraction? Osama bin
Laden. (Laughter.) He has called Iraq the third world war. He says that
victory for the terrorists in Iraq will mean America's defeat and disgrace
forever.

I want you to listen to the words of a Democrat leader in Washington about
Iraq, just to give you a sense of the difference of opinion, a different
mind set. "The President says that fighting them makes -- fighting them
there makes it less likely we'll have to fight them there [sic]." That's
exactly what I said. I said it then, I'm going to keep saying it because
it's true. "The opposite is true," this lady went on to say. "Because we're
fighting them there, it may be more likely that we will have to fight them
here." I want to remind the Democrats that you do not create terrorism by
fighting terrorists. (Applause.)

Our troops were not in Iraq when the terrorists first hit the Trade Center
in 1993. Our troops were not in Iraq when they attacked in Kenya and
Tanzania and the USS Cole. And our troops were not in Iraq on September the
11th, 2001, when they killed nearly 3,000 people. (Applause.)

The best way to protect you is when we find a terrorist, is to bring them
to justice. And that's exactly what we're going to continue to do.
(Applause.)

We have a plan for victory in Iraq. I'm not going to leave our troops there
unless I can tell you we're going to win. And our plan for victory is an
Iraq that can govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself, and serve
as an ally in the war on terror. And no question about it, the fighting in
Iraq is tough. It's tough because we face a brutal enemy that is willing to
kill innocent men, women and children in order to achieve their objective.
And their objective is to shake the will of the United States. Their
objective is to get enough carnage on the TV screens so that we withdraw
before the job is done.

I've got a message to the terrorists. America does not flee in the face of
thugs and assassins. (Applause.)

Our military is constantly adjusting to tactics necessary to stay ahead of
the enemy. When the enemy makes a decision, we move. And our troops are
performing brilliantly in combat. (Applause.) No matter what your opinion
is about my decision to go into Iraq, America needs to support the men and
women who wear our uniform. (Applause.) And I know the people of Montana
can count on Conrad Burns to make sure our troops have all that is
necessary to do the jobs I've asked them to do. (Applause.)

Our troops are brave, and so are the Iraqis. They've been suffering
unspeakable violence; yet they are dedicated to having a government of and
by and for the people. It's easy to forget, but nearly 12 million people
went to the polls to defy car bombers and assassins and said, we want to
live in a free society. I was pleasantly pleased, but I wasn't surprised,
because I believe freedom is universal. I believe there's an Almighty, and
I believe in the heart of every soul is the desire to be free. (Applause.)

So we'll help this government politically, we'll help them economically,
and we'll help train their security forces so they can take the fight to
the enemy. And we'll succeed. The only way we can fail is if we leave
before the job is done. (Applause.) And that's exactly what the Democrats
want to do.

You know, imagine this: We're in the middle of a war on terror, and one of
the most fundamental fights is in Iraq, and yet the Democrats have no plan
for victory. They have no idea how to win. Harsh criticism is not a plan
for victory. (Laughter.) Leading Democrats argue we ought to pull our
troops off the battlefield right now. Others suggest we ought to withdraw
at a -- on a specific date even though the job may not have been finished.
Others recommend moving our troops to an island some 5,000 miles away.
These are serious leaders making these kinds of suggestions.

Nineteen House Democrats introduced legislation that would cut off funds
for our troops in Iraq. Last week, one of Conrad's colleagues, a Democrat
Senator, explained her party's positions this way: We haven't coalesced
around a single plan, but we're in general agreement on the basic
principles. She's right; they're in agreement that we ought to leave Iraq
before the job is done. I'm not saying these people are unpatriotic; I'm
saying they're wrong. (Applause.) You can't win a war unless you're willing
to fight the war. (Applause.)

Retreat from Iraq before the job is done would embolden the enemy. It would
make this country more vulnerable to attacks. This is a different kind of
war. In this war, if we leave early, if we leave before the job is done,
the enemy will follow us here. If we leave Iraq before the job is done, it
would enable these extremists and radicals to be able to recruit. If we
leave before the job is done, it would embolden the extremists, and it
would dishonor the sacrifice of the men and women who have worn the uniform
of the United States of America. (Applause.)

The consequences of retreat from Iraq would be felt for generations. The
enemy has said that they want to drive us out of Iraq because they want to
establish safe haven, because they believe they can topple moderate
governments. I want you to envision a world in which extremists battle for
power, in which moderate governments have been toppled, in which these
radicals are then capable of using oil to extract blackmail from the West.
Couple all that with a country with a nuclear weapon that can't stand
America, and a generation of Americans will say, what happened in 2006? How
come the leaders couldn't see the impending dangers? Where were they when
the warning signs were evident? I want you to understand, I see the
impending danger. That is why we will support our troops. That is why we
will fight the enemy. And that's why we will win in Iraq. (Applause.)

Victory in Iraq will be a blow to the terrorists and the extremists and the
radicals. Victory will say to those in the Middle East who long for peace,
you've got a friend in America. Victory will make Iraq an ally in the war
on terror. Victory will say to young democracies, we're willing to stand
with you. You see, we not only got great assets in our military, we got a
fantastic asset in the power of liberty.

I want to share a story with you before we -- before I unleash you to go
turn out the vote. (Laughter.) It's a story of my recent trip to Elvis'
place. (Applause.) You might have heard about that. I went down there with
then sitting Prime Minister Koizumi of Japan.

People said, well, why did you go to Elvis' place? Well, one, I had never
been down there. (Applause.) And Laura was kind of -- (laughter) -- pushing
me. She said it's about time we took a family vacation. (Laughter.)
Secondly, Prime Minister Koizumi wanted to go to Elvis' place. He's a big
believer in -- he loved Elvis, in other words.

But I also wanted to tell a story, and it's a story that many of you share
here, too, because you had a relative just like I did that fought the
Japanese. World War II came about, the Japanese attacked us at Pearl
Harbor. In Pearl Harbor, we lost fewer people than we did at the World
Trade Center and in Lancaster, Pennsylvania and the Pentagon. But it was an
attack on the homeland. Thousands of young Americans volunteered -- just
like happening today, by the way.

One of those volunteers was George H. W. Bush, Navy fighter pilot.
(Applause.) And he, like a lot of other youngsters, fought hard against the
Japanese. Thousands and thousands died. It was a bloody war. I find it very
interesting that on the plane down to Elvis' place, I was talking about
keeping the peace with the Prime Minister of the former enemy. Something
happened between my dad's being in the Navy and your relatives being in the
military fighting the Japanese, and in 2006, the President of the United
States talking about the peace.

See, we're talking about the fact that Japan had a thousand troops in Iraq.
Prime Minister Koizumi understands what I know: In this ideological
struggle of moderation versus extremism, when you find a young democracy,
you support that democracy. We talked about working to end the scourge of
HIV/AIDS on the continent of Africa, understanding to whom much is given,
much is required. We were talking about the North Korean and how we must
work together to convince him to give up his nuclear weapons.

Something happened between World War II and talking about the peace: Japan
adopted a Japanese-style democracy. The lesson of history is, liberty has
got the capacity to convert an enemy into an ally. (Applause.) Liberty has
got the capacity to turn regions of despair into regions of hope. Freedom
is universal. People desire to be free, and the more people that become
free, the more likely it is our children will live in peace.

Some day duly elected leaders from the Middle East will be talking about
keeping the peace with an American President, and generations of Americans
will be better off for it. (Applause.)

And that's why I say these are historic times. In the election -- the
differences of opinion in this election are clear. If you want your taxes
to go up, just go ahead and vote Democrat. If you want your taxes to stay
low so this economy continue to grow and create opportunity, elect Conrad
Burns to the United States Senate. (Applause.) If you want this country to
do everything in its power to protect the American people, to stay on the
offense against an enemy, and at the same time create the conditions for
lasting peace, you vote for Conrad Burns for the United States Senate.
(Applause.) And while you're in there, make sure Denny goes back to
Washington, too. (Applause.)

So my call for our fellow citizens is to leave the hall, find our fellow
Republicans and tell them we have a duty to vote, find discerning Democrats
and remind them about the stakes, find discerning independents and tell
them what's at stake in this election. Work hard between now and election
day, turn out the vote, and Conrad Burns will be reelected for the United
States Senate.

God Bless.

END 12:12 P.M. MST
===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/11/20061102-3.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)